posted on Oct, 21 2011 @ 07:18 PM
reply to post by Krusty the Klown
Well that's moving the goal posts isn't it.
In 50 years why would it take 40 years to establish a Moon base? One would think technology advancement (yet to be demonstrated in the last 50 years
of space exploration) as you suggest, could do it in a couple years by then. If landing on the moon first establishes ownership, then it belongs to
the USA by that logic. But if you suggest that defense of stake could be established, the moon is a big place, a ground area bigger than the continent
of Africa, and Russia and the US has never infiltrated each other's countries here on earth, where logistics are easier.
I myself don't believe there is anything of usable value on the moon for use back here on earth. Establishing a base camp there would be for pure
unprofitable space exploration, science of the origins of our solar system, or a possible deep space launching port that also would have zero
financial benefits in anyone's lifetime involved in the project(s). There is no OZ on the moon, no Fort Knox, no hidden money tree. We already have a
good idea what is there, not a distant restaurant, with no food and no atmosphere, where the entertainment sucks–the stars only come out at night,
which is every other two weeks so check closely with your travel agent before visiting, and get one of those cell phone russian/english translator
aps, so they don't serve you a dry shoe instead of moon regolith steak. Never order it well done BTW.