It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pervius
Stephen Hawking said "God does not exist"
Meaning there is no entity in the Universe effecting mankind on Earth.
Well couldn't the "Alienz" be doing it and be the "Gods"?????
Maybe they just created us to mine the Gold for them. Every 10,000 years or so they decimate us and take all the Gold...leave a few people alive to restart the process of mining the Gold.
There's a massive amount of Gold from human history missing. Nobody knows where it is.
Originally posted by lizardman
Dilly must be an unimaginative depressed realist who thinks that when he dies its just going to be a black void of nothingness and that his life of trolling will just end in a blink of an eye. Good for you dilly. The rest of us have whats called an open mind. We are not blinded by what you call lifes truths but rather open to the impossible. Go and spend your miserable life beratng any potential human or et possibilities while you type on your blackberry that you have no idea how it was made or could possibly think of.
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
Einstein.
edit on 14-12-2011 by lizardman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AceWombat04
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I don't believe this can possibly be true. Reason being, imagine a species that arose beyond simple animal..enough to make giant weapons of mass destruction (a necessary first step towards interstellar ability) that didn't have a healthy dose of tolerance, compassion, etc.
Simply put, such a species (if it was able to actually even evolve beyond hunter) would end up destroying itself long before it even reached the nearest moon.
No compassion, no tolerance...it would be perpetual warfare beyond anything we could understand..on their planet. so, it is illogical to think this would be a likelyhood.
Whereas, a species that had hyper-inflated beleviolent tendencys would fast track to the stars due to exceptional cooperation on a global (and eventually galactic) scale...and would eventually be the "gatekeepers" of the universe.
Simple rule. 3 working together makes a monument, 3 working against each other makes craters
I can see where one might come to that conclusion, and I say this with the utmost respect, but in my opinion it is a logical fallacy to do so. The problem is that all of that is supposition. We don't know what elements or what sort of an environment might make up the worlds where other intelligent life might evolve. They might be nothing at all like life Earth. Life itself might be nothing at all like what we can imagine or what we've seen on Earth.
We don't know what evolutionary path they might follow. We don't know if all the things we assume are innate to the evolution of intelligent life (your examples, like WMDs for example... for all we know that isn't a required step for creating advanced interstellar-capable propulsion systems) really are innate anywhere else beyond our own world. Just because here we had to develop WMDs before spacefaring propulsion systems doesn't guarantee that has any bearing whatsoever on another world's technological development. All sorts of factors could impact that; factors we can't possibly predict. Their biology, how they perceive, how they communicate, how they think (do they think linearly, laterally, linguistically, or in some manner we can't even conceive of?) and other things could totally destroy any feasible analog to our own advancement that we can think of.
One of literally unlimited scenarios might be a super-cooperative, hive-like species that cooperates amongst itself, but eradicates anything else it comes across for its own benefit. Another might be a species that has developed a new form of mathematics (or its own analogue thereof) that it believes allows it to predict the future so accurately, that it decides to destroy us before we become what it believes will eventually pose a threat. Those are just two off the top of my head, constituted by things I can imagine.
We're anthropomorphising something we might not even be capable of imagining for all we know. None of the scenarios I mentioned are necessarily more probable than the benevolent, peaceful spacefaring civilization, but that doesn't render what Hawking said any less prudent in my opinion. I'm a big proponent and supporter of SETI, so don't get me wrong. But the consequences really are unpredictable at this stage. I don't think we can rationally refute that.
Just my two cents. Peace.
Originally posted by ConspiracyTruth
reply to post by dilly1
Wow, you say those things in the very month that we hear Jupiter's moon may have contained life, that there are mineral deposits on Mars, and that we may have discovered a particle faster than light! What are you talking about? Humans as a species flew into the space just shortly after first flying into the sky.
It's natural for any individual human to explore the unknown, the great mysteries in life... it is no more futile an act that going into work from 9 to 5 every day. It's just part of the human experience.
What progress have you made by posting here?
Originally posted by ConspiracyTruth
reply to post by dilly1
You're nothing but a troll who gets off on pooping on people's imaginary parades. Your posts contribute diddily squat. If you were truly more enlightened than the rest of us, you wouldn't be posting here in the first place. Your posts are far more futile than ours. The majority of us live contented lives and enjoy exploring curious topics, imagination is a natural brain enhancer/therapy, and it's what gets humans from point A to B, whether it's inventing a plane or figuring out an analytics mystery at work (something I do every day, very fun) or just having fun talking about the great mysteries in life. You instead live in your 'perceived' reality and call out anyone who thinks up alternatives to it... it's ridiculous and silly.edit on 14-12-2011 by ConspiracyTruth because: (no reason given)edit on 14-12-2011 by ConspiracyTruth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ConspiracyTruth
reply to post by dilly1
Give. Me. A. Break.
You don't think I realize NASA is a PR front? You criticize those who research UFOs, and gather info from as many sources as possible, and have concluded that aliens may be visiting, and NASA could be covering up this fact... and then you criticize those who give you the impression they don't believe in conspiracies/cover ups and follow some official story line from NASA.
We all agree on this site that there is massive disinfo and truth shielding going on by the various institutions that runt his world. You're not "unique" in that opinion. There is nothing wrong with using your imagination, personal experiences, and digestion of all the media, to come to their own conclusions about the Great Mysteries in Life. YOU don't know if ET exists or has visited, and neither do I. You're not living in a greater reality than anyone else on this board.
It's your personal belief that the alien myth is planted to distract us from other truths? Is that what I'm getting at? And it's your job to get people off that track and then lead them.... where? You've hit a dead end. Your personal belief is based on as much of your own "imagination" as any of ours. Get over yourself! You just like feeling smarter than other people, that's all there is to your posts, and everyone can see through it. Your posts are just as self-serving as ours, except at least ours aren't so antagonistic.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
Imagine you are part of the last survivors of your planets final hours,you are part of a fleet searching for a new planet,low on fuel,you find Earth.
You can't leave without refueling,and the Earthlings start shooting bombs at you,so you have no choice but to fight.
Of course,having the tech required to get to Earth means that your race has vastly more powerful weapons,so Earth is taken over in a matter of days.
Instant new home.
Originally posted by ConspiracyTruth
reply to post by dilly1
What? First off, you can believe NASA is a PR front, and that it still puts out good info. I mean it's not like they hide EVERYTHING - they couldn't, haha! The stuff about Mars and Jupiter's moon came out way before NASA came out with it. I totally agree we don't know what's up or what's down due to all the disinfo and whatnot. The point I was trying to make is there is plenty of evidence ET life exists or has existed (again that stuff NASA recently announced, and the CERN stuff were rumored about and discussed at length well before there were official stories around them).
There is PLENTY of reason to believe the universe features ET life, and evidence to believe it may have interacted with our planet in the past and/or present. It's not simply about UFOs - I've studied the topic at great length, and that's just one piece of the puzzle. Again, I'm still on the fence on the topic! You're the one that is so arrogant as to assume your belief about aliens is more correct than anyone else's.
I'm not desperately awaiting some alien arrival, haha. Just like I'm not desperately awaiting some Utopian society - but I do like imagining the possibilities and teasing them out. There's nothing wrong or detrimental about that. All you're doing is comparing your imagined perceptions of the real world with other people's, and saying yours are based more on reality. That's just not true. But you can believe that if you'd like!