It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subcsailor
Interesting Rant. I wonder what he sees as a fix. Money out of politics? Does he imply take money away from the federal government? How far does this argument go?
Originally posted by alltogethernow
That was telling it like it is. I you look at the ladies sitting there listening to him, you could tell they were thinking "I`m not going to interupt this guy".
Originally posted by amongus
reply to post by jude11
Yep...thread every day for a month and a half about this rant.
But, to me its worth posting, and re posting, and re posting to everyones content.
S n f
Originally posted by subcsailor
Interesting Rant. I wonder what he sees as a fix. Money out of politics? Does he imply take money away from the federal government? How far does this argument go?
Originally posted by jude11
What is really interesting is that it is on the MSM.
Originally posted by litterbaux
Originally posted by jude11
What is really interesting is that it is on the MSM.
Maybe the MSM decided to side with the people that pay their wages?
I mean come on, reputation and honor over wealth right?
At some point these guys have to say to themselves, "I better watch my back from screwing everyone over".
That day is today, the government's and the banks are gonna get stabbed in the back by media cuz the media run the propaganda show! They are NOT going to get undercut, they will side with the people when its profitable for them. That time is now.
Watch.
"His crimes and the scope of his crimes reflect a virus in our business culture that needs to be eradicated," Holwell said.
Holwell also ordered the Galleon Group founder to pay a $10m fine for his crimes.
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
Originally posted by subcsailor
Interesting Rant. I wonder what he sees as a fix. Money out of politics? Does he imply take money away from the federal government? How far does this argument go?
Well his stance is getting the money out of political system. What he is proposing and what he is doing on his website is trying to get a constitutional amendment to remove private money out of public elections. It is his belief that if we take that away we would receive a government that is interested in governing again.
Also it should be noted he was one of the few talkingheads that acknowledged OWS when it was just a handful of students in the park.edit on 16-10-2011 by KeliOnyx because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by colbyforce
reply to post by jude11
Damn straight. Can this guy run for pres?