Ron Paul is a racist.

reply to post by TinfoilTP


I am not a racist, But whatever you see affirmative action as a hand up and the bussing of those kids as a hand up, to me it's pure and simple a hand out, and one that could be better used on someone who actually has pride in their education and work.

I hate apologists, I hate PC, and I love Ron Paul, the world is (Should be) based on those that are smart and innovative being successful, not having success given to them on a silver platter. BTW last time I looked a LOT A LOT of Ethnic groups not given the same "HAND OUTS" rose to success through their hard work, that is what it should be about, and it's not, that much is obvious just look at the president, if he had been white, well he would not be where he is today!!!! Affirmative action at work folks!

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by Southern Guardian

 

You didnt answer a single question or address the fact

Let's bring up your questions:

your so sure that the fed gov wouldnt do the same thing, that youd run the risk that they could mandate that ALL states practice segregation if they chose to do so?

No, never stated that I hold more confidence in the Federal government than I do the State. This still doesn't change the fact that it took the actions of the Federal government, not the States, to make the necessary changes to ensure individual rights over our course of history. In addition to this, where the Federal government fails, we have SCOTUS to take the necessary steps. I don't support maximizing the powers of either the State, Federal governments or SCOTUS, I'm concerned about protecting individual rights.

You want power to the people, but you think that the people have a better chance fighting the FEDERAL government , then they do STATE mandates?

I support protecting the fundamental rights of the individual, not the majority. The other member made a very good point earlier in this thread, that behind the actions and invasive laws of the State governments over the years lied the support of the majority of residents in those States. We've seen how the decisions of majority mob rule in this country have only served to infringe on the fundamental liberties of the minority. This is about the fundamental rights of the individual, something this country was at core founded upon. Neither the majority nor the States should be given unprecedented powers to infringe upon individual liberties, Getready disagrees with this, Ron Paul does as well, so do you apparently.

The civil war wasnt about slavery,

Whether you believe the civil war wasn't about slavery we can leave for another thread to debate on, this was not what I stated in my previous posts. Had you actually paid attention, you would have noticed that I stated that it took the actions of the federal government to end the institution of slavery nationwide, and this was regardless of whether you believe Lincoln came into the war because of slavery or not. In the end it was his action and the action of the Federal government that ended the institution, regardless of the agenda behind their actions.

reply to post by Southern Guardian


mob rule will never work, especially now. States rights should be encouraged, but there should be a law enacted that the people of that state have the ability to vote on the laws passed by their state government, and by the way it is much easier to vote out state officials than federal officials. So you decide, would you rather have a mega-corrupt federal government, or a semi-corrupt state government? A state government, that you can vote out easier and perhaps a federal law can be passed that gives more power to the people, dealing with their ability to vote on their state and county laws. Perhaps we should break laws down by county, people of the counties can vote in laws for their own county which best suit their county. The only thing that should remain state run should be education. The smaller the government the better, for the most part. The only thing the federal government should be doing is protecting our currency and empowering the business environment to be able to succeed better. And national defense.

Originally posted by getreadyalready
I don't wish to make it about anything.

Well that's wonderful then, you can stop complaining about States rights being included in this debate then

The fact is, this is about the election for President, not a state election. It is what it is. Everything else is irrelavent.

I disagree. I think the topic of individual rights and liberties are important to the debate of whether a candidate for the presidency is suitable, or whether he has good intentions. Unfortunately for you, States rights is an important factor within the debate of individual liberties and policies to ensure the rights in this country. Ron Paul's core campaign is also about restoring unprecedented powers back to the States, once again making the topic of States rights relevant to this thread.

Continue on.

Originally posted by smarterthanyou
reply to post by Southern Guardian

 

mob rule will never work, especially now. States rights should be encouraged, but there should be a law enacted that the people of that state have the ability to vote on the laws passed by their state government, and by the way it is much easier to vote out state officials than federal officials. So you decide, would you rather have a mega-corrupt federal government, or a semi-corrupt state government? A state government, that you can vote out easier and perhaps a federal law can be passed that gives more power to the people, dealing with their ability to vote on their state and county laws. Perhaps we should break laws down by county, people of the counties can vote in laws for their own county which best suit their county. The only thing that should remain state run should be education. The smaller the government the better, for the most part. The only thing the federal government should be doing is protecting our currency and empowering the business environment to be able to succeed better. And national defense.

Your ideas seem to be the best presented anywhere!

That way if you don't like something in one area you can move to an area that is more like what you want. Especially if you're outvoted by white apologists and the PC brigade!!!

Originally posted by smarterthanyou
reply to post by Southern Guardian

 

mob rule will never work, especially now. States rights should be encouraged,

I find it interesting that you have this belief that mob rule and States rights are mutually excluse, they are not. History will give you a good demonstration of this, think back to the jim crow years and the support of the majorities in those States at the time.

So you decide, would you rather have a mega-corrupt federal government, or a semi-corrupt state government?

I wouldn't have either, I'd don't see those as the only choices at all.

reply to post by Tea4One


Whether RP is a racist or not I dont know (honestly cannot tell)...but I do know if any other GOP candidate was accussed of this with the evidence you provided A: your would have 100+ stars and flags immediatly and B: Probably made a super mod...

hahahaha

Obama's FAR more racist than Ron Paul...

reply to post by Tea4One



do try and stop being so hysterical dearie, with your "demonising" racist terminology you dilute it, it becomes meaningless, better try next time eh

reply to post by Tea4One

Ron Paul appeared as a guest on CNN’s American Morning Tuesday, and put on a lively, sometimes-contentious interview with Ali Velshi. The visit began in a state of calm, with talk about Paul’s surge in Iowa, as Velshi quoted a Nate Silver study that gives Paul a 52% chance of winning the caucus

“We certainly do have a chance,” Paul said. “I think we’re in a good position. I’m really enjoying it.”

