nothing Ex nihilo nihil fit-- Latin-- nothing comes from nothing 0 never can equal 1 no matter what you do to it
1≠0 [ 0 = 1 false, 0 = 0 true, 1 = 1 true] 1=( . ) I can see the point( . ) is a singularity a 1 but every 1 has and anti or -1 meaning [ ( p ) = (
. ) = 1 is true ] but incomplete because it neglects the points inverse ( - . ) which is reverse (p) making it (-p) or (q)=(‘)
[ ( p) ≠ ( ; ) = -1= ( - . ) = ( ; ) = ( q ) ≠ ( . )=( p )= 1 ] if that makes sense then we can continue
Basically everything came from one singularity or a point so the point ( . ) is represented by ( p ) but every point has its inverse ( -. )=( ; ) and
( . ) =( - ; ) both are the opposing negative to the other so (q)will be ( q ) =( ; ) = -1 opposite to ( p )
( q ) ≠( p )
the ( q ) +( p ) =0 but (q)(p)= ( pq )( qp )
Now how do you make one point everything?
The simplest way possible i would think
This whole point represented by ( ! ) >( : ) the different of the single ( . )to itself ( ; )
these together are one ( : ) and so that 1 ≥ ( : ) = ( B )
But 1.1 but ( 1.1 ) there is a paradox because One point one is three things which 1 is the one and which is the 1 tenth of 1 only the . knows and it
like any other point has inverse -1.1 or 1;1 So both will believe they are the one and not the tenth ( 1.0 ) = ( 0.1 )[true and false=false/true]
Know that 1= ( . )Or 1 = ( ; ) so 2 ways of viewing this point. Single point must be done to overcome the paradox now
So if this (.) is the true one point it to must have and inverse or ( -. )=( ; ) because for one their is its
opposite( 1-1 )
( ; )( . ) = ( : ) ≤ ( 1 ) ≥ ( 1:1 ) = [ ( 1.1 ) : ( 1 ;1 )] is complete but since all 1s think themselves the one and not a tenth ( P ) (qp) ( Q
)
( 1.1 ( : ) 1;1 ) = [ [ ( Qp ) ( Pq ) ] + [ ( Pq ) ( Qp ) ] = ( : ) = [ ( qP ) ( pQ ) ] - [ ( pQ ) ( qP ) ] ] = ( 1.1 ) 1;1 )
1x2=2 points .x2 = : Making . is : just like 1 and -1 but a point . can never be negative only opposite to another . point [because only LR sees it as
negative RL works the opposite way so ill use ; to denote the right to left direction instead of (-) the negative sign will be important later on but
detracts from resolving paradox]
but its incomplete because 1.0 does not equal 0.1 but 0.1 = 1;0 equal [ ( 1.1 )( 1;1 ) = [ 1 ( : ) 1 ]= ( 1;1 )( 1.1 ) ] = ( 1:1 ) = ( 1 ) = ( ! )
now 1.1 is really half equal to ( 1:1 ) ≥1.1
but ( 1:1 ) = ( 1;1 ) ( ± ) ( 1.1 ) is equal from one direction left to right as well as the other
Perspective of whose 1 depending on which way you read and interpreter
left to right ( > ( or right to left ) < )nether way is wrong but neither is correct then
like driving in England with the wheel on the right or driving in the U.S. with the wheel on the left 2 ways same sh*t different direction all going
to a similar destination Bar or Pub
( : ) is the two points of one point ( : ) ≥ ( . ) ( ; ) = ( 1.1 ) ( 1;1 ) = ( 1.1:1;1 ) = ( 1:1 )
Just as ( p )=0.1 and ( q )=0;1 while ( P ) =1.0 ( Q ) =1;0 as well
The decimal point has its transverse meaning 1.0 means one whole but 0.1 is but a tenth to truly be balanced like 1.1 is against -1.1 or 1;1 making (
1.1:1;1 ) =( Pp ) : ( qQ ) if it = ( 1:1 ) = ( 1 ) = ( ! ) just like ( q:p ) =( p:q )
same as ( ! ) = ( B ) = ( p:q ) = [ ( P ) p( Q ) q ] = [ ( Pp ) ( Qq ) ( Qp ) ( Pq ) ] ± [ ( pP ) ( qQ ) ( pQ ) ( qP ) ] = [ ( P.p ) ( Q.q ) : ( Q;p
) ( P;q ) ]
Know that 1= ( . )Or 1 = ( ; ) so 2 ways of viewing this point. Single point must be done to overcome the paradox now
So if this . is the true one point it to must have and inverse or ( -. ) =( ; ) because for everything their is its opposite( ; ) ( . ) = ( : ) =1 (
1:1 ) = ( qp ) ( pq ) So ( 1.1:1;1 ) is complete but since all 1s think themselves the one and not a tenth ( 1.1 ( : ) 1;1) = [ [ ( Qp ) ( Pq ) ] + [
( Pq ) ( Qp ) ] = ( : ) = [ ( qP ) ( pQ ) ] - [ ( pQ ) ( qP ) ] ] = ( 1.1 ) : ( 1;1 )
1x2=2 points .x2 = : Making . is : just like 1 and -1 but a point . can never be negative only opposite to another . point [because only LR sees it as
negative RL works the opposite way so ill use ; to denote the right to left direction instead of ( - ) the negative sign will be important later on
but detracts from resolving paradox]
but its incomplete because 1.0 does not equal 0.1 but equal 0.1=1'0 [ (1.1=1'1) (1'1=1.1) ]=1:1
now 1.1 is really half equal to 1:1 but 1;1 = 1.1 is equal from one direction left to right as well as the other
both ways the one is on 0;1 = 1.0 1;0 = 0.1
the correct start to count is 0.1 then 0.2 at 0.9 next you get 1.0 whole
the correct start to count is 0;1 then 0;2 at 0;9 next you get 1;0 whole
1.0+1;0 =1.1 or 1;1 since it can be shown in two ways ( 1.1:1;1 )
edit on 30-10-2011 by IblisLucifer because: (no reason given)