It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by BRAVO949
Was the Hebrew accent of the lead hijacker on Flight 11 also faked?
Was the testimony of his girlfriend that he spoke Hebrew also faked?
Was the Zionist terrorist attack on the King David Hotel while dressed like Arabs also faked?
Was the attack on the USS Libtery by Zionists to blame it on Arabs faked?
Were the Lavon Affair bombing in Egypt to blame it on Arabs faked?
Were the Iraqi synagogue bombings that killed and injured Jews carried out by Zionists to blame it on Arabs also faked?
The photo of the mural on the truck is fake. Truther's faking evidence to blame 911 on the Joos is real.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by buster2010
Do you have the vin number from the truck in the op's video? Because this is the only way of knowing if you have the same truck because there was more than one of those trucks made that year. DUH
The photo is fake. A Christian Nazi Truther faked it to promote his 911Joo theories. If you want to try to prove the van mural is real....Be my guest Truther. Good luck.
The 5 "dancing" Israelis were seen filming the first plane impact and celebrating it. These 5 men hopped into their white van. If you can remember 911 at all, various reports of possible truck bombs, including on one of the bridges, were reported via ALL MSM.
Those 5 Israelis were stopped by NYPD (one of the arresting officers has also provided a youtube video with his account). They were "dressed as arabs" and told the police they were not against them, they were with them, we are not your enemy, the Palestinians are your enemy.
.
So now, 'truthers' are not legitimate? Only 'researchers' are? This type of name calling will produce nothing and will only serve those who would continue to muddy the waters. It's no accident that the same group who fight to defend the OS regarding the collapse of the towers, the 'hole' in Shanksville, and the 'plane' at the pentagon are the same who find it so ridiculous that Zionists were involved in 9/11. The world is waking up and we're bound to make some mistakes when placing blame, but the fact that what we were told a pack of lies is not going away. 'Truther', by definition, suits me just fine because when it comes to the OS, there is very little of it.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well I for one don't appreciate, at all, some idiot taking a picture of a truck/van, resizing the picture up (which caused the increased pixelation), doing that painting, and slapping it on some video along with credible evidence (the police recordings, known for years), to build a case against Israel.
But we don't need no stinking mural van to build a case against Israel's involvement in 9/11. Plenty of other examples substantiate it.
To genuine 9/11 researchers (not "truthers"): Press on, friends.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well I for one don't appreciate, at all, some idiot taking a picture of a truck/van, resizing the picture up (which caused the increased pixelation), doing that painting, and slapping it on some video along with credible evidence (the police recordings, known for years), to build a case against Israel.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by donhuangenaro
lol, it's so funny, you didn't even watch the video to hear the NYPD audio recordings where a policeman describes the mural...
Let me explain how reality works...if the presenter of "startling new information" is shown to be presenting false information...as is shown by the actual truck photo and the heavily photoshopped truck photo with the plane image...then everything ELSE they say is suspect, up to and including supposed audio of a policeman describing the truck.
...and WTF would police use an audio only recording of a description of the truck? Cops use video cameras exactly like everyone else to record crime scenes. You do know it's the 21st century, right?
you are a really nice example of an ignorant
This, coming from someone who believes everything he sees on a Youtube video. How many fake Hitler rants and fifteen year old girls describing their outfits of the day did you need to wade through on Youtube before you found this "critical crime scene evidence"?
You're taking gullibility to a whole new level, guy.
Originally posted by Savage206
thanks everyone for taking a look at this video! The van on ebay certainly is news to me. IMHO it really does look like the same van....it was the police audio that had my jaw on the ground. Not sure what to think, just one more piece to the puzzle.
Originally posted by ICanThink
Another link to Mossad:
I, Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, swear to The God Almighty that I say the truth, the only truth, and nothing but
the truth and if I lie let The God punish me in ThisWorld and in the World to Come, and testify as follows:
1) I indeed used to serve as a commissioned officer in the Soviet military unit 46179, which was the codename
of the Soviet Special Control Service – an organization primarily responsible for detecting nuclear
explosions (underground or otherwise) everywhere in the world.
2) I indeed knew from the time of my former military service mentioned above about the existence of a socalled
“emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Center in the city of New York, in the
United States of America; and I knew about the existence of this so-called “emergency nuclear demolition
scheme” of theWorld Trade Center in New York City during not less than ten years prior to the eleventh
day of September, year 2001 AD.
