Lunar photo-enhancements reveal alien civilization evidence.

Originally posted by GuardianAlliance
I don't see anything special, but defiantly there are ET's on the moon!

Since that's what this thread is kind of about, please don't keep us in suspense. Feel free to post whatever evidence you think proves your assertion beyond debate.

hm,... i wonder what Glenn Steckling would have made of the original post on this thread?. I quite enjoyed listening to that talk show broadcast he appeared on. This was uploaded on u-tube in 3 parts about the alien bases on the moon. Unfortunetly it has now been removed. There was evidence of terraced crater walls typical of what we see here on earth in open cast mining, and one crater even appeared to have material poured into it but i can't find any of the images sorry.

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
reply to post by wmd_2008

 

Those are tumble marks from when impactors hit the surface and rocks. The rocks are flung across the surface then roll a ways before they come to rest.

We have stress marks from gravitational forces and tumble marks caused from impactors being discussed on this thread at this point. However aliens did not create either category of lunar surface scaring.

MY reply was to ARIANNA not ArMaP , arianna claims the tracks are MOUNDS when he enhances the picture!

reply to post by wmd_2008


Well you guys are both correct I think. Some marks are tumble marks and other marks are debris falling in a strait line after the asteroid impact.The Moon has no atmosphere so the debris falls in a strait line behind the projectiles as there is no atmospheric resistance during travel. There are also marks created from tumbling as some projectiles roll across the surface from the same events occurring. That means some marks could be concave and others could convex.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
I am not sure what you are talking about.

I'm talking about the photo from the opening post, the one we are supposedly discussing on this thread.

As you can see in that photo, it doesn't show stress cracks, just tracks made by rolling rocks.

It shows both.

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
reply to post by wmd_2008

 

Well you guys are both correct I think. Some marks are tumble marks and other marks are debris falling in a strait line after the asteroid impact.The Moon has no atmosphere so the debris falls in a strait line behind the projectiles as there is no atmospheric resistance during travel. There are also marks created from tumbling as some projectiles roll across the surface from the same events occurring. That means some marks could be concave and others could convex.

Well aware of what you have stated old enough to have watched Apollo 11 live!

Point to an example of something rolling/bouncing and leaving a convex shape?

reply to post by wmd_2008


Some are mounds as debris follows the trail of the projectile. Much less than the indention marks, but they are there nonetheless.

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
reply to post by wmd_2008

 

Some are mounds as debris follows the trail of the projectile. Much less than the indention marks, but they are there nonetheless.

Sorry what he claims are MOUNDS are the boulder trails! I would class a mound as a small hill/surface uprising what you say I would class as debris.

He is trying to say the so called mounds he sees are evidence of structures due to his over use of the software.

Also as the picture he linked to is 60cm/pixel resolution they are some tiny structures there

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
It shows both.

Could you point to one of the stress cracks in the photo from the opening post?

Thanks in advance.

Originally posted by wmd_2008

Originally posted by arianna
Sorry for creating that impression.

Maybe I should have written that to some people the feature may appear to be a mound or a crater.

You can clearly see what are craters and what are rocks YOU can see the shadows produced by both so anyone can see that what you claim are mounds ie the trails left by the rocks are depressions on the surface as the shadows are the same as the craters on the image and at the opposite side from the rocks.

YOU cant hide that fact if you dont see that we have 2 reasons

1) eyesight problem
2) delusional!

So what one is it!

I would be grateful if you would post a reference for the image and I will analyze the view.

reply to post by arianna


The image below was on the post you cut the last piece of text from what are you playing at?

So why are you asking for the image?





On the above image you can clearly see what are tracks, craters and rocks the shadows help with working out what is what!

Can't wait to see your reply!

Originally posted by wmd_2008

Originally posted by arianna
Sorry for creating that impression.

Maybe I should have written that to some people the feature may appear to be a mound or a crater.

Have a look at this image a section from the original image from the LRO

You can clearly see what are craters and what are rocks YOU can see the shadows produced by both so anyone can see that what you claim are mounds ie the trails left by the rocks are depressions on the surface as the shadows are the same as the craters on the image and at the opposite side from the rocks.

YOU cant hide that fact if you dont see that we have 2 reasons

1) eyesight problem
2) delusional!

So what one is it!

No, I do not suffer from eyesight problems or delusions.

Here is an enhanced view of your image.



Direct link: i985.photobucket.com...

This is a 3-D version of the view.



Direct link: i985.photobucket.com...

Since it is the validity of your "enhancement" of the photos on which your assertions are based that is in question, why do you insist on responding with further enhanced images?

"I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free." - Michelangelo

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
It shows both.

Could you point to one of the stress cracks in the photo from the opening post?

Thanks in advance.

Well lets use wmd_2008's photo. In it we can observe jagged lines covered by lunar dust running perpendicular to the "roll marks."

Originally posted by wmd_2008

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
reply to post by wmd_2008

 

Some are mounds as debris follows the trail of the projectile. Much less than the indention marks, but they are there nonetheless.

Originally posted by wmd_2008Sorry what he claims are MOUNDS are the boulder trails! I would class a mound as a small hill/surface uprising what you say I would class as debris.

I checked and debris is defined as any foreign material or new material introduced to a local area where such material has been recently deposited.

Originally posted by wmd_2008He is trying to say the so called mounds he sees

are evidence of structures due to his over use of the software.

He very well may be confusing concave with convex features.

Originally posted by wmd_2008Also as the picture he linked to is 60cm/pixel resolution they are some tiny structures there

Please remember different size impactors have the same general result.

I'm still reading up on this subject.
Also take a look at this picture http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Convex_and_Concave.JPG Lines can be very confusing to the observer. FYI You'll need to cut, paste and backspace between the p : connecting the link to make it work. It does not function together on this site.

edit on 18-11-2011 by LilDudeissocool because: link issue

Originally posted by LilDudeissocoolIn it we can observe jagged lines covered by lunar dust running perpendicular to the "roll marks."

We can? Where?

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
It shows both.

Could you point to one of the stress cracks in the photo from the opening post?

Thanks in advance.

Well lets use wmd_2008's photo. In it we can observe jagged lines covered by lunar dust running perpendicular to the "roll marks."

If you are zooming in to much that will be pixels? please indicate on the picture, download highlight and repost the image!

reply to post by arianna


Instead of drawing nice circles and saying nothing PLEASE state what you think you see in the images so we can compare them with the untouched image.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by LilDudeissocoolIn it we can observe jagged lines covered by lunar dust running perpendicular to the "roll marks."

We can? Where?

Fracture marks, fault lines, are all over and through the Moon. At one time when the Moon was still hot and had a liquid core there were many Moon-quakes. Then it cooled, but fractures still remained. From impactors to gravitational stressing due to its orbit around the Earth, as it is elliptical like every orbital pattern, these cracks in the Moon from its quake period have expanded into more and more fractures which is today a web network of fractures. This web of fractures are all over and through the Moon from very large/long to very tiny/short fractures. They are seen in that picture. They are seen in every picture ever taken of the Moon.

I am not going to download that pic to "paint" and draw arrows. Then upload it in my album and post it on this thread.

I don't understand how you cannot see them? Because they are not necessarily vividly seen as they are covered with a bit of Moon dust?