It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
As i said earlier. We asked pakistan time and time and time again to help us. We cant simply go home... if we do? Guess what. They come back , they rebuild , re organize. I guess you have no idea of warfare.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by iamconcerned
Considering we could take on the Chinese , we could simply land lock them and bomb their natural resources (Oil) to hell and back.
Considering American Strategic Oil Reserve is estimated to have more than what the middle east has now.
Originally posted by sonicbaz
There are people in this world right now plotting to acquire a nuclear device.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by intrptr
Yes it is Military Industrial though.
You should learn it. You dont win defensive wars.
I assume you're not challenging the fact that there exists in Pakistan a fundamental Islamic problem.
Originally posted by milkyway12
Any engagement directed against US military personnel or equipment by Pakistan should be treated with retalitory strikes.
Originally posted by DigitalSea
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by DigitalSea
What the US is doing is deliberately starting a heated discussion with Pakistan without any solid evidence whatsoever that Pakistan is a place that provides a safe harbour for terrorists.
Never heard of the Swat Valley, I take it.
the "heated discussion" this round seems to have been started with folks flinging bullets at US soldiers across a border.
Apparently they didn't like the answer they got to that. Bummer.
So what you're saying is because someone was shooting at US soldiers from across the Pakistan border that there must be terrorists and Pakistan must be behind them? It's like I shooting across from Australia to another equally bordering country like New Zealand and then New Zealand coming out and saying, "Australia is firing upon us, there must be terrorists there and Australia must be providing a safe harbour for them"
I've seen nothing but blatant lies and misinformation in this thread.
The bottom line is the US doesn't like the thought of another country potentially building weapons and means to protect itself from countries like the US. It's perfectly okay for the US to build secretive nuclear programs, weapons and develop technologies that would give them an unfair advantage in any war, whilst single-handedly telling other countries they can't do the same thing.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by Swills
Maybe the US is tired of Pakistan harboring terrorist?
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by Swills
Maybe the US is tired of Pakistan harboring terrorist?
One persons terrorist is another persons freedom fighter. Their country is being illegally invaded their innocent civilians are being killed they have every right to fight back. If we really wanted to end this "war on terror" then we need to go after the countries that started and helped set up these terrorist/ freedom fighters. But then we couldn't do that can we? Because Israel created Hamas and the US created the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
Originally posted by Babbleman
I assume you're not challenging the fact that there exists in Pakistan a fundamental Islamic problem.
I am. Believe it or not Islam adapts well to peace.
It adapts well to war too, hence the reason few will achieve any type of victory in the Middle East.
It's a wasted cause for the west. They would be better addressing their own problems.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
You have presented 0 facts.
Originally posted by InsideYourMind
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by Swills
Maybe the US is tired of Pakistan harboring terrorist?
Forgot to place the word "Fictional" in that sentence?
You see, the thing is, there really are no terrorists in Pakistan.
NEW DELHI: India told Pakistan Saturday it was awaiting “decisive” action against the perpetrators of the 2008 Mumbai attacks as the country marked the third anniversary of the carnage that claimed 166 lives.
The 2008 attacks in Mumbai saw 10 heavily armed gunmen storm a host of targets including luxury hotels, a Jewish centre and a train station.
“We are still waiting for Pakistan to act decisively to bring to justice the perpetrators of the mindless violence that was unleashed on Mumbai,” Indian Foreign Minister SM Krishna told reporters in New Delhi.
Hamid Karzai said during a speech in Kabul that the Dec. 6 bombings were carried out by people seeking to undermine peace and stability. An extremist group in neighboring Pakistan has claimed responsibility for the deadliest of the attacks, a suicide bombing that targeted Shiite crowds gathered around a shrine in Kabul....
The Pakistani extremist group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi says it carried out the Kabul bombing, raising fears it was trying to stoke Shiite-Sunni tensions in Afghanistan. The group is blamed for many attacks on Shiites in its own country.
BEIJING: China has rushed thousands of special police forces to Urumqi, capital city of northwestern Xinjiang province, where it is battling to contain separatist East Turkestan militants, some of them trained in neighbouring Pakistan.
Thousands of special policemen have been transferred to Urumqi from the regional public security department, state-run Xinhua news agency reported without specifying the reasons for the deployment.
The fresh deployment would be in addition to stationing of Snow Leopards, China best known anti-terrorism unit in Urmuqi as well as in the border town of Kashghar, located close to the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK).
(Reuters) - Pakistan's security service provides weapons and training to Taliban insurgents fighting U.S. and British troops in Afghanistan, despite official denials, Taliban commanders say, in allegations that could worsen tensions between Pakistan and the United States.
A number of middle-ranking Taliban commanders revealed the extent of Pakistani support in interviews for a BBC Two documentary series, "Secret Pakistan," the first part of which was being broadcast on Wednesday.
old.news.yahoo.com...
BEIJING (AFP) – A deadly weekend attack in China's restive Xinjiang region was masterminded by "terrorists" trained in Pakistan, the local government said Monday....
Fourteen people were killed in two attacks at the weekend in the ancient Silk Road city of Kashgar, and five alleged attackers were in turn shot dead by police in the wave of violence.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by nenothtu
We did not create them. Pakistani ISI did. we should have never given Pakistan any money in the first place after they did that. Pak ISI created them, harbors them, and now apparently fights with them. You expect a man to harbor and defend his children, and that is precisely what Pakistan is doing in regards to the Taliban.
Did you just try to pass the buck on the fact that the CIA created Al Qaeda?
Read "Ghost Wars" by Steve Coll. Brzeninski also happened to be the American foreign policy "advisor" who directed the whole operation under the idea that backing a bunch of ragtag rebels in Afghanistan would break the Soviet Union. It worked.