It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Actually they lost 650,000 totaling 4.5 billion in accounts:
money.cnn.com...
Using fractional reserve banking, this means they wont be able to do 45 billion dollars worth of business lending. haha. Sucks for them.
Originally posted by RogerT
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Actually they lost 650,000 totaling 4.5 billion in accounts:
money.cnn.com...
Using fractional reserve banking, this means they wont be able to do 45 billion dollars worth of business lending. haha. Sucks for them.
So then the movement has hampered one or two shady deals. It's a good start, but it needs to get much bigger than that if the monetary system is going to notice anything.
Just in case most don't know, the derivative mess (bad debt) is valued in the tens or hundreds of trillions. A few billion isn't even going to be noticed (as can be seen by the need for QE2 after the first few hundred billion of QE1 did nothing much).
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Adamanteus
Life should be more than just the bare necessities. Granted you could save and buy everything without credit but is it really worth it? It all starts from an unjust wage system and capitalism is all about the money going up rather than down.
As for buying used stuff just consider how much spare parts cost, mechanical fees and downtime. Everything is over-priced 2-3 times more than original cost so people buy new. The system needs turnover so the people work and the rich get richer.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
That would be ok if you already had a house, car and boat to begin with.
Originally posted by RogerT
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
That would be ok if you already had a house, car and boat to begin with.
Boat???
Do you live in Venice? (Italy for some of the US folks!)
Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
the even bigger story is why so many people chose to bank with those huge banks anyways? I've always been with my small local bank. I chose, right from the start, to support all local businesses whenever any need they could meet had risen.
And I know a lot of my friends who do the exact same thing.
It's not the banks fault they are as big as they are. It's your fault for banking there in the first place.edit on 6-11-2011 by PrimePorkchop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by RogerT
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
That would be ok if you already had a house, car and boat to begin with.
Boat???
Do you live in Venice? (Italy for some of the US folks!)
Life is not just about the needs, it is also about the wants.
Where I live is irrellevant to our discussion and have no reason to reveal to you or anyone else.
But in reality.. let's not forget that these 4 mega-banks used to be lots more (somewhat) smaller banks. So as is the case with me, and I assume a good amount of other people.. we didn't open an account with Chase, or Bank of America, or whatever, but at some point in the last decade, whatever bank we did open with got bought out
Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
reply to post by bacci0909
But in reality.. let's not forget that these 4 mega-banks used to be lots more (somewhat) smaller banks. So as is the case with me, and I assume a good amount of other people.. we didn't open an account with Chase, or Bank of America, or whatever, but at some point in the last decade, whatever bank we did open with got bought out
that's passing the buck.
You chose to stay with the new bank. When our credit card bank got bought out by Chase, we paid off our balance in full then canceled our card.
If you choose to bank or have accounts with big banks, you can't blame it on anyone or anything but yourself.edit on 6-11-2011 by PrimePorkchop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NKAWTG
reply to post by duhdiggitydan
BofA alone has over 57 million accounts. Does anyone actually believe 70 thousand closures are going to make any difference?
It would be symbolic at best which won't make any difference to big banks.