Twisted thug feed's a kitten to python in a sick Video

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by nightstalker78

 

Thank you. I am glad someone is paying attention, and yeah, I'm done with this thread.
Anyone arguing that it's "natural" and a hipocrisy is just arguing because there is an argument to be made and they are wasting everyone's time. Everyone here knows what the guy did is wrong, it's only magnified and made more outrageous by the fact that the person has done it before and even worse as it served absolutely no purpose and was just senseless killing in the first vids.

Agreed. Hopefully this thread will be going away........

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by nightstalker78

 

Thank you. I am glad someone is paying attention, and yeah, I'm done with this thread.
Anyone arguing that it's "natural" and a hipocrisy is just arguing because there is an argument to be made and they are wasting everyone's time. Everyone here knows what the guy did is wrong, it's only magnified and made more outrageous by the fact that the person has done it before and even worse as it served absolutely no purpose and was just senseless killing in the first vids.

Agreed. Hopefully this thread will be going away........

Typical example of "trolling a thread to death"...you just need to check the last two pages. And yes, i am with those guys who wish a "ignore" function which is surprisingly not available on this site.

i found it hard not to punch my screen

reply to post by 31Bravo


Some of you people don't get it.Hunting and killing a deer or any other animal in the WILD is fine to me."Canned' hunts as they're called,are not.Feeding a snake that's in captivity a kitten is NOT ok.As has been pointed out many times in this thread,if the snake came across the kitten in its own habitat,people would be less outraged.It's the fact that this idiot filmed it and clearly took pleasure in feeding the kitten to the snake.

The International Business Times of UK, says this monster is suspected of operating from Islington and likes Disney movies like Aladin. Cant recall where I saw it, but there was mention of the swastika image too. This warped murderer is a real freak Here is a link to IBT but it's not for the faint of heart, there is detail of the entity's bizarre sadistic mockeries. It is deliberately wanting to shock and hurt all of us who swallowed It's red pill.
I want this thing CAPTURED.

uk.ibtimes.com...

IBT has posted the next doings of the monster, as also shown by a poster here in this thread on page 17, second post, I think. See, this is important, because they write that this entity promises more of this stuff. This link is also not for the faint of heart. I am faint of heart, but I am obsessed with the resolution of all this in Justice.
uk.ibtimes.com...

Originally posted by nightstalker78
reply to post by 31Bravo

 

Some of you people don't get it.Hunting and killing a deer or any other animal in the WILD is fine to me."Canned' hunts as they're called,are not.Feeding a snake that's in captivity a kitten is NOT ok.As has been pointed out many times in this thread,if the snake came across the kitten in its own habitat,people would be less outraged.It's the fact that this idiot filmed it and clearly took pleasure in feeding the kitten to the snake.

edit on 5-12-2011 by nightstalker78 because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-12-2011 by nightstalker78 because: (no reason given)

I can agree with your disgust on the filming of it.. but still food is food.

Originally posted by Noobastronomer
This is really heart breaking as well as disguisting. Who in their right mind would indulge in such a cruel act

A hunt has been launched for a sadistic pet owner who filmed himself feeding a kitten to a python.
The vile video, entitled Python Christmas, shows a man in his 20s carrying the kitten called Jasmine into a bedroom in a Santa hat and then placed on a bed.Lurking half-hidden under a pillow lay a yellow Burmese python, which can grow up to 19ft long and is one of the largest snakes in the world.

So let me get this straight. A serpent does something wrong and Man gets the blame this time?

Something is just too hilarious about this story.

With Love,

Your Brother

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Algernonsmouse

 

Yes you did.
You discussed the contents of the video casually. So you are implicating you saw it to make as stronger argument for some and saying you didn't to make an opposite argument for others.

No. The implication is all in your head. How many times did I say I never saw the video? How does this contradict that? It does not.

Here is the point. I already had this argument.
"It was his pet, it trusted him"
How do you know?
"If you watched the video...."

