Battlefield US: Americans face arrest as war criminals under Army state law.

Originally posted by yourmaker
God bless the USA?

Nowadays its more like God help the USA.

reply to post by chrismicha77


Wrong.

reply to post by BadNinja68


So they tell you it's not for Amercians, doesn't mean it's true. If this country didn't have so many sheeple then they would see what's going on.

reply to post by chrismicha77


I wonder if you have ever heard of the oathkeepers?
Like someone posted earlier I would be more concerned
about how the police act then the military!

Originally posted by BadNinja68

Originally posted by XPLodER
your congress has 8% aproval rating and declears war on its own people,
if this passes it will be proof positive that the power deligated by the people to wage war has been perverted.

and they will have NO ligitamite power over you.
in this specific case, the milatary has the duty to imprison the people who wrote the law not the citizens.

but that leaves the military in control,
it sounds like your govenment is about to conduct war on its own people.

do not give the military a fight, give them a civics lesson.

xploder

From my understanding this bill is actually being renewed.
It has been passed before.

Fear mongering is abundant here..
It does not apply to US citizens on US soil.

section 1032, subsection (b)(1):
The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.
subsection (b)(2):
The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.

Source: www.reddit.com...

1032 DOES NOT say that US citizens are exempt only that the REQUIREMENT to hold them is.

SEC. 1032. REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUSTODY.

1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (4), the Armed Forces of the United States SHALL hold a person described in paragraph (2) who is captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) in military custody pending disposition under the law of war.

(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The REQUIREMENT to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.

further more 1031 does not exempt US citizens

SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

(b) Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.

where in that definition does it say except US citizens??

Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by chrismicha77

 

Wrong.

Wrong? How do you figure that?