Whistleblower Terminated from Northwestern for Revealing Human Experimentation

Until you do something about the current world monetary system you will continue to decline as a civilization.

There is no way around it.

reply to post by wayouttheredude


This story makes no sense you cant get a medical device approved with out trials. And if this doctor did these operations he already must have been in trials phase.

The 'link' was all to brief, not much information to get a picture of what you speak.

reply to post by dragonridr


The point is mate, the bad doctor was performing these tests/experimental testing on patients that either were not informed of the experiments, or were unable to make an informed choice about them, a mentally disabled person for example, or the confused elderly or even children.

Without oversight and approval from regulatory bodies (as corrupt as they are, it's all we have) this self appointed experimenter is both highly illegal and highly immoral.

Regardless of whether what he is testing out is an improvement on what is available or not, is irrelevant, it may just as well be worse than what is available and even to the point where it is actually harming the unknowing uninformed patients.

He was not in an 'official testing' phase, he had no authority to decide unilaterally to volunteer these guinea pigs, yet he did anyway.

This is ridiculous. The man who perpetrated these CRIMES, and that's what they are, should be imprisoned. Not only that, the person who got fired for reporting this should file a lawsuit and attempt to gain some form of justice for being deprived of his job for doing the right thing.

Sometimes I wish we had a country more like some of those 3rd world nations, where we could just take these people out into the street and stone them, because that is really what they deserve.

i can say even further: illegal experiments on the humans have been prime way to maximize medical R&D's efficacy, and to risk-free to be sued. + don't confuse yourself with term "not approved by gov.": any R&D with status ON is well-approved, but not everyone can be run officially. that's only reason why whistleblowers would be burned out up to butts in no time

this doctor would not need to jepardise patients in the testing of his device.

what he could have done was seek approval of those who are near or hospice state with no hope left and apon approval of the patient and/or family would be willing to try an experimental procedure realizing that it may not work but knowing no other options exist.

I'm sure he would find a willing group of patients for such a procedure and if it was successful for them it would be an ultimate testing group for FDA approval.