It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In its ruling, the court said the man’s wife deserved the damages due to the suffering she endured because of her sexless marriage.
“The wife’s expectations were legitimate in the sense that sexual relations between married people are an expression of their mutual affection and part of the duties that proceed from marriage,” the court said.
It dismissed the husband’s argument that health problems and long working hours had simply reduced the opportunities for the couple to have sex.
The court ruled that he had not proved “any health problems that would make him completely incapable of having intimate relations with his wife.”