posted on Oct, 22 2011 @ 03:49 AM
I got about five minutes in and im kind of annoyed by his premise "industrial civilization can never be sustainable." Technology changes. Pretty
much everything we have today in industrialized societies are way more efficient and less corrosive to the environment than the ones we had say 50
years ago. So obviously in order for industrialized society to continue to exist it has to keep changing in order to become more efficient in order
for people to make more money and more goods. After he made that comment I did a quick google search on some of his more famous quotes and he seems to
be romanticizing the lifestyles of the indigenous peoples. They do live off the land and use some of the modern medicine we use was based off of their
herbal remedies....their way of life is still kind of primitive when compared with industrialized societies.
I mean if it werent for industrialized societies we would have way less understanding of the way in which the world works. We would have not had the
same innovation in medicine for one. I feel as if science and technology kind of go hand in hand in the advancement of the human race. And yes we have
done terrible things to the world. But we also realize we are doing it and people are attempting to mitigate the damage it is doing to the
environment. For example, green technology is now taken more seriously than it was even 10 years ago. And it does not take a sociologist to see our
societies are not great places. But it takes time, innovation, change, etc. I feel like this guy is making a case that the grass is greener....when
its clearly not. However, I do believe there are things we can learn from indigenous people.