Though I believe Ron Paul is the most sincerest, genuine and incorruptible candidate who believes very strongly in his principles and follows them to
a fault, I cannot see him winning the Republican nomination which is a complete shame. Guaranteed the Republican National Convention will be rigged by
voters that favor another candidate, like Mitt Romney and his eVerify (666) or Herman Cain and his 9-9-9 (666). That's what I think - my opinion.
Republican leaders don't like Ron Paul. He's not part of the inner circle of elitist rich Republicans that will ensure the maintenance of their
monetary and political power. In fact he is against groups controlling the free market, skewing the free market in their favor. This whole party
system has been reduced to just a large business ensuring maximum profit for their ruling masters by masquerading as representatives of the people
when in fact they are representatives of big money. They can't balance both, serving the interested of the people, the majority, while serving the
interests of big money, the minority. Following the Law of Self-Interest, they will side with those that ensure them the best life. The poor people
majority will not do that, but the rich will which means we're screwed. This is why Ron Paul will not be nominated especially by the Republicans. He
might have a chance if he was Democratic except he wants to take down the Fed which is a big NO-NO! I say he should run independent, but then he would
lose a lot of Republican votes because people think only within party lines.
In the corrupt political and economic system that exists today, people like Ron Paul, the incorruptible, the rare and few, are not electable even
though the majority of people would vote for them.
If we the people really want change, we should change the electoral system to the popular vote, put it online and get rid of politicians (the
middlemen):
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The scientific truth is that the Law of Self-Interest (an off-shoot of survival of the fittest) is very real. It is also very true that the
corruptible element in any governance comes from the people involved in the governance. People are the problem. The popular vote would ensure, through
online voting focused regionally and nationally, that society as a whole would truly be heard reducing corruption considerably.
A little history: Political representatives existed ONLY because of communication difficulties between regions and capitals. The entire population of
a region couldn't travel to the capital to argue their point, so they appointed, by vote, a representative. That's were corruption first became
possible. It is NOW the 21st century and we have the Internet! We have no more communication problems. We all can promote and lobby online (ads) to
sway public opinion in favor or against something and we now also have the ability to vote on it online! There is no more need for politicians - just
an administrative government body to literally do our bidding from the online voting system. The public at large can vote on hiring government
administrators, budgets, defense and military actions, social and economic issues, plus so much more, quickly because online voting is very fast.
Votes would have deadlines dependent on the size of the voting region (municipal, regional, state and national), and if you don't vote on time than
you missed your opportunity, but those that did, their vote results count for the decision being voted on. For more immediate actions in times of
crisis, the top government administrator, which the public voted for (pseudo-non-political-president), can have executive power to defend the country
and top prime directive to ensure the Internet is always up so the people can vote.
Ron Paul is a good man. He is very rare in this world. A breed of his own. He is smart, honest, genuine and courageous with the political ability to
take on anyone. He is what the people need. An incorruptible! But he will one day die, which means as a people we should ensure that corruption be
eliminated completely by removing the individual human element from government.
edit on 23-10-2011 by CantSay because: (no reason
given)