It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Under development since 1995, the military's goal is to install microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into "smart particles" the size of a single molecule.
Originally posted by verschickter
11 Flags and 3 replies, are you serious ATS?
Also, computers the size of a molecule is pure nonesense. The link seems to be a private site and so it has zero credibility. Use your brains, molecule sized computers... Learn how transistors work and then tell me again about molecule sized computers... you will laugh at yourself
Originally posted by ThirdMind
reply to post by CherubBaby
WHAT?! THIS.... THIS IS MADNESS. I was never one to believe in chemtrails, but this has opened my mind to the reality that this may in fact be legitimate.
reply to post by CherubBaby
How much nanocrap has been sprayed so far?
"Tens of tons," he replied.
Tens of tons of molecules?
"Much of it is still up there," Hank went on to explain. This is because nanoparticles are so light and small they tend bind to bind with oxygen molecules. And piggybacking on oxygen particles makes them buoyant.
Originally posted by dezertdog
reply to post by CherubBaby
How much nanocrap has been sprayed so far?
"Tens of tons," he replied.
Tens of tons of molecules?
"Much of it is still up there," Hank went on to explain. This is because nanoparticles are so light and small they tend bind to bind with oxygen molecules. And piggybacking on oxygen particles makes them buoyant.
This would explain the whitening of the sky I've been noticing for some years now.
No more deep blue skies for us.
S&F for you OP excellent find.
Originally posted by dezertdog
reply to post by firepilot
Funny how you always pop up with snide remarks.Troll on!
C-YA!
Originally posted by CherubBaby
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
You have a link to back up what you say right? I do.
Originally posted by CherubBaby
reply to post by waynos
There is plenty to back the thread up . This isnt opinion it's fact and I have countless pieces of documentation to back it up. You can read it or you can pretend you are an authority. Waynos you have given your opinion. thx.
The term "particle" is usually applied differently to three class of sizes. The term macroscopic particle, usually refers to particles much larger than atoms and molecules. These are usually abstracted as point-like particles, even though they have volumes, shapes, structures, etc. Examples of macroscopic particles would include dust, sand, pieces of debris during a car accident, or even objects as big as the stars of a galaxy.[13][14] Another type, microscopic particles usually refers to particles of sizes ranging from atoms to molecules, such as carbon dioxide, nanoparticles, and colloidal particles. The smallest of particles are the subatomic particles, which refer to particles smaller than atoms.[15] These would include particles such as the constituents of atoms – protons, neutrons, and electron – as well as other types of particles which can only be produced in particle accelerators or cosmic rays.
Originally posted by verschickter
11 Flags and 3 replies, are you serious ATS?
Also, computers the size of a molecule is pure nonesense. The link seems to be a private site and so it has zero credibility. Use your brains, molecule sized computers... Learn how transistors work and then tell me again about molecule sized computers... you will laugh at yourself
HANK CALLS The term "nano-chemtrails" on my homepage prompted my trusted military informant I've dubbed "Hank" to call.