It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Those weird faster-than-light neutrinos that CERN thought they saw last month may have just gotten slowed down to a speed that'll keep them from completely destroying physics as we know it. In an ironic twist, the very theory that these neutrinos would have disproved may explain exactly what happened.
Back in September, physicists ran an experiment where they sent bunches of neutrinos from Switzerland to Italy and measured how long the particles took to make the trip. Over 15,000 experiments, the neutrinos consistently arrived about 60 nanoseconds early, which means 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. Einstein's special theory of relativity says this should be impossible: nothing can travel faster than light.
Researchers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands went and crunched the numbers on how much relativity should have effected the experiment, and found that the correct compensation should be about 32 additional nanoseconds on each end, which neatly takes care of the 60 nanosecond speed boost that the neutrinos originally seemed to have. This all has to be peer-reviewed and confirmed, of course, but at least for now, it seems like the theory of relativity is not only safe, but confirmed once again.
Originally posted by Larryman
No matter if light is the fastest speed in the universe. That does not mean it is the fastest speed in the multi-verse!
They haven't admitted that yet, and until they do, I'm not sure we can say case closed on this.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
They seriously forgot to account for relatively? I find it hard to believe these people built something as complex as the LHC.
Yeah, that would be kind of ironic, wouldn't it?
So the total correction is 64 nanoseconds, almost exactly what the OPERA team observes.
That's impressive but it's not to say the problem is done and dusted. Peer review is an essential part of the scientific process and this argument must hold its own under scrutiny from the community at large and the OPERA team in particular.
If it stands up, this episode will be laden with irony. Far from breaking Einstein's theory of relatively, the faster-than-light measurement will turn out to be another confirmation of it.
Originally posted by sinthia
This theory is basically saying that the rotation of the earth relative to the GPS satellite is the cause of the nanosecond difference.
Using the same fuzzy logic, adjustments to plane flights for the rotation of the earth would be just as neccesary. Try asking a pilot if he makes adjustments for the rotation of the earth.
Yeah, that would be kind of ironic, wouldn't it?
Yeppers!
Besides, planes (as just one example) do experience a different form of relativistic time dilation
No it's not. Scientists have known that satellites experience the effects of relativity for a very long time now. I learnt about it in general physics classes. You would think that scientists shooting exotic particles across countries would have known it.
this is one of the most obscure effects of relativity that we could possibly come across.