3) I indeed used to know personally a very high-ranking and the very-well known official from the Israeli
secret service who was using a bogus Arabic identity and a diplomatic cover for setting up various bogus
Muslim terrorist networks in South East Asia and elsewhere and for organizing various false-flag terror
actions, including those directly connected to the 9/11 perpetration and to the 2002 Bali bombing, at least.
A photograph of this person appears below: (actually he refers to Mike Harari)
4) I was indeed invited by the abovementioned Israeli intelligence official to his celebratory breakfast early
morning, 12 of September, 2001, Bangkok time (still evening of 11 of September in the United States).
This celebratory breakfast took place in his diplomatic residence at: 15A, Bangkapi Mansion, 89, Soi 12,
Sukhumvit Road, Bangkok, Thailand. And I indeed discussed with this Israeli intelligence official various
proceeds of the 9/11 perpetration during this breakfast which was indeed the celebratory one.
5) I indeed honestly informed the US authorities at the US Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand, of all of the
abovementioned facts providing them in a form of a detailed testimony and I could confirm that the US
authorities definitely know about all the four abovementioned facts at least from my testimony.
6) I could confirm that the US authorities knew about terrorism-related activities of the abovementioned
high-ranking Israeli intelligence official, as well as about my and his close relationship, even without me
informing them as mentioned in the clause 5) above, and they US officials indeed attempted to prosecute
him. However, they abandoned all prosecution attempts against the abovementioned Israeli intelligence
official and let him escape the prosecution by using another bogus identity. This particular fact that the US
officials knowingly let the abovementioned person escape the justice is duly documented in several Thai
law courts and I know the corresponding criminal cases’ numbers and could provide them if necessary.
Anyone could use the text of the abovementioned testimony of mine in any legal proceedings, without
modifying any word of mine and without taking any word of mine out of the entire context of the said.
I could repeat the above testimony of mine in front of the court of law of any country.
Dimitri A. Khalezov,
the witness.
Also he claims that prior to the attacks Mike Harari asked him if Russia knows about “emergency nuclear demolition scheme”...
...Dimitri A. Khalezov motives: despite the he knew the plot from the very beginning, he did not care, it was not his war, and the event was just another prove for him ow sick is the American society is. Above all, it is dangerous too. Until Viktor Bout, his close friend, was arrested and accused of smuggling arms. So he decided to strike back and bring the story into the light.
9/11 was not actually an inside job. Maybe some of US high officials and CIA agents were involved, but for the most of them it was a surprise too. They would not buy the official flimsy story, so another second story for high officials had to be told.
To explain nuclear events on Ground Zero and the Russian Granit missile in Pentagon they brought in Viktor Bout, who allegedly sold the missile and nuclear briefcases to the "terrorists".
All the other possible motives are ridiculous, including his own. He is not crazy, he does not do it for money (who could pay him?). It is hard to donate him, his PayPal account was blocked..
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by BRAVO949
I agree with everything you say, but if you take the vitriol out of it, it may be more effective.
Originally posted by pshea38
I myself was very convinced of Khalazovs testimony until I came to learn that most of
his evidence is based on Faked video.
www.septemberclues.info
www.cluesforum.info
He also exonerates most of the main suspects including Bush, Cheney Silverstein, Guilliani etc.
I now see that he is another (deeper) layer in the whole Hoax/Deception that was 9/11.edit on 16-11-2011 by pshea38
His testimony has nothing to do with "no planes" theory.
The fact that Khalezov is a "noplaner" does not make his statement false.
Khalezov is not "Hoax/Deception" for many reasons. He is little visible, he is Russian, he is not trained to debate, he stands for "no planes" theory that may only damage his credibility and even people who accept his nuclear theory asked him not to mention it but he is stubborn.
And what kind of hoax is it if he testifies against Mossad? And the cover up that came later is on US officials anyway, he just says that it was not planned by US government.
Bush does not plan or decide, he just says what he was told to say.
"No planes" is offtopic, but since you mentioned it...
Simon Shack's "Septemberclues" has many intentional mistakes that can be easily debunked. BTW, debunked "Septemberclues" does not mean debunked "no planes". "Septemberclues" was debunked even by the others "no planers".
Simon Shack and everybody else who pushes "holograms" intentionally discredit "no planes" theory and truth movement in general.
The best "no planes" arguments I have seen are here:
acebaker.blogspot.com...
911composites.wiki-site.com... extra DIV
Originally posted by ICanThink
Originally posted by pshea38
I myself was very convinced of Khalazovs testimony until I came to learn that most of
his evidence is based on Faked video.
www.septemberclues.info
www.cluesforum.info
He also exonerates most of the main suspects including Bush, Cheney Silverstein, Guilliani etc.
