It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by steveknows
I will accept your opinion if you can tell me why Thimerosol is used as an adjuvant in vaccines.
Originally posted by Amanda5
to steveknows
You still have not answered my question about Thimerosol.
You did not even write the word Thimerosol in your response.
Why is Thimerosol used in vaccinations?
It is a derivative of Mercury.
Mercury is the most toxic substance known to man.
As a Child I had both Mumps and Measles and I survived.
My immune system managed to fight the disease and now I probably have a higher rate of defence that anyone who has had a vaccine. Just remember the genetic predisposition of the parents will determine how strong the defence system of the Child.
Much Peace...
Originally posted by blackrain17
reply to post by steveknows
Let's not get crazy and tell people we need to get vaccinated for everything. Vaccine isn't a cure but a prevention. Even if you get vaccinated, you can still catch diseases you are trying to prevent. Like I said previously, vaccines should never be mandatory. You can't actually tell me what exactly is in every vaccines. This gives too much power to the government.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by steveknows
You are still missing the point.
I know what Thimerosol is and that is why I am against vaccines.
All you could do was be condescending and tell me I could have found out for myself.
I want YOU to convince me - I don't need to click on a site you provide as a link. I have and am still researching for myself. When you are trying to convince someone that your point of view is right - then convince me with your knowledge - not a link to a website. Your assumption is what tells me you do not read widely or deeply but rather rely on what has been indoctrinated into your thinking - this is why you think vaccines are okay when clearly they are not. Where is the empirical research on vaccines? There is none - vaccines have not been tried and tested and that is why the Government push them. The Government invests a lot of dollars into pharmaceuticals - take the money factor out and see how far the vaccine debate goes.
As a moot point and if you are inclined- visit sott.com and go to a category titled Health & Wellness.
There is a recent article titled - Documents Reveal 26 More Gardasil Deaths.
I love discourse with depth but you have not convinced me and I would love you to convince me I am wrong but right now I support the Original Poster on this one.
Much Peace...
Originally posted by jameshawkings
Originally posted by anywho
reply to post by projectvxn
How is that any different from conventional media? Just sayin...
Exactly, somehow it's ok for the BBC, CNN etc to get away with using all kinds of dirty tactics, but when someone thinks that Natural News is extending the truth it's a huge problem
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Vaccines are DEAD virus', not live. The whole point of using a dead virus is to introduce it to your immune system so it can prepare antibodies.
Think your readers will need to take some of these items with a serious grain of salt.
Originally posted by blackrain17
I know this thread isn't about vaccines but it seems as though everyone is mostly interested in this topic so let me chime in...
There are three types of anti-vaccine advocates:
1. There are people that do not understand the concept of vaccines and think that injecting diluted amounts of the actual virus is evil.
2. There are people that do not understand what causes autism and blames vaccines.
3. There are people that understand the concept of vaccines but they do not know what's actually being injected and do not like Thimerosal (preservative containing mercury) used in some of vaccines.
Please don't be that guy or that girl that chooses 1 or 2. Thank you