Quarter-Billion Taxpayer Dollars Spent on Penis Pumps

news.heartland.org...enis-pumps

I don't know what topic this falls under but it is a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money. Is it really necessary for a 65 year old man to get an erection? Honestly I don't think I should be funding these operations. If a man is having this problem then he needs to man up and pay for his own operation or medication.

reply to post by demented


I don't think this qualifies as 'stimulating' the economy! Isn't viagra cheaper and just as effective?
Oh man, couldn't that money have been better spent? I am curious about medical conditions where treatment is refused, then compare it to this 'ailment.'

spec

reply to post by speculativeoptimist

Perhaps they have lobbyists in DC representing the Adult Industry just as much as the Lubricatin...errrr Crude Oil industry

Well it's cheaper and safer than prescription drugs. Do you agree?

If they were for senior Chippindale dancers would that be okay since strippers can write off breast implants as stage props ?

reply to post by hp1229

Perhaps they have lobbyists in DC representing the Adult Industry just as much as the Lubricatin...errrr Crude Oil industry

Now that right thar is funneeee!

reply to post by speculativeoptimist

Thanks.
Thats about the only thing we can do is poke humor and have a laugh at the stupidity of our dear politicians

reply to post by speculativeoptimist

Duplicate

reply to post by demented

Is it really necessary for a 65 year old man to get an erection?

Speaking as a very nearly 64 year old I would say that is a definite yes!

Well maybe not 'necessary' but certainly desirable. Any more of this ageist talk and I shall have to report you to the PTB. Let's face it most of them are as old as me and would probably agree that it is very neccessary!