Human "Being" Very informative and interesting video

*This video is basic
in order to be understood basically*

You cannot be deceived when you know the "source" of the truth.

This video states what we are as "Human Beings". It is not by book definition that this is stated, as these things existed prior to mans attempt at defining them. This video defines our first language as we "Human Beings" or "Beings in Human form" communicate through energy prior to speech.

Wiki:

Speech:

Speech is the "vocalized" form of human communication etc.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Our first language is not "vocal" or "audible" but rather internal and external via energy. The video will explain further.

Mind F-ck! Its kinda interesting but the first humans didn't communicate through language they communicated through emotion and feeling.

I am VERY good at reading the energy or a room or a person. I can pin point trouble makers a mile away (sote of speak). And it also works the other way around. People are able to read me very clearly aswell. I am generally a very happy and out going person. And I've even been in a meeting and a co-worker all of a sudden just turns around and says to me "whats wrong?". Before hand I did not see this person all day or speak to anyone with what was bothering me. It was like they could 'feel' that there was somthing wrong with me.

Cool vid S&F

reply to post by dankety


Emotion and feeling are expressions of energy

Bumpity!

Some are ready while many are being prepared

This is not correct. The first language was body language. Than it progressed to sign language, than verbal, and than pictures + Verbal, and than Written + Verbal.

Originally posted by darkredfish
This is not correct. The first language was body language. Than it progressed to sign language, than verbal, and than pictures + Verbal, and than Written + Verbal.

What you define is the human perspective and what is defined in the videos is prior to human perspective. In other words, what you state is the observable result of "energy" at work, yet you cannot explain the source. The video explains the source that producess the result of which you mention.

How do you know what someone is feeling without them mentioning it? This is the language that is spoken of which is prior to "body language" as body language must be observed to be interpreted. You do not have to be present to observe someones emotional state using energy thus "Prior". What you speak is "what students are taught". What the video states is what "teachers are tought".

Many are not ready

bumpity bump bump!

reply to post by VideoDude

The entire first minute could be summed up in three words: ‘we have souls.’ Whether that is true or not, it certainly isn’t news and it certainly doesn’t need sixty very tedious seconds to tell. Energy is not a language. Energy can be modulated to carry information, which would have to be transmitted in some kind of language. Again, this is not news. It is what we do every time we open our mouths to speak. And it does not make energy a language any more than it makes a newspaper a language.

I’m sorry to say I ran out of patience about ninety seconds in, so I can’t comment on the rest. I have to say the music was very silly, kind of no-budget portentous, and the visuals bore absolutely no relationship to the words on the screen. They made me think of a hymn I used to sing in my school choir, one that went

Eternal Ruler of the ceaseless round
Of circling planets singing on their way...

Not exactly the effect you were hoping for, I guess, but then...

Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by VideoDude

 

The entire first minute could be summed up in three words: ‘we have souls.’ Whether that is true or not, it certainly isn’t news and it certainly doesn’t need sixty very tedious seconds to tell. Energy is not a language. Energy can be modulated to carry information, which would have to be transmitted in some kind of language. Again, this is not news. It is what we do every time we open our mouths to speak. And it does not make energy a language any more than it makes a newspaper a language.

I’m sorry to say I ran out of patience about ninety seconds in, so I can’t comment on the rest. I have to say the music was very silly, kind of no-budget portentous, and the visuals bore absolutely no relationship to the words on the screen. They made me think of a hymn I used to sing in my school choir, one that went

Eternal Ruler of the ceaseless round
Of circling planets singing on their way...

Not exactly the effect you were hoping for, I guess, but then...

Actually, I did expect that since you've made it quite clear that "your mind is firmly closed" in your description.

Awesome post, I have been using this form of knowing whats around me for years. It's hard to explain it to closed minded people but for me it's a fact of life

reply to post by VideoDude

Astyanax: Not exactly the effect you were hoping for...

VideoDude: Actually, I did expect that since you've made it quite clear that "your mind is firmly closed" in your description.

Closed it may be, but it is still capable of discriminating between hope and expectation. And, moreover, capable of detecting irony in obvious cases, such as my avatar.

Seriously, is that the best response you’re capable of? I suppose it’s too much to expect anyone impressed by that video to be a dab hand at repartee. Still, my point stands: energy is not and cannot be a language. Energy radiating or flowing away from a source can be made to carry information but it is not in itself information. Care to address that?

Bizump!