That is empty BS and I did not want to hear that one again. Either the poster was smart enough to read that I did nto see any evidence because I never saw the video or for the first time in this thread, that poster was going to do what no one else could and actually explain why he thinks it was that persons pet and trusted him.

Neither thing happened and I never contradicted myself. I Caught onto the games about 20 pages back.

I saw no evidence in the video that that cat was his pet nor that it had bonded with anyone.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Anyone with common sense knows that that implies that you watched the video.

Yup and what did that get ya?
Who is now arguing just to argue?

Originally posted by nightstalker78
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow

 

Yup,I agree with you,that quote implies he/she watched the video.But they'll still call you a liar though.I have a feeling you're wasting your time arguing with them.As for the op,it's sickening to me.Not because it's a kitten but as many others have said he clearly did this for his own pleasure.And from what I've read it isn't the first time.

If you can show where I contradicted myself, I would love to read it. If you and gogo have nothing better to argue about then the semantics used to avoid yet another repeated of the same stupid ass argument already had for 20 pages then I am quite glad to see who just likes to argue for the sake of arguing and who actually has a point in this thread.

I see a lot of wheel spinning at this point.

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
What about your pet dog?

For those advocating that this is okay... is it okay if we feed your puppy to the snake?

See, on each page now some person tries to steer the thread to the person and their other videos and what the cumulitve effect is. And that seems like a great topic and worthy of discussion. Unfortunately it is not the topic and there are far more arguments like this that bring it back to the absurd premise it is based on. "It is wrong becasue it is a cat and not a mouse or a rabbit."


What if it were my pet cat? That would be a problem because I love my pet cat. Just like my neice loves her pet rodent. Just like my friend loves her pet rabbits. Now what were you trying to say?

I think people who are saying that this is ok seem completely clueless as to the difference between an animal eating another animal in the wild and this situation. I keep a few reptiles and a snake and have kept a larger collection that has been lowered which did include numerous snakes and tarantulas and I have always believed that there is a duty of care that we, as Humans with the ability to do so, must undertake with any ownership of animals that we may claim. This includes how we feed them. There is absolutely no benefit to any animal in captivity to have live food with the exception or reptiles that feed on crickets and worms, but even they can often have a diet of vegetation if the right supplements are also given. Not only is it unnecessary, it is also cruel to the animal being fed as food and dangerous to the animal to which is being fed and shows a complete lack of education on how to look after such animals. The only time I would ever suggest it is if a snake or animal is not eating and is becoming ill, even then, to video it and post it on public domain is disgusting and shows a complete lack of respect and dignity.

This video (which I will not watch) simply shows a lust for inflciting control over another life, a lust for power over life and death and as such, a very twisted mind is behind it and somewhat ill informed one to a person that advocates such acts. It is very well documented that those that undertake such cruel activities often go on to inflict such agony on to Humans, Serial Killers are probably the most well documented of which they often undertake such sociopathic behaviour in the early years before moving on to Human victims.

Animals do indeed feed on animals and such is the way of nature, but what we are talking of here and all other videos similar to this, is a man made situation with an animal that is not included in the snake's regular diet anyway and even though I have yet to come across a python that has not eaten prekilled and even though they can be picky eaters, if it was a last resort to make the snake eat, why would you post the video on the internet or even record it? In the wild animals will often escape, there is no escape in these videos. In my opinion, these videos do nothing but serve to quench a sickening and dark desire by the person who is carrying out the deed and excite those who love to view such videos with equal pleasure. At the same time they serve to try and destroy those of us that keep these animals and actually look after them to a very high standard.

This is one person that I would love to meet in person!

reply to post by SecretFace


Yeah.. I meant to ask reptile owners earlier, but was sidetracked by lunacy in here.
I know snakes will eat dead things and I know that they prefer living. My question though is, will they eat dead animals regularly, or do they generally wait until they are hungry. Like will they avoid eating dead food in hopes for living prey if they are not particularly hungry at the time of feeding?

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by SecretFace

 

Yeah.. I meant to ask reptile owners earlier, but was sidetracked by lunacy in here.
I know snakes will eat dead things and I know that they prefer living. My question though is, will they eat dead animals regularly, or do they generally wait until they are hungry. Like will they avoid eating dead food in hopes for living prey if they are not particularly hungry at the time of feeding?

