It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mistermonculous
Originally posted by Aeons
I don't think that this is possibly the only variation where this is happening, but it does seem to be possibly one of the most problematic.
Yes, ma'am. Give these guys a game, and you provide a harmless outlet for their natural inclinations, and also a place to form groups based on their mutual hobby, thus lessening their sense of alienation. Innocuous enough, yes?
Maybe not so much. I would posit: give these guys a game, and you give them a means to practice behavior they are naturally inclined toward; and the opportunity to meet others with whom they have more in common than just a shared hobby. Terminology like "Clans" doesn't just *poof* appear out of a vacuum.
Not intending to shut down our Gamez, just pointing out a fairly obvious possibility.
I cannot imagine that giving the disenfranchised fewer choices is going to work so well.
Plus, I'm fascinated how online play can be translated into IRL application. How amazing is it that some people's brains are able to adapt in this way in so little time? It is like seeing the birth of the Mech Warrior in the in between phase. This mental adaptation to rewiring one's prefrontal cortex to use abstract things or to rewire your working memory is utterly astounding. Surely this sort of adaptibility is a human asset.
And such hidden spite among all your words...I shall help you all since you seem lost...
...Everybody always thinks existence revolves around them especially the ladies, and especially the ones with big egos, but sad to say. Every dog has his day. Even the female dogs.
And this? Is evolution baby.
Originally posted by mistermonculous
I cannot imagine that giving the disenfranchised fewer choices is going to work so well.
Particularly if no one is aware of the problem as it is being defined in this thread (and pretty much only this thread, I've done some poking around). The process of exploring choices must start with an inquiry into how these guys can be given a viable slot in our societies. Now, this clearly can't be done without some heavy re-structuring, but that's where I'd start.
What alternative outlets do you see being created for/by the upper percentile in this group? I guess they'd be attempting to assemble a tribe to identify with and protect. And I guess that could take any number of forms. But you seem to have some specific leads?
Odd, I am surprised to find that the next leap in our development as a species entails incoherent pseudo-mysticism and blatant misogyny. If you are the paragon of human development you claim to be, I guess we really do have a problem.
The only thing I think I'll take away from galadofwar up there is that the restrictions that caused some of this specialization aren't necessarily natural and so traits being distributed throughout the populace over time might be better for us as a whole. But then, I don't know how much of this specialization was culturally indoctrinated, and how much is some amount of natural selection where generations of women are selecting for a set of traits in a way which is not culturally directed.
Originally posted by galadofwarthethird
reply to post by mistermonculous
Interesting response.
Odd, I am surprised to find that the next leap in our development as a species entails incoherent pseudo-mysticism and blatant misogyny. If you are the paragon of human development you claim to be, I guess we really do have a problem.
How did you get that from what I wrote? Really grow up.
Everybody always thinks existence revolves around them especially the ladies, and especially the ones with big egos, but sad to say. Every dog has his day. Even the female dogs.
As for inherited "functional purupose," it would be interested to look at that on a more scientific level. Personally, it does not fit for me. I do not have the same "profession," or anything close to it, as anyone in my immediate family or even in my direct family lineage...In regards to a general statement of "its all the same down the line," I think that can mostly be explained by the Bell curve. Most people have heard of the "Bell curve" but don't truly understand it.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by mistermonculousAlso, got some anecdotal evidence of an Intersect between the gamer community and Gym Rat culture. All the dudes I know who are fully into FSP PvP are also spending a couple of hours a day at the gym.
So, I followed that up a little:
www.cybergamer.com.au...
forum.teamxbox.com...
Holy crap, 300 threads on weightlifting, holy crap.
Originally posted by CIAGypsy Perhaps the REAL question you need to ponder is the "mental filter" that allows you to readily recognize one archetype over another?
You do realize that dancing around the word "bitch" doesn't absolve you of have having said it in another form. And that classing women as a lump group as self-absorbed and egotistical is offensive and untrue, yes? You switch subjects midway through without properly delineating between two groups (Type X men and women), so other passages could be interpreted in this light, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Point two: You seem to have an advanced case of Ascension Fever. I understand, I have a touch of it myself. If you really think you've got a bead on this subject (and I sense you believe yourself to be the subject), it might be more conducive to the discussion if you spoke to your experiences as this type of dude in our type of society.
You used the word Warrior, and you said that this sort is key to our evolution; that they will drag us in blood and pain, if necessary, up the ladder. I found that interesting. If there is a disconnect between a portion of our male population and our social structure, I think that's important. I think we should try to understand it.
Because, see, I think the genes do matter; that the string of aminos you dismiss out of hand is the ladder we are climbing. I don't see where we leave off and our replacements begin. There is a continuity, and so this stuff is well worth discussing.
I'm also a fan of panspermia. I think that even if other planets are evolving their own life forms, it doesn't render what's happening on this planet irrelevant. And all the changes that will occur between now and several thousand years out don't render our existing here and now meaningless, nor does taking the long view preclude understanding our present situation. Yeah, we all get swept into the void, so what does it matter? It matters plenty to me.
And I bet it mattered so much to you, that it burnt you out; and now you're ready to swan-dive into the black. I understand that too. Either everything matters, or nothing does. Those are equally frightening propositions, and they may also be equally valid.
But, like I said, I could have been off in my interpretation, so feel free to set me straight.
However, there is some scant research out there about how some people's brains are changing using these technologies, and the study I mentioned at the top does indeed exist.
To what end? Well, the end is that I suspect that these men aren't some useless deadend. That their abilities are something useful that has become unattached in modern society. Using these people to bag groceries is ridiculous.
I suspect that there is enough of this type in the populace with a subset of these traits found in men not so disenfranchised, that if they all decide to get together that they can wreck havoc. Useful but potentially problematic.
The disaffection and then elimination of the tribal defender.
It also likely has unintended consequences to future human endevours. The concept of "Us" as a civilized bureaucratic whole is repugnant in many ways. One asteroid strike, and the grand dream of a civilized mass becomes a stupid mess of overly differentiated predator bait.