It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
reply to post by traveller4
Not everyone can stream video.
Example
Care to take the time and give a description of the video's contents?edit on 28-10-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Panic2k11
.....even if he claims to have successfully won some legal battles there will be a point of collapse of his philosophy, for instance what if his property is stolen, set on fire or destroyed by an earthquake.?
Originally posted by Panic2k11
The documentary also doesn't fully explain if his wife shares his philosophy, the implications here are more profound since it will affect his own decisions (marriage is a partnership hence he is not fully independent, actions will not affect only one person), how about children's education provided by the state, that would be a requirement or at least a certification, if not his philosophical choice will affect and bound the future of any child he has, in fact breaking his own view of self determination.
Originally posted by Panic2k11
The other issue is that it isn't at all portable, it seems to have worked in Canada and to some degree it also has some strength in the USA but I haven't seen this movement of sovereign citizens spread much further (but I haven't looked too deep).
As a mass movement it will not work because there wouldn't be enough resources for all. The documentary also fails to expand on the notion that it requires a high degree of moral integrity, since he has excluded himself from any obligations to the state he doesn't have to follow any laws, not even environmental ones...
Originally posted by Panic2k11
My view on the issue is that the it all can be reduced to a gimmick that has addressed his personal needs so far.