It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
The trouble with this subject is money. Many so called UFO 'researchers' are just in it to make cash by selling books and doing lectures. No one wants to buy a book called 'UFO's dont exist' so most of the published or popular material on this subject is completely one sided.
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
Well as far as Ufologist go. Probally one of the most famous names out there is, Stanton Friedman. He has a degree in physics and also has a opinion on almost everything ufo like.
Originally posted by InsideYourMind
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China - 2010
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
I'd say these were the most credible events simply because of the amount of eye-witnesses and confusion as to what the object's actually were, aswell as the media-attention both of these events recieved.
Stanton Friedman, according to his own biography is not a Dr. and dropped out of nuclear physics to make more money on the UFO circuit a few years after he left college.
Originally posted by zorgon
His main claim to fame is he debunks Bob Lazar on a regular basis (has a new version on his site) and says that "some UFO's are alien spacecraft, yet has no more hard evidence than anyone else in the field.. but sells more books, dvd's and lectures than the others because he once was a nuclear physicist.
Originally posted by lacrimosa
www.abovetopsecret.com...
here's a good thread listing alot of the better case's of ufo's (well the first few pages).
edit on 21-12-2011 by lacrimosa because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Blue Shift
But he has never come forward with the actual proof to back it up.
Originally posted by zorgon
Stanton Friedman, according to his own biography is not a Dr. and dropped out of nuclear physics to make more money on the UFO circuit a few years after he left college. Ya have to wonder how a career in UFOlogy is more profitable than one in Nuclear Physics.
His main claim to fame is he debunks Bob Lazar on a regular basis (has a new version on his site) and says that "some UFO's are alien spacecraft, yet has no more hard evidence than anyone else in the field.. but sells more books, dvd's and lectures than the others because he once was a nuclear physicist.
Originally posted by zorgon
Looking at posts at ATS you can see people are here mostly for the entertainment.
Originally posted by zorgon Because no one, not ONE since Roswell has one piece of hard evidence... all just stories