Beautiful chem-trail sites in my backyard

reply to post by ZombieJesus


great cloud shark.
it must be a "chem cloud shark" since it lasted more than a few seconds.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by dplum517


Your post is gone but I'm using my imagination and I like everything you had to say. Keep up the good work and let's see what we can get together to offer the many 'scientists' in these chemtrails threads. I don't think it's really more evidence they want because they just pooh pooh that every time it hits. I'm reading up on the habits of pack animals and hope soon to have some insights into their primal cravings.

I think they key point is that people would be stopped dead in their tracks if some evidence was posted that at least made people think, "ooh, that's worth considering, there may be something in that, I haven't seen that before".

Evidently that isn't happening and the only people that are swallowing it are those who don't know the subject matter already and have made their minds up that it's all true without even checking. At least that's what I'm seeing, and I'm constantly trying to see the other side.

I didn't see dplums post either, but the evidence that remains suggests that it was offensive, rather than merely off topic. Is that something you applaud? Only you seem to take umbrage quite quickly when it's the other way round.

reply to post by waynos

I didn't see dplums post either, but the evidence that remains suggests that it was offensive, rather than merely off topic. Is that something you applaud? Only you seem to take umbrage quite quickly when it's the other way round.

No. I don't applaud anything offensive. And nothing offensive was suggested to me except in your remarks. Cyber bullying is now a crime in a number of states. This is a pattern in this forum. Sometimes that behavior becomes so offensive that people feel moved to speak out against it and most don't bother to stay or voice their opinions. In fact, in many instances, it can be a crime not to report a crime. And it is always incumbent upon each of us to reprove that behavior and to applaud those who speak out against it. Personally disparaging remarks i.e. about intelligence, mental state, emotional state etc. and pointed barbs that serve no purpose (because letting off steam at least has a purpose) but are instead an oily bunch of words that it becomes difficult to wash off are every day out of place in this forum.

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Gmoneycricket

 

Sorry....your point?

A blurb cut out of a Wiki article on aviation fuel handling considerations? And, what? Do you think automobile gasoline (petrol) is as any less dangerous and less in need of special handling concerns??

My point is if contrails were safe, the EPA would not have emission levels set for polluting our sky's.
I have another point I could make, but for now I will just watch you continue to attack every thread that has the word chem in it.

reply to post by Gmoneycricket

My point is if contrails were safe, the EPA would not have emission levels set for polluting our sky's.

The EPA (an agency that only has any jurisdiction within the boundaries of the United States) also has "emission levels set" for pollution in our "sky's" (sic).

Our skies are monitored for pollution from many, many, many sources. As well as waterways, lakes, and other aspects of our environment.

So, I see no correlation in your comment above.

See I knew you were watching,
watching posts is not above your pay grade
as you use that as defense when ever ask a question
in other threads that you do not want to answer.
So anyway I just heard screw the EPA and clean sky's above our heads.
I am glad as pilot as you claim you have no respect for those of us that look up.

reply to post by luxordelphi


I was going by the banner the mods left, Luxor, it's pretty specific. You, however, seem to be saying you are offended by me stating my opinion of what I'm reading? If so, tough, thats what the forum is for, and if we continue this line I am sure the mods will be back, so how about we forget that and let the thread return to topic?

reply to post by Gmoneycricket


But would you say that contrail pollution is the same as chemtrails? Given the stuff that is written about the latter I would venture they arent the same thing at all. I made a post myself where I offered the view that concern over pollutants is a valid one that i would like o see more investigation of, but that Chemtrail theory does that standpoint more harm than good.

I would also say, though, that air pollution has many causes, so nailing it firmly on aircraft contrails and confusing the issue with chemtrailing is a bit of a false flag that lets other offenders off the hook scot free.

reply to post by waynos


You know what? You presume to know what people are thinking or might have thought and after you belittle them and they respond to your guesswork you then get upset. Why don't you try taking a mind readers course so you will have some education in the field, rather than guessing and tripping all over yourself? Maybe they have a "Mind reading 101" in here somewhere.