It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by isyeye
www.dailymail.co.uk...
'The main plan is to carefully survey and document the shafts, to gather as much information as possible to allow archaeologists to determine their purpose. We also still plan to look beyond the blocking stones at the ends of the shafts, if it is safe and practical to do so.'
The four narrow shafts deep inside the 4,500-year-old Great Pyramid have puzzled archaeologists ever since they were first found in 1872.
The shafts are just eight inches across - and thus can't be explored by human explorers. Many experts believe that the shaft was designed to provide an 'exit' for the Pharaoh's spirit into.
That's theologically inept. So you think the universe just made itself? You think man just keeps on creating and creating? How? From whence does this prima materia derive?
Originally posted by Arken
Last secret door of Great Pyramid 'to be opened in 2012', says British company
www.dailymai l.co.uk
The secret gates at the heart of the Great Pyramid may be opened for the first time in 2012, a British robot company believes - solving a mystery that has puzzled archaeologists since 1872.
Scoutek UK had already begun exploring behind the gates earlier this year - and produced the first-ever images from behind the gates using a 'micro snake' robot. But the exploration was halted by the recent unrest in Egypt.
Expedition leader Shaun Whitehead said, 'I'm very confident we can resume work in 2012.'
I "SO" hope that this information is accurate, but am a tad bit skeptical that this door has not ALREADY been opened, by Zahi Hawass to ensure that there will be no archaeological SURPRISES that he does not want seen.
Hawass has been hiding and supressing a number of archaeological finds, including 35 foot sarcophagi brought out last year, or was it the beginning of this year sometime???
Hawass has systematically hidden and/or destroyed ANYTHING he does not agree with - and that INCLUDES the items uncovered that might even hint at or show that Egyptians had extraterrestrial help in building the pyramids over 10,000 years ago.
Hawass is just a hindrance at this point, as far as I'm concerned, and needs to be REMOVED from his position of authority.
Let someone in there who will show us the REAL treasures and giant remains that have been uncovered!
edit on 16-12-2011 by Arken because: (no reason given)edit on 16-12-2011 by Gemwolf because: Corrected title to reflect source title
So whats the big deal if they have already entered the pyramid?? Is there a part they havent been to yet?
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by jibeho
The door was already breached, behind it is just a small empty chamber before one of the rocks to the outer wall, basically. Here is proof:
My guess is that door was just a blocker so no unwanted sand or dust went into the planned venting tunnel while building, looks like they changed their mind about the tunnel though, and sealed it at the last second.
One thing is interesting though: the handles to that door are made of metal. What metal does not erode in 4000 years? Also, no other metal was ever used in the construction of the pyramid...
sounds like back peddling about Lilith,
If it isnt then that means God doesnt know the future and cancels itself as being supreme and all knowing. Flawed logic will always equalize no matter how you spin it.
it does not follow that the same substantive and accurate answers to those questions can be found in a religious / deity based belief system.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by spikey
it does not follow that the same substantive and accurate answers to those questions can be found in a religious / deity based belief system.
There's no flaw in my reasoning.
If man created man, or man is responsible for the continued evolution of man, than who created man? What is this primal substance that man works with, or what man originally came from? It is a theologically inept premise, because it doesn't account for a logical beginning.