It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From Center for Strategic and International Studies csis.org...
This morning, the Xinhua News Agency and RIA Novosti bothcited reports from the Russian business daily Vedomosti that the Russian government plans large increases in defense spending by 2013. According to RIA Novosti, Russian defense spending will increase by 60 percent, to more than 2 trillion rubles ($66.3 [billion]) by 2013 from 1.264 trillion ($42 [billion]) in 2010. The spending will be spread out over three years. The largest increase will occur in 2013, when the budget is expected to jump by 500 billion rubles ($16.6 billion). According to RIA Novosti Konstantin Makiyenko from the Russian Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST) told the paper that the government is likely to spend more on the Navy, as well as the aviation and space industries. The Russians have planned expensive modernizations in these sectors. and are reported to have allocated funding for a variety of new naval vessels and aircraft. In the naval arena, the increased funds will go towards a whole scale modernization of Russia’s aging submarine and Black Sea fleets, including new Yasen and Borei class submarines, Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missiles, three new Talwar class frigates, three Improved Kilo class subs and up to four Mistral class amphibious assault ships. The Russian government plans to purchase two of the Mistral class amphibious assault ships/helicopter carriers from France and acquire the license to build two more of the vessels domestically. While the announcement of the Mistral class purchases is not new, they will likely continue to provoke worries in the United States and in NATO. When details of the specific purchase emerged earlier this month, the BBC explained that
Quoted from CSIS csis.org...
Russia planning to spend 80 billion rubles ($2.65 billion) on 60 Su-family fighter jets starting 2010, and buy 26 MiG-29K Fulcrum-D carrier-based fighter jets, with the expected contract estimated at about 25 billion rubles (more than $828 million), a military aircraft plant manager told the paper. The plans also include the purchase of 32 Su-34 Flanker fighter bombers under the 2008 contract (a single plane then cost more than 1.1 billion rubles ($36.4 million), he said.
Quote From [url=http://siteground243.com/~hiram155/2011/11/23/russia-prepares-for-war-with-west-as-defense-ministry-announces-unprecedented-airforce-acquisitions /]http://siteground243.com/~hiram155/2011/11/23/russia-prepares-for-war-with-west-as-defense-ministry-announces-unprecedented-airforce-acquisitions/[/ url]
Su-35S fighter The Russian Air Force will take delivery of about 90 new or modernized fixed and rotary wing aircraft in 2012, a Defense Ministry spokesman said on Tuesday. The Air Force will receive up to 10 Su-34 Fullback fighter-bombers, about 10 Su-25SM Frogfoot attack fighters, and an unspecified number of Su-35S Flanker-E multirole fighters, Col. Vladimir Drik said. The Su-35S is Russia’s advanced “Generation 4++” fighter. New acquisitions will also include over 20 attack helicopters, such as the Mi-28N Night Hunter and the Ka-52 Alligator, as well as “highly modernized” Mi-35 Hind helicopters. The Air Force will also receive about 30 Mi-8 transport and five Mi-26T heavy lift helicopters.
Originally posted by Chance321
reply to post by essanance
Not good, not good at all. But it's not just Russia thats building up, China also and in the mean time whats obama doing cutting military spending all thanks to his staged "Super Committee" how he knew would never come to an agreement in turn gutting the military.
Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
If everyone only worried and gave a damn about their own backyard the world would be a better place.
Originally posted by muse7
I don't know why I keep reading how easy the US and NATO would take out Russia.
Russia is not Iraq or Afghanistan, they have a modernized military and air force, don't forget those submarines armed with ICBM's that could be parked off the Maryland shoreline
Russia's air force is pretty good, and could potentially deter any aerial campaign launched by the "allies"
Most wars that have been fought against the cave dwellers in Iraq and Afghanistan have been won because of the air superiority of the US.
Take away the skies and the US and NATO would need to attack Russia on the ground, and that ain't going to be pretty.edit on 11/25/2011 by muse7 because: (no reason given)