posted on Oct, 25 2011 @ 03:44 AM
Welfare is not always compassionate
Most people suppose that welfare is compassionate but it is not always so. Welfare prevents disabled immigrants who are willing to work from entering
a country.
The country I am in does not have any infrastructure for the disabled so I cannot work or live independently. I want to be able to do so. I am very
good with mathematics and computers. But I cannot go on my own to an office or building and work on my own, because there are no ramps, etc. I've been
programming since I was 12, and I've some skills with programming. Yet in the country I am in I am stuck in the house all day and have a very low
quality of life.
I want to immigrate to a country where I can live independently. I cannot always rely on my parents—they will die someday. I have no plans to take
any welfare money or funds for medicine or the disabled. There is no cure for my condition anyway. I rarely go to the doctor. And I want to work, not
live off of dole. I like to be independent and I believe very strongly in work being something everyone should do.
Yet I am not allowed to move because countries I will be able to immigrate to have a welfare system. Unless you are of good health, you cannot be
granted residency. I speak good english, have skills that might contribute to the economy, and yet I am excluded because the laws assume I want to be
on dole and do nothing. I find it ironic that welfare, touted as compassionate and good, can be used to exclude people. For you see, if there wasn't
welfare, people wouldn't have to worry about immigrants coming to live off of dole, and people who can contribute to society would not be excluded.
Something to think about.
edit on 25-10-2011 by 547000 because: Make the title more accurate