What's going on in Copernicus crater?

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by arianna

 

So, allow us to be clear here (if I may?)...

the impression the surface is like 'coral' but the close views show that the texture is something completely different. The clues are to found in the rotated view where I have aligned the vertical objects....

This is ALL due respect.

It is certainly worth the effort (at this point) that YOU (as the ATS "OP") make the effort, as mentioned...to please, please...AFTER all of these claims, to "PLEASE". please proved some outside corroboration......just a bit, any bit please??

Would be very much appreciated......THANKS much, "in advance".....only the "proof"..... "PLEASE"...using whichever accent you might find the most humourous ...(OR, "humorous"....take your pick), there...."OK?"...

Thanks...

(BB code)

edit on Tue 3 January 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)

With respect, what kind of corroboration are you looking for?

I believe I may be the sole researcher when it comes to exploring the martian surface looking for surface features that may relate to the possibility of life existing on the planet.

NASA does not seem to be doing any research on the subject. All they appear to be interested in are the conditions and suitability for sending a manned mission to the planet. If they do know of the tiny beings and the vast number of tiny structures they are keeping very quiet about it.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by arianna
You may notice that although the surface of the rock is curved the vertical objects still remain upright which indicates that the objects on the surface are not natural formations.

Why do you say that?

I will post an image shortly that may help.

reply to post by arianna

I believe I may be the sole researcher when it comes to exploring the martian surface looking for surface features that may relate to the possibility of life existing on the planet.

You are one of countless Martian anomaly searchers. You are the only one that thinks they're teeny tiny little people with human faces carving teeny tiny little face shaped cities on crater walls. Check out this thread, for example:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Most of your colleagues are under the impression that Martians are huge, and construct huge human-shaped structures.

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by arianna

 

I believe I may be the sole researcher when it comes to exploring the martian surface looking for surface features that may relate to the possibility of life existing on the planet.

You are one of countless Martian anomaly searchers. You are the only one that thinks they're teeny tiny little people with human faces carving teeny tiny little face shaped cities on crater walls. Check out this thread, for example:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Most of your colleagues are under the impression that Martians are huge, and construct huge human-shaped structures.

I cannot agree that Martians were huge but it is possible they constructed large structures. I believe in ancient times the 'people' of the martian civilizations were of mature size and would stand between four feet six inches and five feet tall. There are archaeological remnants scattered on the terrain at various locations which give the impression of a past intelligent existence. I am of the opinion that in ancient times the mature species was very advanced but had to leave the planet due to an impending catastrophe such as an unstoppable asteroid strike which they knew would completely wipe out civilization as they knew it. There is some evidence that a 'great flood' may have occured at some point in the martian past and it is possible that a huge tsunami may have developed which swamped and pushed over everything in its path including people, structures and statues. It would have virtually destroyed everything.

The Old Testament in the christian bible mentions a 'great flood'. Could it possibly be that the flood being referred to happened on Mars, and not on Earth. The reference to Noah's Ark could have been a large space machine or possibly, many space machines. In the bible the text tells us that many different species were loaded onto the ark 'two-by-two'. Could this have been done so that where ever the martians travelled to the various species could continue to evolve. Maybe some parts of the Old Testament are referring to ancient events that could only have been of an extraterrestrial nature.

Originally posted by arianna
I believe I may be the sole researcher when it comes to exploring the martian surface looking for surface features that may relate to the possibility of life existing on the planet.

Clearly, you're not the only one. You're not even the only ATS member talking about an ancient, miniature, civilisation.

All they appear to be interested in are the conditions and suitability for sending a manned mission to the planet.

Not really. The Rovers' mission was to study the geology, to try to understand if the geological processes on Mars were similar to those on the Earth, then they moved to the "follow the water" phase, in which they have been using mostly Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to look for signs of ancient water and to understand what happened to the water. Now they are going to look more in depth at some areas, along with a wider research spectrum, including, once more, looking for signs of life.

Here is a 3D view of the rock slab as seen above.

If you don't believe there could be tiny-sized civilizations on Mars, you need to see this.

Red/cyan glasses required. Let your eyes adjust to the scene.




Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...

reply to post by arianna


I'm sorry but.....have you been influenced by others' works, such as this??:



(At least the musical accompaniment is pleasant to listen to...)

I certainly hope that *you* are not "having a laugh" at other ATS members with these posts....

OR....were you perhaps influenced by this horrible video?? (Again, the music isn't all that bad, at least):



Or even worse, as music choices deteriorate...this next sounds like a 1970s porn: ( )




BUT....the funniest and "MOST Delusional of all Award" goes to this guy!!!:




Please admit to either on or two things....one being I had fun with you, ATS!!! LOL!!!............

reply to post by ProudBird


The last two videos look like they have the same ID, and none of them works.

