Mars Concepcion' Crater Anomalies. An Intelligent Designed Object and A Skull

Originally posted by Hundroid


look at the stone just right below the "skull", it seems to me a kind of mile stone or something you would lie on a grave, I circled it in red (with Paint)




What do you think?? I see some straight lines and a perfect arch

Well, if a spherical rock is an skull, I would say that other thing is a piece of fossilised martian cheese.

reply to post by rdunk

You did indeed pick the right word Its not one that is really in my dictionary or rolls off my tongue easily. Anyway, a quick google reveals this one colourised "skull" photo. I have no idea if it is the same skull as in the crater you are referring to but in black and white picks I discovered at least 3. Anyway, this is just to give an idea and there is little detail of the surrounding area so which skull it is might be anyone's guess.



ETA Here's another skull near a different (Gusev?) crater. It certainly is strange at the least. Good luck with the quest.



And the page it came from is site with a skull picture

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by rdunk

 

You did indeed pick the right word

Its not one that is really in my dictionary or rolls off my tongue easily. Anyway, a quick google reveals this one colourised "skull" photo. I have no idea if it is the same skull as in the crater you are referring to but in black and white picks I discovered at least 3. Anyway, this is just to give an idea and there is little detail of the surrounding area so which skull it is might be anyone's guess.

Holy cow, that is not an skull, is a panda! is that in mars?, are panda martians? is he holding his heart?

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by rdunk

 

You did indeed pick the right word

Its not one that is really in my dictionary or rolls off my tongue easily. Anyway, a quick google reveals this one colourised "skull" photo. I have no idea if it is the same skull as in the crater you are referring to but in black and white picks I discovered at least 3. Anyway, this is just to give an idea and there is little detail of the surrounding area so which skull it is might be anyone's guess.

....................................................................................................................
Thanks LightSpeed, yes I have see that one before too. i don't remember where it came from, but it too has a skull appearance.

I've enjoyed going through your wonderful post. How debunkers can say all this is rock is mind blowing to me.

Like Nasa saying this is a rock when to me it clearly looks like an ancient piece of wood.
I have to honestly think that there is a civilization living underground and nasa is in direct contact and doesn't want to let it out except in small drips and drabs. Mainly because they think it would destabilize so many millions of lives. Just a theory!
Gotta really wonder if Ernest Norman really had mental telepathy with martians and Gary Wilcox really did talk to two martians on his farm in 1964, April 24th. when their oval shaped craft came down and later than day Lonnie Zamora spotted the same martian craft in New Mexico when he was a policeman. Just a theory. I am just amazed how very well Nasa is keeping it a grand secret. I honestly have to wonder that they must be in direct contact with them.. If a farmer can talk man to man (martian), why can't nasa 10 fold?. Just a theory

Wood not rock
marsrover.nasa.gov...

Why is it we can spend billions of dollars on getting craft to other planets,but no matter what,the resolution on pictures from the surface is still crap?

reply to post by Cygnus_Hunter

Hehe, try this. This guy is pretty knowledgeable about all this stuff. Keith Laney. He does not do "grainy" from what I've seen and explains it all quite well too.

Good Mars Photos and Lots of Them

ETA All custom imagery use restricted without permission. All rights reserved

Hence I didn't link any of his photos, just the site itself. He has many photos of many different things, not just Mars and he appears to be quite the expert too. Its a cool site he has.


reply to post by thetiler


Whatever it is, I love the colours! Good find!

reply to post by MonteroReal

I don't know about panda's but yes, the image is an artificially coloured version of an object on Mars to help make it clearer

Originally posted by thetiler
I've enjoyed going through your wonderful post. How debunkers can say all this is rock is mind blowing to me.

Like Nasa saying this is a rock when to me it clearly looks like an ancient piece of wood.
I have to honestly think that there is a civilization living underground and nasa is in direct contact and doesn't want to let it out except in small drips and drabs. Mainly because they think it would destabilize so many millions of lives. Just a theory!
Gotta really wonder if Ernest Norman really had mental telepathy with martians and Gary Wilcox really did talk to two martians on his farm in 1964, April 24th. when their oval shaped craft came down and later than day Lonnie Zamora spotted the same martian craft in New Mexico when he was a policeman. Just a theory. I am just amazed how very well Nasa is keeping it a grand secret. I honestly have to wonder that they must be in direct contact with them.. If a farmer can talk man to man (martian), why can't nasa 10 fold?. Just a theory

...................................................................................................................
Hi thetiler! Thanks for your comments. Yes, I feel the same as you sometimes, when I get a "nothing but rocks" comment. However, I do think that the debunking comments do cause some of us to try to be more disciplined in our selection of anomalies to post. I believe that is a good thing!

Yes, there is a fair amount of evidence that NASA is not/may not be publishing the truth relative to their findings in space exploration/etc. Yes, one of these days it is all going to come out!


Wood not rock

marsrover.nasa.gov...

edit on 3-12-2011 by thetiler because: spelling

reply to post by rdunk


IMHO: I can see the skull, but my opinion is that its a natural formation... what interests me more are numbers 3 and 4 in the same picture (circled in yellow):

Link to image



I added number 1 to show the grain of that rock running at the opposite angle to 3 and 4; and number 2 is just a funny looking rock

Originally posted by Hundroid
reply to post by rdunk

 

Thanks rdunk (did you invert the first two letters of your nick? LOL)

By looking better at the pic with the supposed skull, I found something more intriguing IMMO:

look at the stone just right below the "skull", it seems to me a kind of mile stone or something you would lie on a grave, I circled it in red (with Paint)






What do you think?? I see some straight lines and a perfect arch

Nature makes straight lines in rocks, I really wish we would find something I do but it's like looking at the clouds and making images our brain does it.
here look at the giants causeway
www.northantrim.com...

