Republican Jewish Coalition Bars Ron Paul From Presidential Debate

geeeez who wudda thunked...lol
RP will hack whack and cut socalled foreign aid.

reply to post by Sherlock Holmes


Or, you know, you could protest....The American way.


I would think that discrimination would demand an opposite organization to counter.

Discrimination, in any form, supported by the government, has never ended well. You'll sooner see "no republican/democrat" signs in front of stores, and few people protesting, under the way things are now.

Without the government, it is purely in the hands of the civilian population. And they can handle it themselves in a civil and orderly manner.

Businesses should have the right to do business with who they want and hire who they want. If this in any way violates the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, then you take it up with the courts or protest the store. The common decency of the American citizenry will right the wrong.

This is all the more reason needed to make him President of the United States.....It's funny how a candidate who was pretty much written off at the beginning of all this is slowly making his way up the back stretch to become the front-runner....I hope he wins the republican ticket over Newt and he can persuade enough people to vote for him in 2012. If he wins the whole Arab-Israeli conflict will end quite abruptly since the U.S. will not be giving them any more money to prop up the jewish state...........That's what they are afraid of.....

The proper and decent thing to do, would have been for every one of the candidates reject the invitation. Of course, why would self-centered candidates who are only concerned about one thing, winning, do that? It shows a complete lack of character on the part of those that accepted the invitation.
How quickly people forget the words of Pastor Niemöller:

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

en.wikipedia.org...

Of course, he was talking about the death camps.
It TRULY is ironic that the "they" in this modern day tale is a Jewish group. You would have thought, that of all groups, they would have been more sensitive to what they did.

Those who fail to learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them.

Sad, truly sad.

Great Article on Lew Rockwell by Walter Block who is a Jew explaining all Dr. Paul's view points on Israel. Walter Block: "For one thing, Ron Paul espouses a policy of ending all U.S. transfers of funds to foreign nations; since the Arab countries, all together, receive far more than does Israel, although this "hurts" (read Peter T. Bauer for an explanation of these scare quotes) Israel absolutely, it helps that country relative to its enemies. Jews are supposed to have great intelligence, and they do. But sufficient to grasp this admittedly complicated point (I’m kidding, here)? Evidently, not enough of this intellectual ability has percolated down into the membership and leadership of the RJC. I wonder; given their obtuseness, are they real Jews? Surely, Israel’s absolute power to impose its will is as nothing compared to its power relative to that of its enemies."lewrockwell.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Walter Block on Lew Rockwell

Why do most Jews continue to vote Liberal Democrat when the policies of these Liberals do the most harm for Israel? I have read it is due to their hate for Christians.

reply to post by Trustme333


Dude, you can't paint a people with a broad brush. It's not "Jewish" it's "zionist."

As Paul supporters, we have to say no to the cancerous political ideology known as "zionism."

Time to teach the zionists a lesson. Boycott zionist companies and individuals from our shopping list. Remove the zionist from our circle of friends. Demand the end to dual citizenship and let's see how the cockroaches run when exposed to the light.

This is an obvious sign of fear. Why do they fear him? Because he could destroy their entire scheme by auditing the giant squid err um I mean fed.

You americans are owned by Israel. The american has always been a coward and always will be. You can't breeak free.

Jews are criminals and theifs.

reply to post by xuenchen


Call the Anti Boycott Alliance?

F _ C K Y O _

You wanna buy a vowel?

Originally posted by Gorman91
The common decency of the American citizenry will right the wrong.

That didn't exactly work the first time, otherwise there would have been no need to force Americans to behave in a more decent manner by introducing the Civil Rights Act in the first place.

If, as Paul and others naively believe, that these things will just right themselves without the need for legislation to protect the minority from socialised mob-rule, then why were many parts of the US still living under an apartheid-based society until they were forced not to in the 1960s ?

Originally posted by beijingyank
reply to post by xuenchen

 

Call the Anti Boycott Alliance?

F _ C K Y O _

You wanna buy a vowel?

ya, that's telling them !!

just make sure ya call from a payphone and wear a good disguise

reply to post by Sherlock Holmes


The civil rights act wouldn't have been needed if things took their course and elected officials favored equity and talked about it more. I don't really recall nearly as much commotion with woman's rights and the vote, and they have been oppressed for as long as mankind could think.

The civil rights act was the never-surprising pretend-we-care-but-don't response from government.

This country didn't need a civil rights act for the Irish, for the Italians, for the Germans, for the Chinese, for the Japanese, etc etc. Because the common decency of the citizenry accepted these people in due time.

The reason why it never happened for the blacks as it did with all the aforementioned is beyond me. I'm sure I could think of a few reasons, but overall, I don't care to waste time in such things.

You make a man dependent on the government for fetching his rights, and you destroy that man's rights. Make a man dependent on himself and his brothers for his rights, and the American citizenry will absorb him.