I now see that he is another (deeper) layer in the whole Hoax/Deception that was 9/11.edit on 16-11-2011 by pshea38
His testimony has nothing to do with "no planes" theory.
The fact that Khalezov is a "noplaner" does not make his statement false.
Khalezov is not "Hoax/Deception" for many reasons. He is little visible, he is Russian, he is not trained to debate, he stands for "no planes" theory that may only damage his credibility and even people who accept his nuclear theory asked him not to mention it but he is stubborn.
And what kind of hoax is it if he testifies against Mossad? And the cover up that came later is on US officials anyway, he just says that it was not planned by US government.
Bush does not plan or decide, he just says what he was told to say.
"No planes" is offtopic, but since you mentioned it...
Simon Shack's "Septemberclues" has many intentional mistakes that can be easily debunked. BTW, debunked "Septemberclues" does not mean debunked "no planes". "Septemberclues" was debunked even by the others "no planers".
Simon Shack and everybody else who pushes "holograms" intentionally discredit "no planes" theory and truth movement in general.
The best "no planes" arguments I have seen are here:
acebaker.blogspot.com...
911composites.wiki-site.com...
This is not about no planes. This is about fake collapse video and footage which is
the basis for khalezovs theorising. But I can see where you are at. Use a few
buzz words like no-plane and hologram to discredit the only area of research that
can produce provable and demonstrable results. 9/11 was a preplanned demolition job
and All footage released was faked hollywood style to reinforce the narrative
selected by the perpetrators (with incorpoated anomalies to keep the conspiracy people
chasing their tails). There were very few, if any real victims that day with most
being computer generated entities with no real existence. I have read and viewed all
khalezov has presented and was very convinced by his reasoning. But if the footage was
not genuine (produced using CGI virtual reality demolition software), then his theorising collapses.
And the footage is not genuine.
www.cluesforum.info
www.letsrollforums.com
The overwhelming amount of 9/11 FAKERY is undeniable.
But each to their own truth, I suppose.
Fakery Fakery Everywhere.
And We Lap(ped) It All Up. extra DIV
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by buster2010
Do you have the vin number from the truck in the op's video? Because this is the only way of knowing if you have the same truck because there was more than one of those trucks made that year. DUH
The photo is fake. A Christian Nazi Truther faked it to promote his 911Joo theories. If you want to try to prove the van mural is real....Be my guest Truther. Good luck.
Look at you Waypastit. How good you are at spotting fakery!
I wonder can you spot any fakery here?
Well?
I agree with Septic. The whole Israeli involvement in 9/11 is made WAY too obvious.
If you believe that the perpetrators are Israel, and also believe that with their unlimited
financial and intelligence resourses they couldn't have disguised their involvement any
better, you are delusional. This is bigger than the only recently created entity called Israel.
Since 9/11 was a hoax/con/demolition job with no terrorists, no planes and few if any victims,
all such Israeli considerations were inbuilt into the narrative and designed to function as a deeper
layered distraction for investigators.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by buster2010
Do you have the vin number from the truck in the op's video? Because this is the only way of knowing if you have the same truck because there was more than one of those trucks made that year. DUH
The photo is fake. A Christian Nazi Truther faked it to promote his 911Joo theories. If you want to try to prove the van mural is real....Be my guest Truther. Good luck.
Look at you Waypastit. How good you are at spotting fakery!
I wonder can you spot any fakery here?
Well?
I agree with Septic. The whole Israeli involvement in 9/11 is made WAY too obvious.
If you believe that the perpetrators are Israel, and also believe that with their unlimited
financial and intelligence resourses they couldn't have disguised their involvement any
better, you are delusional. This is bigger than the only recently created entity called Israel.
Since 9/11 was a hoax/con/demolition job with no terrorists, no planes and few if any victims,
all such Israeli considerations were inbuilt into the narrative and designed to function as a deeper
layered distraction for investigators.
Oh joy!!! A truther using a super blurry photo to try and prove something!! Real original. Why is it that after all these years, you guys still need to use blurry photos to try and sucker the gullible into seeing things that are or are not there.
Let's try this photo:
Still see a plane!
Yup still a real plane!
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by buster2010
Do you have the vin number from the truck in the op's video? Because this is the only way of knowing if you have the same truck because there was more than one of those trucks made that year. DUH
The photo is fake. A Christian Nazi Truther faked it to promote his 911Joo theories. If you want to try to prove the van mural is real....Be my guest Truther. Good luck.
the van is for sale in Chicago on ebay