Is there a Special Purpose to all of this????

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread774685/pg1#pid12785218]post by ButtUglyToad

Please see the guidelines for posting a thread on ATS. No more shots at humor for you either.

Considering there are peeps in this forum that make posts saying Acceptance is the Key or living in the Now is the Key, then why can't a Sexual existence in the Now be what this is all about and what's so hard to Accept about that? The Now theorist clearly has provided that sex only happens in the Now and the Acceptence theorist clearly has provided that the girls should accept the sexual desires of the other person, so by applying both together and tag'n 'em with sex, it's a Trifecta.

I see the humor in their stupid theories, so why can't eYe have a stupid theory that's just as valid?

If you think about it, there are more peeps having sex than any one religion, so since the stupid theories on here don't have the kind of following religions have, then sex could easily be what this is all about.

Of course, if you had used logic instead of opinion to figure out what this post is actually about, then you would have seen what was hidden within this thread and the video.

Ribbit

Originally posted by unknown known
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

Special purpose? And the video? haha what the heck was that about. Id say theres no special purpose but exactly what the guy at the end gettin it on said, "hey, this is like a, a riiiide!"

Life is like a ride, you go up, you go down. Sometimes they go down on you and you go down on them.

Enjoy

Ain't it!

The interesting thing about a great roller coaster, is you gotta go up to go down and which way is more fun and why isn't it that way with life?

Ribbit

reply to post by ButtUglyToad

Of course, if you had used logic instead of opinion to figure out what this post is actually about, then you would have seen what was hidden within this thread and the video.

Is this an opinion ?

ATS has guidelines they would like you to follow, while posting a thread. You chose not to follow, or even to look at the guidelines.

No it's a fact.

If you would have even considered the ATS guidelines ? You would see why, there are guidelines. Like, not everyone can play your video. So it's important to describe the video in your OP, for those who can't view it.
Plus with the correct amount of text in your OP ? I might not have to, " figure out " this endeavor in hidden meaning and esoterica. Two paragraphs would be logical.

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

Of course, if you had used logic instead of opinion to figure out what this post is actually about, then you would have seen what was hidden within this thread and the video.

Is this an opinion ?

ATS has guidelines they would like you to follow, while posting a thread. You chose not to follow, or even to look at the guidelines.

No it's a fact.

If you would have even considered the ATS guidelines ? You would see why, there are guidelines. Like, not everyone can play your video. So it's important to describe the video in your OP, for those who can't view it.
Plus with the correct amount of text in your OP ? I might not have to, " figure out " this endeavor in hidden meaning and esoterica. Two paragraphs would be logical.

ATS rules dew kNot require me to spoon feed anything to anyone and I see peeps posting video links all the time with no mention to the content of the video, so if that is a rule, it's being violated all over the place. Also, if the scripts on ATS weren't screwed up, I would have had the actual video showing instead of just a link and you could see the video is labeled "Special Purpose" and from a movie called Jerk, with Steve Martin, but everytime I post a YouTube link it doesn't werk right so I have to post the link instead.

Ribbit

reply to post by ButtUglyToad


No one said anything about rules. In fact you can do what ever you like. Desecrate all the boards with GLP
like, flagless garble. The members are the quality and to be a quality member you need to look at the guidelines.
Not argue about looking at the guidelines.

This conversation is over. BOOM.

^ Whatever happened to good old conversation Mr. Mod. Let the mods deal with it as that is why they are here. What do you mean by special purpose? As in the reason why you're on this planet, existing in this life? Well, I find my special purpose changes over time.

Originally posted by SpreadLoveNotHate
^ Whatever happened to good old conversation Mr. Mod. Let the mods deal with it as that is why they are here. What do you mean by special purpose? As in the reason why you're on this planet, existing in this life? Well, I find my special purpose changes over time.

You could ask what dew I mean by Special Purpose or you could ask what dew I mean by All of This or you could even go all the way and ask what dew I mean by Special Purpose to All of This?

Does the last answer the first two or does the first two answer the last or are they three different answers altogether?

Ribbit

Originally posted by randyvs
This conversation is over. BOOM.

edit on 13-11-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

It was over before it started. How hypocritical to shun someone for what you believe is an "opinion" yet fill the thread with your own useless opinions.


I've always wonder about sexology and relation to spirituality. I mean, I know the Taoist hold it very highly in some of their lifestyles, as they believe the male receives female spiritual energy and the female receives male energy which they believe replenishes one-another. I have always had a mental blockage though, and that is: they say that when you touch something you are not actually physically touching something, its just atoms resisting one-another. So, that would mean even when two people are intimately close to each other, they still aren't physically touching. The only way I could believe that two people could actually help each other would be if someone how their atoms could.. I guess.. mingle together?? on a raw energetic level. Perhaps, this is what is supposed to be achieved upon penetration (*giggle*)??

Secondly, damn you Steve Martin!

Originally posted by ErroneousDylan

Originally posted by randyvs
This conversation is over. BOOM.

edit on 13-11-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

It was over before it started. How hypocritical to shun someone for what you believe is an "opinion" yet fill the thread with your own useless opinions.


I've always wonder about sexology and relation to spirituality. I mean, I know the Taoist hold it very highly in some of their lifestyles, as they believe the male receives female spiritual energy and the female receives male energy which they believe replenishes one-another. I have always had a mental blockage though, and that is: they say that when you touch something you are not actually physically touching something, its just atoms resisting one-another. So, that would mean even when two people are intimately close to each other, they still aren't physically touching. The only way I could believe that two people could actually help each other would be if someone how their atoms could.. I guess.. mingle together?? on a raw energetic level. Perhaps, this is what is supposed to be achieved upon penetration (*giggle*)??

Wasn't there a movie where the two peeps melded together somewhat? Maybe just the hands but I seem to remember something along those lines?

Ribbit