There was a time, shortly after the civil war, where blacks started becoming politicians, businessmen, etc etc. The same pattern for the Irish and Italians. What happened to stop this is beyond me. But I would ask you to ponder thins. In 1993 there was a TV show that showed a wealthy successful black family taking in a kid from the inner streets, and the show watched that young man grow up into the successful family and become just as awesome as they were. Why are such shows not on any more?

Interesting that the same "tribe" that is blocking Ron Paul right now pushed the whole civil rights issue and made sure it became federal law.

They also dominated the women's movement, abortion and gun control, demand aid to Israel and conned us into Iraq and Afghanistan.

Not really much of a mystery as to why they are doing everything in their power (and God knows they have power) to make sure Ronnie is not only not nominated but not even heard from.

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Sherlock Holmes

 

The civil rights act wouldn't have been needed if things took their course and elected officials favored equity and talked about it more. I don't really recall nearly as much commotion with woman's rights and the vote, and they have been oppressed for as long as mankind could think.

The civil rights act was the never-surprising pretend-we-care-but-don't response from government.

This country didn't need a civil rights act for the Irish, for the Italians, for the Germans, for the Chinese, for the Japanese, etc etc. Because the common decency of the citizenry accepted these people in due time.

The reason why it never happened for the blacks as it did with all the aforementioned is beyond me. I'm sure I could think of a few reasons, but overall, I don't care to waste time in such things.

You make a man dependent on the government for fetching his rights, and you destroy that man's rights. Make a man dependent on himself and his brothers for his rights, and the American citizenry will absorb him.

There was a time, shortly after the civil war, where blacks started becoming politicians, businessmen, etc etc. The same pattern for the Irish and Italians. What happened to stop this is beyond me. But I would ask you to ponder thins. In 1993 there was a TV show that showed a wealthy successful black family taking in a kid from the inner streets, and the show watched that young man grow up into the successful family and become just as awesome as they were. Why are such shows not on any more?

reply to post by BRAVO949


That's a generalization. It's not like a tribe of people are unilaterally in agreement as to how to proceed.

There's a group of rich men who want more money.

God spoke of such men. They are called worshipers of Mammon.

This pretty well means they fear RP and his millions of followers

Supposedly, the purpose of forums and debates is to air the candidates views, challenge those views and listen to the response the candidates give.
Obviously, this Jewish group does not WANT to hear anyone that opposes their views or interests. In that respect, then, this "forum" is nothing more than a propaganda scam for Jewish interest groups, and as such, violates the equal access norms that the US election commissions have put in place. This group skirts closely to violating Section 315 of the U.S. Broadcasting Regulatory Rule, which states that

The equal time, or more accurately, the equal opportunity provision of the Communications Act requires radio and television stations and cable systems which originate their own programming to treat legally qualified political candidates equally when it comes to selling or giving away air time. Simply put, a station which sells or gives one minute to Candidate A must sell or give the same amount of time with the same audience potential to all other candidates for the particular office.

www.museum.tv...

Since C-SPAN is TELEVISING this "Forum", it brings up the relevancy of section 315 of the the same act. Cable channels are not exempt from section 315.

In the case of Dennis J. Kucinich v. Cable News Network and Time Warner, Inc., although the FCC ruled that Kucinich was not entitled to be in the debate:

As a threshold matter, the Commission does not have authority to grant Kucinich’s request that the Commission order CNN to include him in the subject debate. As stated previously, the Commission is prohibited from engaging in activities that might be regarded as censorship of programming content. Requiring a particular candidate to be included in a debate would constitute such activity and, therefore, is prohibited.

transition.fcc.gov...
HOWEVER,
IT DID STATE:

the cable operator or broadcast station is only obligated to afford equal opportunities to the candidate; the candidate is not entitled to appear in the same program as his opponent.

ibid

Thus, although technically, Ron Paul can be excluded, he MUST be given equal time on CSPAN.

We all understand that this will never happen.
In addition, we all know why,

Anyone can comment on Chinese manufacturing.

Anyone can talk about Japanese technology.

Anyone can discuss Russian espionage.

Anyone can bring up the Mexican drug wars.

But, but, but...

The minute anyone mentions Jewish control of international finance, the media in the US, Jewish control of the abortion and porn industries and that fact that Congress and the Executive Branch are being strangled by pro-Zionist war-mongers forcing us into war with Iran - that is a generalization.

Excuse me?! Talk about control. They even control the words we use and what we say.

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by BRAVO949

 

That's a generalization. It's not like a tribe of people are unilaterally in agreement as to how to proceed.

There's a group of rich men who want more money.

God spoke of such men. They are called worshipers of Mammon.

Fox just went to the debate right before who's going to speak? Newt Gingrich!

Tell me the fix isn't in!

Tell me the fix isn't in!

reply to post by maddog99

No one can, because you are correct.

reply to post by BRAVO949


I'm a Christian. And I'm a Zionist. Unlike Jews, those things are not mixed. Christians don't have any scriptural proof for a Jewish State. In fact, if anything, it seems to suggest that Christians turn the world into a religious state.

Not everyone in the world is what you think.

Get out of the house some more.