It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Except you know, Homosexuals and protesters are executed in Iran. Other than that, yeah, sure, they sorta are like the West.
Oh and except the other fact that it's a country controlled by an organized religious institution. Did I mention that at one time it sought out to destroy Salman Rushdie?
But other than that, I couldn't give a damn what happens to Iran, as long we stay out of it.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by TechniXcality
How am I annoying. I didn't say you called them ignorant bastards, i was addressing the fact that you said you thought they were uninformed, biased persians. I disagreed and said what I thought.
Also I didn't say America wouldn't win against Iran. I said Israel wouldn't without the U.S. and/or nukes.
Originally posted by Surfrat
It’s my hope that Obama WILL strike Iran, the problem is, the strike will:
(a.) . . . be made by Obama as purely a political gamble for the November elections, in which the Dem’s get a boost while our strike force is in the air, and Obama goes on t.v. to make the annoucement;
(b.) . . . probably not be ‘ordance rich’ to fully destroy/delay the nuclear site(s) on the first strike.
(c.) . . . induce buyers remorse in which Obama will then backtrack/apologize/blame the military for “useless civilian casualties” after the strike has ended, the UN condemns “U.S. aggression” and finds a baby-milk factory that we somehow obliterated. Along with the U.S., the usual liberal ash-and-trash at the U.N. will then condemn the “Zionists”. Obama will then blame George Bush, “who started it all.”
Originally posted by Surfrat
It’s my hope that Obama WILL strike Iran, the problem is, the strike will:
(a.) . . . be made by Obama as purely a political gamble for the November elections, in which the Dem’s get a boost while our strike force is in the air, and Obama goes on t.v. to make the annoucement;
(b.) . . . probably not be ‘ordance rich’ to fully destroy/delay the nuclear site(s) on the first strike.
(c.) . . . induce buyers remorse in which Obama will then backtrack/apologize/blame the military for “useless civilian casualties” after the strike has ended, the UN condemns “U.S. aggression” and finds a baby-milk factory that we somehow obliterated. Along with the U.S., the usual liberal ash-and-trash at the U.N. will then condemn the “Zionists”. Obama will then blame George Bush, “who started it all.”
Originally posted by TechniXcality
the "people" of Iran are not stupid, or Bastar** rather they are uninformed biased Persians
.
Originally posted by TechniXcality
But their government is a piece of # lying manipulative, disinfo agent
Originally posted by TechniXcality and wishes it could oppress us (as western countries, that is)
Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
Okay, this is big news. We need a link to a site of some sort, even if it's a hocus-pocus dodgy one.
It’s my hope that Obama WILL strike Iran
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
Originally posted by wazorshawp
Unfortunately, it might make Obama look like a hero........
Originally posted by Flyer
Originally posted by wazorshawp
Unfortunately, it might make Obama look like a hero........
Of course, whenever someone is in danger of no being elected, drum up some kind of war and the approval rating shoots through the roof due to flag waiving morons cheering on their country like it was a sports team.