Techgnosticism

Techgnosticism

To keep your thread from being closed by mods, i suggest adding some substance and thoughts.

I'll do it instead.

Tekgnosticisim: etymology; Tech: abbreviation of the English technology - derived from the Greek “technelogia”, techne meaning “art, skill, craft” and Logia meaning “study of”.
Gnostic: from gnostikos “learned” from Greek gnosis meaning “intuitive esoteric knowledge” in English the term is implored to refer to enlightenment as by the methods of early Gnostic's of Christian mysticism whom were deemed heretics for claiming gnosis; first hand spiritual wisdom/intuitive knowledge as the only means of salvation opposed to “pistis” (faith) with which the Christian Fore fathers Church was intent on decisions to exclude many gnostic scriptures during the canonicalisation of scriptures that became the Bible. Hence Christianity being the primary religion in which the English noun Gnosticism is used by theosophists. It was however from Gnosticisme coined by Henry More a 16th century platonic philosopher for his cometary on the 7 letters of the Book of revelations.

It's quite an interesting read, maybe the mods can keep it open instead of punishing the one word opening post?

Nah, I think his thread deserves to be closed as a lesson to be learned

Originally posted by Nick_X
Nah, I think his thread deserves to be closed as a lesson to be learned

The OP is a new member, let's lead by example and discuss the thread instead of wanting to instantly punish him eh?

Sorry for off topic. Once i've read through the post i'll be certain to comment.

reply to post by mr-lizard


Dear mr-lizard,

Out of respect of your willingness to discuss the topic, I will chime in. As for the OP, I could not complain if the mods did kill it, it is probably the worst OP I have read as it said nothing. There is no perspective to respond to, it is an approach that cannot be allowed often. On second thought, this thread should be closed. mr-lizard, I suggest that you start a thread on the subject as you are capable of writing and taking a position. Be well.

reply to post by AQuestion


I can see how chatting off-topic would really help this thread! Bravo! I also understand why you guys believe this thread should be closed in terms of teaching him a lesson. That would definitely let him know what he did wrong, because, it's not like somebody already respectfully explained to him his faults. Oh wait... would you look at that. Somebody already did!

Not everything has to be a debate. He could be kindly supplying you with a wealthy source of knowledge. I have briefly glanced at the post he listed and it seems to have very interesting point of views. If it is anything like ancient Gnosticism's take on the metaphysical, then I will surely be excited. Thank you, Spiratio. However, you did give us a textless post which is generally unacceptable, I thank you for turning me on to this.

Excerpted from the OP's link,

Now the 144000 Lesser Christ's were able to enter the BPR of the matrix induction chambers via the Yugic closure intersection (inverse tangent) parallel cosm related to Christ's matrix BPR.

Well the only thing I can say is this is all hogwash. Except for the Matrix part because the Matrix is real.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


Why is this all "hogwash"? I am interested in understanding why you think that. I would never wish to be duped, after all!

reply to post by ErroneousDylan


Because it's non-sensical! From the OP's link....

.....slumbering bodies of the CS in the IPC became more diluted and at this point were essentially like spirits to those on the rim/outer bands of the OZ. As such those on the OZ Rim knew of this by proxy of their Akashic connection to the HAR positive polarity emanations into the BPR. On the contrary the emanations in the BPR being of lesser potency than their original IPC/HAR/AP psyches...

Sounds like Scientology or some other sci-fi based fantasy belief system. And I say that for several reasons.
1. It's too complex beyond the need to be informative about the structure of reality, which is relatively simple.
2. It's uses too much specialized acronyms, buzz words, made up words, etc...
3. It's entirely subjective to the user.


See? it's hogwash because the theory doesn't answer questions it only creates confusion! Another example.

Therefore because in the 4D Macro-Akashic level of each Imploversial Cosm, exist an infinite number of Infinitive-waveforms Iw's, a single timeline continuum can exist as a blueprint on a single Iw that is an informational nexus, which converges the appropriate corresponding Iw's in linear 3D experiential space, whereby a string of possible events are imprinted as a static unalterable continuum on a single channel/Iw of a given Imploversial Scope.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


Ah, I do see your point. However, I have to assume that it could be relative to something that explains these acronyms and "made up" words that we have just not witnessed yet. Not that I am disputing you, I just give the benefit of the doubt and say innocent until proven guilty!

reply to post by ErroneousDylan


I'm not saying that nothing can't be learned from this material - but - if the material uses terms like "Imploversial Scope" then it means that the writer is unable to communicate with the average person... e.g., myself.