Originally posted by StrangeCottageCheese
reply to post by rdunk

 

IMHO: I can see the skull, but my opinion is that its a natural formation... what interests me more are numbers 3 and 4 in the same picture (circled in yellow):

Link to image

I added number 1 to show the grain of that rock running at the opposite angle to 3 and 4; and number 2 is just a funny looking rock.
.................................................................................................................................
Hi StrangeCottageCheese, thanks for your comments. I am glad that you see the skull, but I am not sure just why you think it is a natural formation. It doesn't look very "natural". If you are a bit on the skeptic side, then I guess I would "understand" why. And that is your prerogative! You didn't mention the other anomaly, how about that one?

I am surprised that you can see things in the rocks you circled, but have problems with the anomalies in the OP. One thing for sure, there are anomalies all over this place. And because of that, many of the "rocks" to be seen, such as your #2, seem to be pieces of a civilized manufacturing process. #2 is not a solid rock, as one can see it has "walls" on each side, and also has a front wall and a back wall. This is an obvious anomaly piece out of the ejecta. Thanks for posting it!!!

reply to post by rdunk



files.abovetopsecret.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Its this guys ex-girlfriend.

Good Find! I love going thru Mars images to see what "anomalies" I can find.

reply to post by boymonkey74


Nature makes straight lines in rocks, I really wish we would find something I do but it's like looking at the clouds and making images our brain does it.
here look at the giants causeway
www.northantrim.com...
.............................................................................................................
boymonkey, thanks for your comments! I do "wish" you could see this too!!! I am not sure what you mean, in mentioning "Nature makes straight lines in rocks", relative to the OP anomalies. That is because, neither of these two anomalous objects has a straight line in it, anywhere. The "designed anomaly" has very curvy lines, it has depth, shows a triangle shape for the arrow head, has a circular ring on the left end of the horizontal piece, and etc.. This can be nothing other than an intelligent design d and manufactured item.

Now, where did this intelligent designed item come from?? Is it from life here/Mars, at what may be a burial site, or some type of memorial site?? Did someone bring it here, from somewhere else. Could this be a "trophy" from Earth someone just picked up and brought here?? A lot of questions relative to sites like this - and there are more sites, than just this one - but not many answers, especially not from NASA, and its "partners"!

boymonkey, I did look at the link you provided, but for some reason, I just couldn't make a relationship of it to our discussion. I saw the water, and I saw the geology, but saw nothing different or unusual about it.

Thanks again!!

Originally posted by overseer1136
reply to post by rdunk

 

files.abovetopsecret.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Its this guys ex-girlfriend.

Good Find! I love going thru Mars images to see what "anomalies" I can find.

......................................................................................................................
Hey overseer, good to meet you and thanks for the comment! "This guys ex-girl friend" -

I am with you regarding looking for the "Mars Anomalies'! We are actually being told nothing about what is on Mars, except mostly "piddly stuff", that really makes no difference. There is so much more that should be told to us, because the anomalies are there as proof-of-life signs. And I am just talking about the anomalies we can see - most of the anomalies have been tampered-out or covered up during process of the MOC and Rover photos.

Anyway, keep looking for anomalies, and post them for the rest of us, when you can!

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Cygnus_Hunter

 

Hehe, try this. This guy is pretty knowledgeable about all this stuff. Keith Laney. He does not do "grainy" from what I've seen and explains it all quite well too.

Good Mars Photos and Lots of Them

ETA All custom imagery use restricted without permission. All rights reserved

Hence I didn't link any of his photos, just the site itself. He has many photos of many different things, not just Mars and he appears to be quite the expert too. Its a cool site he has.

edit on 3/12/11 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA

reply to post by thetiler

 

Whatever it is, I love the colours! Good find!

edit on 3/12/11 by LightSpeedDriver because: Added a reply to previous poster

...........................................................................................................
Thanks so much LightSpeedDriver for the link to the Keith Laney site. Another place to get helpful pics in our search for anomalous objects.

reply to post by rdunk

You are more than welcome. Keith Laney is a good truth seeker.

reply to post by rdunk


I also believe that there is SOOOOO much more on the surface and it is right in front of our eyes but you just have to look at the right angles and light.They manipulate the color of the surface first above all (in videos & pics) - that hides much of what is hidden in plain sight just like they do on the surface of the moon.It does show characteristics of a humanoid skull just look at the bridge of the nose... nice catch..

Originally posted by patmac573
reply to post by rdunk

 

I also believe that there is SOOOOO much more on the surface and it is right in front of our eyes but you just have to look at the right angles and light.They manipulate the color of the surface first above all (in videos & pics) - that hides much of what is hidden in plain sight just like they do on the surface of the moon.It does show characteristics of a humanoid skull just look at the bridge of the nose... nice catch..

.............................................................................................................
You are SOOOOO right patmac! If we knew everything they did to the photos, we probably would be flabbergasted. I have the evidence that I will post here, sometime soon, that clearly (to me) shows changes made to a later Sol day Rover photo, when compared to an earlier Sol day - the same rocks, with some significantly changes. in the photos.

The skull is a little easier to see in this post, but the second anomaly is more telling relative to civilized life. Did you see that one also??

Thanks for your comments!

Originally posted by rdunk
I am glad that you see the skull, but I am not sure just why you think it is a natural formation.

rdunk, why is it so difficult for you to understand the concept of pareidolia?