posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 02:11 PM
I couldn't agree more and I have never grasped the logic behind arguing against a photo ID. This is assuming we actually have a % large enough to
talk about in America who would WANT to vote, are REGISTERED already yet have never cashed a check, held a job, driven a car, flown in a plane since
9/11 or opened an account of any kind, anywhere from a rental movies to stock funds, in their life.
Considering any of those things require a photo ID, we must assume this mythical minority who would be disenfranchised by the requirement have simply
not done a thing from that list. Hard to believe eh?
Of course your OP and the story says ALL voting laws...so if they fail to check-mate photo ID to stop the most obvious cases of fraud of multiple
voting, they can surely find another area of law to tweak and achieve a similar end result.
Why did we have to get one of the most political weasels to ever sit at Justice, just in time to screw up everything a good political animal just
can't help themselves but to hopelessly screw up? Some days the stories just leave 'doomed' as a word which comes woefully short of describing our
current daily reality.