In my experience and from talking to many other reptile owners in the past, obviously more so with regards to snakes, but a common misconception is that a snake will only eat live animals. This is not true, in the wild it is so because generally that is what they will more often than not come across, but they will also eat dead animals that are generally intact, shall we say. A snake does not have the understanding of preference, a warmed up prekilled defrosted mouse/rat is the same as a live mouse/rat to the snake and the snake's instinct is the same, the snake will often strike feed, if the snake understood that the food was already dead it would understand not to strike. There is also a general understanding that this causes a lack of hunting instinct in the snake, first of all the snake does not understand captivity, it understands its surroundings and food placed within, as far as the snake is concerned, should be hunted and its movement and behaviour is exactly the same.

As I have said, there is no positive to feeding live mice, rats, or in this case a kitten to a snake except for some depraved pleasure. I have kept snakes for over 15 years now and I have never had trouble feeding. My list of snakes include/included Royals, Corn, Garter, Boas, Kings, Rat and a Burmese and I never had trouble feeding and all have gone on to live or are living very healthy lives. I've known keepers of DWA snakes (venomous snakes mostly) that have never needed to. There are instances that can result in the need to feed live prey due to not feeding, though I have not needed to do this, I have also known for it to still not work as the non-feeding is usually related to an underlying condition.

The bottom line is videos such as this are not necessary and even if you have to feed live food, why record it and distribute around the internet? Nature is nature, but this is sickening and I honestly believe that the Police should do more towards seriously looking in to these people because this type of behaviour is usually a prelude to just as sickening behaviour towards Humans.

Originally posted by IAMIAM

Originally posted by Noobastronomer
This is really heart breaking as well as disguisting. Who in their right mind would indulge in such a cruel act

A hunt has been launched for a sadistic pet owner who filmed himself feeding a kitten to a python.
The vile video, entitled Python Christmas, shows a man in his 20s carrying the kitten called Jasmine into a bedroom in a Santa hat and then placed on a bed.Lurking half-hidden under a pillow lay a yellow Burmese python, which can grow up to 19ft long and is one of the largest snakes in the world.

So let me get this straight. A serpent does something wrong and Man gets the blame this time?

Something is just too hilarious about this story.

With Love,

Your Brother

Yeeeeah...So let me get this straight, man takes the kitten and places it on the bed where he has already placed the Burm so that the Burm can attack, constrict and kill the kitten to eat and you're telling me he is not to blame? Also, at what point did the "serpent" do something wrong? It's natural instinct is to feed, by which it is to attack and feed on food that it knows it can take down. The "serpent" acted to the boundaries and height of its intellect, the man on the other hand did not. Now, who is to blame?....It's not a trick question, by the way!

Wow i learned so much from this thread about certain people....Thanks a lot for all your valuable inputs.......

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


Sankes do not eat if they are not hungry. You feed them on a schedule, not daily. Some snakes eat about once a week, some more often some less and it also depends on what you fed them. In the wild when hungry, they will go for the biggest meal they can because snakes are not fond of having to hunt for lots of little things to eat and digest. That is why snakes in the wild will eat cats in the wild.

reply to post by Algernonsmouse


I know all this, by getting hungry I meant if it was closer to feeding time. What I said wouldn't have made the least amount of since if I thought snakes ate daily. I think I even mentioned that I thought bigger prey would only be needed 2 or 3 times a month.

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Algernonsmouse

 

I know all this, by getting hungry I meant if it was closer to feeding time.

That sentence makes no sense. Why did you ask if you knew?

What I said wouldn't have made the least amount of since if I thought snakes ate daily.

Right and it did not make sense because they do not eat daily. What is your issue now?

I think I even mentioned that I thought bigger prey would only be needed 2 or 3 times a month.

Not in that post I responded to. If you are going to get upset when someone answers your question for you then you should probably not ask.

I answered your question. I have no idea what this response is abouit.