It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
Did you forget about the "ancient homeland" component? The fact that that region of the world was the traditional homeland of the Jews since the BC era?
Originally posted by Frira
Absolutely-- get it out of the midst of the 9th Century which surrounds it.
As a Texan, I recommend Oklahoma.
Then again, I hear Libya and Egypt are each looking for a new government so maybe one of those would be a good choice?
But seriously, what is really needed is a New Jerusalem. That, and that alone, will resolve this once and for all.
Originally posted by darrman
reply to post by rigel4
wow,, what a tangled MESS of opinion...
yes it would be nice to "move" another SOVEREIGN Country .. but it doesn't work.. people don't want to move..
if we offered the Palestinians a huge chunk of ,, say,, UTAH.. they would not take it....(would YOU?)
moving anyone is a bad idea..... NICE!!! but still Wrong...
sometimes~~~~ Being NICE,, is the Wrong thing to do...IMHO..
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Won't work. God gave that land to the Jews. It is their land, not yours to give away or take away.
Originally posted by Frira
Absolutely-- get it out of the midst of the 9th Century which surrounds it.
As a Texan, I recommend Oklahoma.
Yes. Move them all to Antarctica. That would solve so many issues.
Originally posted by rigel4
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
I disagree.
Why is is that Israel should have to move?
Israel was created in 1947. Thats not very long ago hitorically speaking.
Would you rather the entire middle east moved?
It's a good thought but it still comes from someone who knows nothing of the real spiritual significance and purpose of Israel.