Originally posted by arianna

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by arianna

 

I cannot agree that Martians were huge but it is possible they constructed large structures. I believe in ancient times the 'people' of the martian civilizations were of mature size and would stand between four feet six inches and five feet tall. There are archaeological remnants scattered on the terrain at various locations which give the impression of a past intelligent existence. I am of the opinion that in ancient times the mature species was very advanced but had to leave the planet due to an impending catastrophe such as an unstoppable asteroid strike which they knew would completely wipe out civilization as they knew it. There is some evidence that a 'great flood' may have occured at some point in the martian past and it is possible that a huge tsunami may have developed which swamped and pushed over everything in its path including people, structures and statues. It would have virtually destroyed everything.

The Old Testament in the christian bible mentions a 'great flood'. Could it possibly be that the flood being referred to happened on Mars, and not on Earth. The reference to Noah's Ark could have been a large space machine or possibly, many space machines. In the bible the text tells us that many different species were loaded onto the ark 'two-by-two'. Could this have been done so that where ever the martians travelled to the various species could continue to evolve. Maybe some parts of the Old Testament are referring to ancient events that could only have been of an extraterrestrial nature.

edit on 3-1-2012 by arianna because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-1-2012 by arianna because: text change

This kind of thinking doesn't isolate you for it seems that the majority of ATS members are "tetched" and fling out comments that are the result of mental disorders. At least you are in the company of even bigger nut jobs such as John Lear, Richard Hoagland, some astronauts. Go to Hollywood, there's a shortness there of fantasy writers with real far out theories that could look good on the big screen.

Originally posted by arianna
Here is a 3D view of the rock slab as seen above.

If you don't believe there could be tiny-sized civilizations on Mars, you need to see this.

Red/cyan glasses required. Let your eyes adjust to the scene.
[snip]
Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...

edit on 3-1-2012 by arianna because: (no reason given)

You could stand on your head 'til the cows come home and the image will never be in 3-D, or at photobucket. Your drive should be studied.

Originally posted by arianna
Maybe some parts of the Old Testament are referring to ancient events that could only have been of an extraterrestrial nature.

but how does that relate to the 'great flood'?

Here is a very close view of the structural objects on the rock slab.

The structures are very small and many different shapes can be observed.



Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...

reply to post by arianna


en.wikipedia.org...

I'm sorry but I will not reply to naysayers who come to this thread and do not contribute anything positive. The amount of research I have conducted of into features and anomalies on the Moon and Mars is huge and has devoured many hours. If anyone has doubts about what is being posted here I suggest they conduct their own research to verify what is being presented.

There is no geological formations in the last image, but a huge tiny-sized city that spreads all over the slab of rock. In this image I have placed an ellipse around some of the objects and it is plain to see that some of the highlighted objects are definitely not any form geology.



Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...

Originally posted by arianna
There is no geological formations in the last image, but a huge tiny-sized city that spreads all over the slab of rock.

There is no geological formations in the last image, but a huge tiny-sized city that spreads all over the slab of rock. In this image I have placed an ellipse around some of the objects and it is plain to see that some of the highlighted objects are definitely not any form geology.

Direct view. i985.photobucket.com...

Absolutely ridiculous.

'There is no way a that miniature civilization of moon-people could have built a tiny city of such hugeness. They MUST have had help from a technologically superior extralunar race, who are most likely the ones depicted in all of the monolithic lunar face sculptures, obviously intended to be viewed by said beings from a vantage point far above the lunar surface.

reply to post by arianna

There is no geological formations in the last image, but a huge tiny-sized city that spreads all over the slab of rock. In this image I have placed an ellipse around some of the objects and it is plain to see that some of the highlighted objects are definitely not any form geology.

Um.....okay....

Wow.

Almost speechless here.

You say you are a "researcher".
=====================

Does that term (researcher) mean you do this in a scientific way with ties to peer review, or that you look at photos on your own and keep looking until you've convinced yourself something is there?

Is there anything besides your opinion that can verify "There is no geological formations in the last image, but a huge tiny-sized city that spreads all over the slab of rock. In this image"?
===========================

If you have some sort of evidence of this besides your "vision" of what is there, I'm sure Everyone would love to see it.

In fact you have been asked many times in this thread to provide something to back up your opinions that you put forth as fact.
=============================

You have answered those requests with more photos asking members to find "art" in them.

Could you please answer this with evidence or other documentation besides more pictures of rocks and reprimands of doubters?

I don't get what I am meant to be looking at?

There is no geological formations in the last image, but a huge tiny-sized city that spreads all over the slab of rock. In this image I have placed an ellipse around some of the objects and it is plain to see that some of the highlighted objects are definitely not any form geology.

I spent some time looking very hard at these images and I do see what you are describing and I have to say that I have no way to explain them otherwise. It is really hard to believe but you have to go with what the evidence says and there very well may be that there is a very large yet tiny city there. Complete domination of this civilization should be a piece of cake.

Originally posted by jNormal
I don't get what I am meant to be looking at?

Apparently a

huge tiny-sized city

LOL If you can see that then hell, I check myself into the loony bin.