It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Antz2xplicit
boston.cbslocal.com...
Originally posted by Antz2xplicit
No... because i was in the military and these sort of "training exercises" are not allowed. They put all those peoples lives at risk and property damage at risk training like that...flying between building in a populated area.
**MEDIA ALERT** Military Training Exercises to Take Place In and Around Boston
| | More
For Immediate Release
July 25, 2011
Released By:
Mayor’s Office For More Information Contact:
Mayor’s Press Office
[email protected]
Joint federal military training exercises will take place within and around the Boston area between July 26th and August 5th. Military personnel will conduct training exercises to ensure the military’s ability to operate in urban environments, prepare forces for upcoming overseas deployments, and meet mandatory training certification requirements. Helicopters will be used in some exercises.
The Boston Police Department is working with military personnel to coordinate training sites that will minimize negative impacts on our Boston citizens and their daily routines. Safety precautions have been taken to prevent risk to the general public and the military personnel involved. With that, training site locations are not open to the public and will be guarded by uniformed personnel to provide additional safety.
Originally posted by Toolatetotalk
Hardcore West Point officers don't exist in the same mentality as they did when I served in the early 90's. Most enlisted and non-enlisted combat arms are all veterans and I believe would stand-up against any obvious orders that would harm unarmed civilians. This isn't Syria.
Originally posted by StealthyKat
Interesting.....but I know some parts of the country have been holding emergency response drills, and they are supposedly very large scale and realistis....so much so, they warned people so they wouldn't freak out.
Originally posted by allenidaho
Originally posted by Antz2xplicit
reply to post by allenidaho
No... because i was in the military and these sort of "training exercises" are not allowed. They put all those peoples lives at risk and property damage at risk training like that...flying between building in a populated area.
When i was in we used to do a thing called a "fod" walk down. which is when you take a group of about 12 people and walk across a landing area and pick up small objects like sticks ect ect so it doesn't damage the chopper. there would have to be a reason to risk such an event like that.
(click the video) I am laying on top of the guy they are winching up. i know my helicopters, we trained with them all the time.
Helicopter videoedit on 26-10-2011 by Antz2xplicit because: (no reason given)
No no. You were in the Coast Guard. I was in the Navy. The real military.
We did fod walkdowns on flight decks and landing pads but nothing else. You don't get that luxury out in the field.
We also did training operations over populated cities on a regular basis. Granted, those cities were in Japan, Korea and Iraq. But still. Populated areas. Potential for damage.
Originally posted by Toolatetotalk
Despite conspiracy theories that this could be a first step toward martial law in the U.S., there won't be tanks on Main Street or active-duty troops putting down demonstrations. That is barred by federal law banning the military from being used on U.S. soil for domestic law enforcement.
Yes, there are laws against military policing on US streets -- they are part of both the 1807 Insurrection Act and 1879's Posse Comitatus Act -- but the Defense Authorization Act of 2007 gutted them.
Although US Troops had been deployed to support Katrina most of them where unarmed or had not been permitted to carry live Ammo. As Gangs and Thugs raided hospitals and such it was the security companies like XE and Red Key who had been hired to do what I personally think we should of let our combat arms deal with.
Personally I could careless if Uncle Sam or the CIA flew over my house everyday. We don't know what they're doing and frankly I don't think we want to truly review everything they do before they do it. If the # hit the fan it would be the military that would be supporting the citizens and not the individual government agencies like the FBI.
Hardcore West Point officers don't exist in the same mentality as they did when I served in the early 90's. Most enlisted and non-enlisted combat arms are all veterans and I believe would stand-up against any obvious orders that would harm unarmed civilians. This isn't Syria.
Also don't forget the US has the largest non-standing army in the world. Bigger than China and Russia. It's not the Marines or the US Army but the 75 million US Citizens who follow the 2nd Amendment. (that's and old estimate). In addition we just spent 10 years creating experienced combat veterans who mostly are now your neighbors. All of which would make any aggressive act by anyone a very sticky situation to deal with.
Support
According to a company press release, Blackwater provided airlift, security, logistics, and transportation services, as well as humanitarian support. It was reported that the company also acted as law enforcement in the disaster-stricken areas, for example securing neighborhoods and confronting criminals. Blackwater moved about 200 personnel into the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, most of whom (164 employees) were working under a contract with the Department of Homeland Security to protect government facilities, but the company held contracts with private clients as well. Overall, Blackwater had a "visible, and financially lucrative, presence in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as the use of the company contractors cost U.S. taxpayers $240,000 a day."