I think the US knew all along EXACTLY what they were doing in Lybia-

So I have a theory of why this campaighn took so long and involved so much destruction. Now that a scapegoat has been killed and made an example of, what happens to the 30,000 plus injured people suffering over there? Why did we injure so many in the first place? We kill alqueida guys all the time in pakistan with pinpoint precision, and no damage to the rest of the country! Its because Lybia is one of the most oil rich places on earth, however, we dont want the oil. We want to be the saviors and come and heal the wounded like angels sent from above. Then we will be handsomely paid back to our liking im sure. Now granted there were other motives for the operation, but why so long, with so many injuries? Were all the drones busy elsewhere? Anyhow, please dont cucify me, just a theory I had, thank you.

We kill alqueida guys all the time in pakistan with pinpoint precision, and no damage to the rest of the country!

I don't think this statement is true.
Your main point is still probably correct though.

or maybe it took so long because the U.S. didn't lead the command?
Nah, it would've taken 10 years if the U.S. lead it, hehe.

Originally posted by Ghost375

We kill alqueida guys all the time in pakistan with pinpoint precision, and no damage to the rest of the country!

I don't think this statement is true.
Your main point is still probably correct though.

or maybe it took so long because the U.S. didn't lead the command?
Nah, it would've taken 10 years if the U.S. lead it, hehe.

Can you give an example of where a large or even medium area of pakistan has been destroyed? And funny hillary came out what 2 days ago and said we need to capture ghadafi dead or alive. Well, 2 days later nato clears a path and chases him into a sewage pipe where his own people are forced to be the bad guys and kill him instead of the us........not that they werent overjoyed but I think you know what Im saying.

reply to post by AllUrChips


I don't think we should have been in Lybia in the first place....all the money we are spending over there and in other countries...when we (the U.S.) need the money so badly for ourselves.

War is big business and big bucks ...for many of TPTB.....as long as they can fill their Swiss bank accounts with more money......

It just makes me so angry!

Originally posted by caladonea
reply to post by AllUrChips

 

I don't think we should have been in Lybia in the first place....all the money we are spending over there and in other countries...when we (the U.S.) need the money so badly for ourselves.

War is big business and big bucks ...for many of TPTB.....as long as they can fill their Swiss bank accounts with more money......

It just makes me so angry!

edit on 20-10-2011 by caladonea because: correction

Agreed! We should not be occupying ANY country. No matter the reason. Some cultures live differntly and if we could just learn to accept that and leave them alone, they will do what they have to do.

maybe now yous can head south (down to somalia, sudan) and chase some real criminals or something... you know the ones kidnapping and murdering innocent civilians

reply to post by AllUrChips


Thank you for the moral support.....I truly believe we do not need to be in other countries...telling them what to do....let them run their own countries and decide for themselves.

If we pulled out from the majority of the countries and closed down many military bases.....and brought our troops home.....a lot of our budget problems would be solved. My personal opinions ......doesn't Ron Paul think this way too?

reply to post by AllUrChips


Well, the U.S. became much more careful after Pakistan got angry over civilian deaths.
I get what you're saying though. There were many more civilian deaths in Libya. Probably, because we didn't have to worry about making their government mad. We were already attacking their government directly.

I was just trying to point out that we have killed civilians in Pakistan.

Originally posted by Redevilfan09
maybe now yous can head south (down to somalia, sudan) and chase some real criminals or something... you know the ones kidnapping and murdering innocent civilians

Well, we already have boys in uganda. Will that do?

The motives behind this seem to be that we are now employed by the Mafia. Need a leader killed? The US will do it. And cull the population a litte or a lot while we're at it. Somebody needs some leaders removed that don't play well with the new order of things. Looks the the world stage is being set for the grand finale.

Originally posted by Redevilfan09
maybe now yous can head south (down to somalia, sudan) and chase some real criminals or something... you know the ones kidnapping and murdering innocent civilians

THIS!

reply to post by AllUrChips


Its called sell by date weapons, what better way to get rid of all those old bombs, and DU, Libya's become a weapons dump for the Europeans, and the winners are the arms dealers and oligarchs, and the bankers who get to write off there massive debts they owed to gaddafi, and steal his gold and stocks.

In the circle of the 1% everyone a winner.