Mensa Machines? Geniuses Make Better Terrorist Detectors

www.foxnews.com...
I think this technology has been around for quite some time, but it seems to be advancing quite rapidly. I think this is just one more way of controlling people and keeping tabs on them. I know its pretty much a given that there are cameras just about every where we go nowadays all in the name of "security". I agree that there needs to be some way to "keep us safe", but at what price?

Most surveillance systems have functional IQs below 100, merely the median for average human IQ. Only two or three companies can operate in the space above 110, the company claims. iOmniscient has genius-level products, however, Einsteins of the surveillance world.

I don't know about you, but this sends off all kind of red flags for me. It seems as TPTB are just about ready to implement the final plans in their ultimate goal. Even if you don't believe in conspiracy theories or the TPTB are out to get you, this is still something to be majorly concerned about.

In addition to identifying suspicious running and loitering, the IQ 115 Advanced Behavioral Analysis system can warn if security personnel have encountered a problem -- that's right, it's watching the watchmen and monitoring their safety. Say a superbug hits, a horribly contagious virus of some sort. In a pandemic situation, it's important to identify potential carriers quickly and precisely. The Fevercheck system uses a thermal camera to find sick people. When it does, a normal camera is triggered to record the subject and pick him out of future crowds, something iOmniscent calls IQ Face.

So if it can identify someone who is sick, I can just imagine how it can identify someone who does or does not have a particular "mark"..(yes Im talking about the mark of the beast). Thats just an opinion, mind you, but its not really that far fetched. Also, Im trying not to think about this whole "superbug" comment. I wonder what is is store for that one? My mind is reeling right now about all the implications from this. It seems like technology is improving at a rapid pace. If this is something that that they have told us about, I can only imagine the the things that that are not be reported on.

The common (and simple) intrusion detection, a sort of video analytic tripwire, would be at the moron end of the IQ spectrum. iOmniscient's IQ Infinity takes it a step further with advanced behavioral analysis, crowd management and the ability to detect invisible objects, things left behind, and removed objects. It can do this with a few cameras or with thousands.

Also, I keep thinking about the terminator movies for some reason. Hmm. Go figure. Anyway, Id like to hear others input on this development.

Link should be fixed now

That does sound pretty diabolical. Link didn't work for me though. That always makes my tinfoil crackle a little.

Actually I would have to say this:

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that this system will be used to terrorize the citizenry.

There it has been said.
Not like it hasn't been said before.

Wow, now we have a way to guage a machines IQ? It sounds more like a way to have people go, 'wow, new smart technology, thats really neat'

I think its just more 'smart' crap that these manufacturers can sell to private corporations, local and federal governments, using software as a selling point.

Just more reasons for our 'smart' gooberment to buy crap they dont need, and cant afford.

reply to post by muzzleflash


I agree with you, however there will be some that continue to say its for our own good and well being, unfortunately.I just don't know how anyone could NOT see it for what it is though.

Originally posted by Veritas1
reply to post by muzzleflash

 

I agree with you, however there will be some that continue to say its for our own good and well being, unfortunately.I just don't know how anyone could NOT see it for what it is though.

This should be a great example of how totally uninformed and well, frankly retarded, some people actually are.

I went to the Dentist 2 weeks ago, and they refused to help me unless I first took a panoramic X-ray (which is a very dangerous machine). If you research this machine you will discover that it actually exposes your thyroid and neck area to over 500 microSieverts in under 5 seconds. That's over a full month of radiation standing on top of Mt Everest non-stop. All in under 5 seconds in my thyroids? Good lord!

Sure, Now I know why they were "looking for cancer", because they are CREATING IT!!!
"We're lookin for cancer" durrrr.

I then said "hell no, Im not taking radiation to my neck and eyes!!!" And this is what the lady said to me.

"X-rays are not radiation, they are DIGITAL!!!"

I was like "WHAT???"

And then she proceeded to bully me saying "I went to dental school I know way more than you do about this", and I asked "Did you train in radio-physiology?"

These people are so uneducated about what they are actually doing it's not even funny.
Hell no I'm not taking that much radiation in 5 seconds unless I am about to die!

They didn't even have the dentist check me out first, like the ADA guidelines suggest they are suppose to do. The American Dental Association actually specifies that X-rays should be done sparingly especially these more powerful machines (Orthopantomogram).

The rep from the ADA stated that dentists try to force x-rays onto everyone because they cost 150-350 $ a pop. It's all about money.

And guess how much money these cattle will create when they finally get gum or jaw or thyroid cancers?

It's a complete proven fact this technology increases your risks for cancer development significantly, increasing more with higher exposure values. It's a fact, cold and hard.

But here I have this lady wanting to stick me into a dangerous machine for NO REASON other than 350 $, and to top it off she thinks there is no radiation at all, it's "Digital".

I did the research, I dug long for the facts. I am actually scientifically correct about this issue.

"We're looking for cancer" - well I know why you keep finding it!!!!

reply to post by Veritas1


And one more thing. They are putting little kids in this Orthopantomogram machine every day all day long. Every kid possible, get em x-rayed!

NO don't!! Unless they are about to die, it's not worth the risks of cancer in the face/neck. It's just a few teeth that will fall out in a few years anyways, we don't actually need x-rays for all of this junk.

Kids all around me, being irradiated. And with a very powerful machine at that.

Ok, the 500 uSv figure I gave you is for the neck , and it exposes the eyes to at least 180 or so uSv.

I cannot find any reliable figures for what radiation level it exposes your gums/teeth to however, it seems to be well hidden.

Let me be honest with you, if it is exposing your neck to 500 and your eyes to 180, when it isn't even aimed at those locations (it's aimed at the teeth/gums), what do you think is hitting you in the direct beam??

It has to be like 2 or 3 full millisieverts (mSv), that's thousands of uSv. All in under 5 seconds.
Background radiation at Mt Everest is 500 uSv per month, 2-3 mSv would be four to six times as much. We are talking half a year worth of exposure in 5seconds.
That is NOT safe no matter how you cut it down, this is a 'last resort' technology, not a 'first resort for profit'.

I am going to make a big thread about it one day soon because I have gotta speak up and try to end this practice, it's being done primarily to children for crying out loud, they are most vulnerable to radiation hazards at this stage of growth.

I've got all the research to prove all of this too, it's gonna be great.

reply to post by muzzleflash


wow, I had no idea it had gotten that far. I look forward to reading your thread about this particular subject, because I think the word needs to get out about it. Thats a heck of a lot of radiation exposure for a kid!