And to me the barrier in communication in the OP's message tells me that the system devised and called "Techgnosticism" is probably another dead end. Our life is too short to follow on dead ends.

Originally posted by Nick_X
Nah, I think his thread deserves to be closed as a lesson to be learned

Nick_X, I think you are not supposed to teach anything to anyone. May be presumption.. yes, that you could. But poors men already have it and others don' t want.
So keep it for yourself and try to learn respect instead of teaching.

Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

 

Ah, I do see your point. However, I have to assume that it could be relative to something that explains these acronyms and "made up" words that we have just not witnessed yet. Not that I am disputing you, I just give the benefit of the doubt and say innocent until proven guilty!

Firstly Thank you all with positive comments

ED: Correct you are. if you read the synopsis and intro carefully you would have noticed there is an entire thread describing the tetra-dimensional torus of Imploversial physics, advocated as a prerequisite to fathom Techgnosticism

reply to post by Spiratio

tetra-dimensional torus of Imploversial physics, advocated as a prerequisite to fathom Techgnosticism

No. This is all fantasy techno garbage. The Techgnosticism language is too complicated. It will fail.

Not sure if anyone noticed but the thread is contianed within the 'Philosophy, Religion & Society' section of the
Flat Earth Society Forum.

Complex language or not, I would definitely be reading this one with a grain of salt....

Originally posted by 1littlewolf
Not sure if anyone noticed but the thread is contianed within the 'Philosophy, Religion & Society' section of the
Flat Earth Society Forum.

Complex language or not, I would definitely be reading this one with a grain of salt....

edit on 30/11/2011 by 1littlewolf because: (no reason given)

I believe the forum name is simply a joke. So far, as I've read, there is a lot of talk about how the "shape" of the Universe is actually toroidal. "Torus" So, it would be pretty comical to name it something like that given their topic of discussion.

Originally posted by 1littlewolf
Not sure if anyone noticed but the thread is contianed within the 'Philosophy, Religion & Society' section of the
Flat Earth Society Forum.

Complex language or not, I would definitely be reading this one with a grain of salt....

edit on 30/11/2011 by 1littlewolf because: (no reason given)

I believe the forum name is simply a joke. So far, as I've read, there is a lot of talk about how the "shape" of the Universe is actually toroidal. "Torus" So, it would be pretty comical to name it something like that given their topic of discussion.

EDIT: Not sure what's up with the double post. A moderator may remove this.

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by Spiratio

 

tetra-dimensional torus of Imploversial physics, advocated as a prerequisite to fathom Techgnosticism

No. This is all fantasy techno garbage. The Techgnosticism language is too complicated. It will fail.

There is no such thing as failure only limitation of those unwilling to venture outside the box...

First of all if oneself are unable to contend with the notion of infinite possibilities then you best stay away from writings I post they will hurt your head and its why I include disclaimers.

The FES is not a joke, there are some who believe the earth is exclusively flat...myself however...I perceive it as omni...all conceivable shapes all at once. Each in a different cosmos which has more or less the same continuum of consensus reality...

There are some Round worlds where the majority believed it to be flat. There are other's where it is round and also believed by most to be round.

There are some flat worlds where the illusion of the Round earth perspectives of concave/convex worlds exist and few know it is flat and then there are those where it is flat and it is known to be flat.

First of all if oneself are unable to contend with the notion of infinite possibilities then you best stay away from writings I post they will hurt your head and its why I include disclaimers.

The FES is not a joke, there are some who believe the earth is exclusively flat...myself however...I perceive it as omni...all conceivable shapes all at once. Each in a different cosmos which has more or less the same continuum of consensus reality...

There are some Round worlds where the majority believed it to be flat. There are other's where it is round and also believed by most to be round.

There are some flat worlds where the illusion of the Round earth perspectives of concave/convex worlds exist and few know it is flat and then there are those where it is flat and it is known to be flat.