Velshi quickly got into more serious topics, like Paul’s advocating for the elimination of federal departments and, more specifically, his belief that the Federal Reserve should be scuttled. Velshi asked Paul if the Fed — and central banking as a whole — is a major problem:

Velshi then brought up quotes attributed to a Paul newsletter from 20 years ago that included racist and prejudiced ideals. Paul has disavowed them several times and contends that a person on his staff of six to eight people wrote it. He added that he was practicing medicine at the time and didn’t have much oversight with the newsletter.

When Velshi pressed Paul on the topic, the GOP candidate challenged people to read everything he’s said or written, at which point they’d realize the comments were a glaring anomaly. “These charges are a total contradiction to everything I’ve said and everything I believe.”

Ron Paul & Ali Velshi on CNN

ETA:
I know this is CNN, but these are the words of Dr. Ron Paul, straight from his own mouth and I for one believe in him thus far.

reply to post by Tea4One


How does that make him a racist?
So he doesn't think the government should be allowed to tell business owners they can't have any control over who comes into their stores. So what.

You misinterpreted something that makes total sense as racism. That is what this over P.C. culture has done to your braiiin. Ruined a perfectly good one.

He isn't against the civil rights act because of anything to do with race. He is against it because it says a store owner has no control over their own store. People should be able to stop anyone the want from coming in. It's their store. It is obsolete in this day and age. If a school segregates or a business doesn't allow races in then it will do nothing but kill their business and run themselves out. It would allow store owners to keep out some legit threats to their stores too though which is why it would be good. It also makes it completely equal so black store owners could do the same thing.. so how does that make him racist if what he proposes would make it equal for everyone?

Feel ashamed that you tried to tarnish a man's name because you were ignorant of the situation?

Well, President Obama has not helped African Americans at all, in fact he dances quite well to the tunes of the same white boys who controlled Bush. What does that say about him?

reply to post by Tea4One


Also.. it looks like that picture is at an event. He has his picture taken with anyone that walks up to him

Here is a picture of serial killer John Wayne Gacy with former first lady Rosalynn Carter.



Bill and Hillary with criminal business man Tony Rezko (who also has ties to Obama and Rod Blagovich)

Here's some video of "racist" Ron Paul www.youtube.com...

Yeah, he sounds real racist to me

The harsh truth.

reply to post by Cynicaleye


Observe the video in the post above yours. Rethink everything.

Reply to post by MiloNickels

Ha ha haaaaaaa!!!!

Only in America can a mixed-race man be more racist than whites.

We live in the twilight zone, my friends.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

If Ron Paul wanted to be a racist pro KKK guy like David Duke I've no doubt he would have done so. If the op is suggesting that he buried the act to somehow pull the wool over our eyes that is a bit much. The guy has been the underdog for the longest time. He has walked the path and taken all of the blows. There is no racism coming from his mouth. If you look on you tube you can find dozens of videos on this topic, and you can't reply to any of them.

reply to post by Tea4One


GET A CLUE

There are already a long list of non-white RACE BASED charter schools and universities.To boot, the admission policies for regular universities is set to discriminate against whites. I have twice now, ON MY GAS BILL, I mean the same page as my billing, had a solicitation to donate money specifically to send BLACK STUDENTS to traditionally BLACK colleges. Why is that OKAY? This is in a state & city that host the INDIANA BLACK EXPO that is within a country that does not have a single holiday honoring a single white American. In fact, the holiday we do have is for a man that was a known communist, plagiarist, served no public office, had a stolen name from an Anglo Saxon Protestant religious leader, and I won't complete the huge list of things demonstrating that manufactured/staged fraud. (The propaganda that the government was out to stop King is false, they protected the info on him and even sealed his file until 2027)

Are you so blinded with your own bigotry that you cannot see the hypocrisy? What causes such willful ignorance?

DEMOCIDE:
The objectives of such a plan of democide include the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.-

COMPENSATORY PSYCHOLOGICAL GENOCIDE & GLOBAL TYRANNY-
United Nations General Assembly
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide 1948:


(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

Any person of integrity and character should feel compelled in light of the above to help promote education and association of peoples with their own kith and kin instead of promoting the subjugation, indoctrination, division, and dissolution of such peoples.


Muhammad Ali saw through the scam!



“Not society, GOD made us different” “it ain't sad because I want my child to look like me, every intelligent person wants his child to look like him” “I’m sad because I don’t want to blot out my race and lose my beautiful identity?” “Who wants to spot up yourself and kill your race?” "You hate on your people if you don’t want to stay who you are; you ashamed what god made you?” --Muhammad Ali, on racial integration

“It’s a great brainwashing process, which goes very slow[ly] and is divided [into] four basic stages. The first one [is] demoralization; it takes from 15-20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which [is required] to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxist-Leninist ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students, without being challenged, or counter-balanced by the basic values of Americanism (American patriotism).” ~ Yuri Beznemov, former KGB agent

I wouldn't worry about Ron Paul because even if 100% of the population voted for him he would either not be allowed to obtain office, he would be drugged/poisoned, or they would assassinate him like they did the uncooperative Kennedy's. Maybe I can just send you one of those black Santa Claus's I keep seeing to ease your worry!

Originally posted by Tea4One
Public School Civil Rights Act 1984

This bill would allow schools to re-segregate.

The Dallas public schools have been re-segregated for many years. By re-segregated I mean all white white kids are gone.