It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It could be differences in brightness on those areas of the ground, most likely resulting from erosion, I have that kind of "feature" on many Mars photos.
Originally posted by rdunk
First, I am going to suggest that the CTX photo of this site shows considerable tampering. And, the first question would be, just why do you think that? And my answer would be, because I can see it!! Look at the anomaly screenshot - do you see all of that "white/grayish angel-hair" looking stuff?? What do you think that could be, other than "tampering"?
Why would it be plant life?
We are told that Mars has no plant growth, so, it could not be from any type of plant life.
How do you know that there aren't any spiders/giant spiders?
There are no spiders/giant spiders, so, it is not a mass of spider webs.
No need for hairy rocks (and there is at least one hairy rock, asbestos)
And thus far in my research, I have not found any type of hairy rock(s). So, what is it???
I seriously doubt it, as I don't believe that if there was someone tampering images at NASA or any of the other organisations that work with NASA in the various mission, I don't think they would give the work to a person or to a team and didn't bother to have someone else doing quality checking of their work.
It is possible the dome was intended to be covered, but that part of the application did not take???
Supposedly...
Originally posted by rdunk
ArMaP, supposedly, according to NASA, there is no known organic or biologic life on Mars, so there cannot be any giant spiders!
Why, do you think nature is not capable of doing things that look like that at a distance?
So, this type of hairy/thatchy stuff, which can be found in a lot of places on this planet would seem to default to some type of tampering.
I know you are, but I was talking about getting a better version of the image in the Opening Post by looking at the original IMG file instead of a JPG or whatever, and trying to do some processing on that original, but unfortunately, it looks like the original image was not that good, with too few shades of grey to trying to get a better image, at least without really knowing what I am doing.
By the way, I am the OP, and i can't find any better pics. And actually, the pic we have are about as good as it gets anyway.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
We see what we want to see, hence the dome and the 7 and the P. I see none of it. On a side note can't wait for curiosity to land.