It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
yeah .. you sound like a logical person .... ive seen the official reports time and time again , ive heard OSers blurting on about air preassure and melting plastic , but this oxygen tank thing is just pointless dude ... why would it explode ? and how would it assist in getting the plane through the tower and out the other side .
What is logical about ... it collapsed ... move along nothing to see here , were just taking all of the evidence as fast as we can ??
There was a minor brief fire because of a spark created by the bullet hitting the metal. The oxygen enhanced the brief fire. But like I said....there are 3 things required to support combustion, and one of them is a fuel source. Another is oxygen and the last is a heat source. Only 2 were ever present for more than a split second. Oxygen IS NOT a fuel source!!!
Oxygen behaves differently to air, compressed air, nitrogen and other inert gases. It
is very reactive. Pure oxygen, at high pressure, such as from a cylinder, can react
violently with common materials such as oil and grease. Other materials may catch
fire spontaneously. Nearly all materials including textiles, rubber and even metals
will burn vigorously in oxygen.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Even when you are presented with a logical explanation for the nose flash and all the evidence to back it up. You still can't accept it.
Originally posted by InformationAccount
Originally posted by waypastvne
Even when you are presented with a logical explanation for the nose flash and all the evidence to back it up. You still can't accept it.
So you don't think the flash could be anything other than the oxygen cyclinder.
What was the conclusion of the 9/11 commission about what the flashes were?
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
yeah .. you sound like a logical person .... ive seen the official reports time and time again , ive heard OSers blurting on about air preassure and melting plastic , but this oxygen tank thing is just pointless dude ... why would it explode ? and how would it assist in getting the plane through the tower and out the other side .
What is logical about ... it collapsed ... move along nothing to see here , were just taking all of the evidence as fast as we can ??
When you say explosives, You are telling me the towers were brought down by fast moving air. You do understand that... Right ?
If explosives are not fast moving air then explain to me what the are and how they work. You can even explain linear shape charges if you want. Come on truther Dazzle me.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by InformationAccount
Originally posted by waypastvne
Even when you are presented with a logical explanation for the nose flash and all the evidence to back it up. You still can't accept it.
So you don't think the flash could be anything other than the oxygen cyclinder.
What was the conclusion of the 9/11 commission about what the flashes were?
Never mentioned them not even once. Were they supposed to ?
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by InformationAccount
The 911 Commision was tasked to investgate the intelligence failures which alllowed the terrorists to obtain visas
without proper controls
How they were able to travel around the country and take flight lessons without atrracting attention of the
police/FBI .
They were not tasked with explaining every occurance that happened that day or how the buildings collapsed
That was the responsibility of FEMA and NIST - along with private entities like Purdue University which created
a simulation of the aircraft impacts.
Originally posted by InformationAccount
Originally posted by waypastvne
Sorry Truthers, the flash happens after impact
I don't want to get too far off track here, but what is the opposite of the Truth?
So if someone is not a truther, they are a _________edit on 22-10-2011 by InformationAccount because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by InformationAccount
Well that's kind of odd don't you think?
Perhaps they just didn't notice it.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by InformationAccount
Well that's kind of odd don't you think?
Perhaps they just didn't notice it.
No it's not odd, thats not their job. That would be the job of the NTSB. They did a full report on each crash and turned it over to the FBI. If you want to see those reports you should contact the FBI.
The NTSB did release a cause of accident: CFIT.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
I always believed the flash was caused by the air being compressed in front of the plane like we would see in a plane hitting the speed of sound (sonic boom).
As always, you were wrong.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
You are probably the lamest troll here. Prove I am wrong.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
"Flashes" can also been seen in the wings of 175. with good quality video you can see it was compressed air turning white in bursts.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
"Flashes" can also been seen in the wings of 175. with good quality video you can see it was compressed air turning white in bursts.
Ya got any links where these wing "flashes" can also been seen.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
At 30 seconds you can see compressed air lighting up above the right wing near fuselage.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
At 30 seconds you can see compressed air lighting up above the right wing near fuselage.
That is a wing cloud silly, Wing clouds do not emit light.
Would you like me to explain wing clouds to you ?edit on 22-10-2011 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)