It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by akapapasmurf
i reckon its a false flag iran wouldnt dare risk a terror attack on the us while its nuclear programme is still in its infancy
Originally posted by longtermproject
No ignorance comes from making objective statements based on actual documents.... I have been privy to some Classified things at one point, so I know how that stuff is worded, and I know that the Government makes lots of mistakes.
If you haven't been paying attention lately, we have found new oil reserves inside the continental U.S. We could get that oil, much cheaper than attacking another country... the thought that we would go after another M.E. country right now is totally unfounded. We are working our way out off the countries we are in, because we know we need to knock it off for a while....
I think you have some more life to live, and experience before you make some sort of whacko judgement on me buddy....
I would never survive in Iran, because I would speak out against the atrocities that they commit on a daily basis towards their people....
Me and radical Islam don't see eye to eye.... so No deal.
I am happy with my country for the most part, I don't understand why the person who supports the country as it once was should ever have to leave it.... You want to bend the country to your will, and you want me to leave..... that sounds like Radical Islam to me....
Originally posted by jhn7537
Not sure if this has been posted yet, if it has, my apologies..
Quote from Iran Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi:
"We do not seek confrontation," he said. "If they want to confront us and impose their will on us, then that would be their end. If they are capable of hitting us with their fist, we are capable of slapping them. If we slap them it would be so hard that they can no longer hold their heads up. We emphasize that we do not want confrontation, that we want interaction. If they decide to create a confrontation and impose it on the Iranian nation, the consequences for them will be dire."
In my opinion, this could get interesting, really fast.....
Originally posted by yellowbeard
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by yellowbeard
The thing that convinces me most that this "Iranian plot" is complete bull poop is the amount ofgovernment mouthpiecesvery long standing members who hardly ever post that have come into this thread supporting it
Oh, I love being called a government mouthpiece.
It seems so much more amusing when I'm under extra survelliance for being a pain in the ass.
??????? I think your ego is getting out of control, Do you fit the criteria I put in, did you join in 2003/4 and only have a few posts to your credit ?
*looks left* Nope, it seems I wasn't talking about you then. Crawl back under your bush and hide from your alleged watchersedit on 12/10/11 by yellowbeard because: added missing r
Originally posted by Aeons
Since the USA said that there won't be these sorts of actions, but Iran and the Islamist Supporters on these boards keep up with this propaganda regardless, one wonders who it really is that wants a confrontation.
Originally posted by Aeons
I only have a few posts? Hmmm. What constitutes lots of posts?
well said.
An important first step is to make public all the details of this plot. In the Middle East in particular, it is only with clarity of facts that the United States can make a convincing case for why the Iran's anti-American posture and violent tactics is not heroic bravado deserving of accolade, but a cynical gamble that endangers the whole region.
So, were you saying that Operation Northwoods, the declassified document signed by the Joint Chief of Staff, and the Gulf of Tonkin documents were hearsay on youtube?
For a while? How about forever, we need to worry about THIS country, and knock off the entangled alliances all together.
Oh, brother. Not another one of these guys. The old guy who grew up in a time when indoctrination was much easier than it is now, since people had no access to the truth, telling everybody else they have no clue because they're not old.
Riiiight, because some of the jingoists over there, (like yourself and a few others here on this thread) would like to see you KILLED because you question the dear leaders. You wouldn't survive because of people like yourself, who see dissent as treason.
I'm sure you see eye to eye with some radical Christianity though.
I too want to see the country as it once was...that's why I support Ron Paul. If you can't see through this BULLS*#T story, I don't know how you can claim to be so wise. You don't find it odd that Holder magically comes to the rescue in October (when this was all supposedly uncovered back in May), and foils this terror plot the day he's supposed to get a subpoena for supplying no strings attached assault rifles to the very elements that Iran was supposedly trying to enlist in this plot, but just HAPPENED to reach out to an undercover agent? This elite Iranian unit is really so sloppy as to enlist a used car salesman, and weren't able to reach out to an actual cartel member? Of course, such an elite unit would probably understand that there's no way in HELL the cartels would commit an act of terrorism on American soil, for a measly 1.5 million dollars, and possibly bring U.S. troops down on them and their billion dollar industry. The whole thing stinks, and it seems the majority of people see it that way. Kinda like killing Bin Laden, dumping the body at sea before the news breaks, and refusing to provide any evidence whatsoever, other than they said so. Kinda like the assassination of the U.S. citizen, without any trial (even in absentia), that had dinner at the Pentagon after 9/11, and condemned Al Qaeda and the attacks, yet a couple years later disappears and becomes a LEADER of Al Qaeda...of course, no evidence presented, just some videos of him railing against the U.S. government. If that were all that was needed, Ted Nugent would have been droned long ago...
Originally posted by longtermproject
I honestly haven't read that much into it.... won't lie to you and say I have.... I will look at them tonight, and I will let you know what i think.... sound fair?
Far from it my friend.... I don't believe that anyone should push their beliefs on anyone.... I think that you are free to choose what you want out of life, and how you choose to live it is between you and your maker. Yes I believe in God, but no, I do not have Radical beliefs in Christianity as that goes against Christianity itself
I can see where your coming from, and I can understand why you believe the way you do, but where I have been and where I am coming from, I am just going to be honest and say that there are some things that we will never agree on.
Questions about the alleged Iranian plot
A number of Iran analysts are expressing doubt over the alleged plot to kill the Saudi Ambassador to the United States.
*snip*
"There are very few groups operationally better than Iran’s Quds Force. They know what they are doing. The only proxies they use are ones they’ve vetted. They don’t let their own citizens get involved. They send other people to do it for them from Hezbollah to Bosnian Muslims. It would be completely uncharacteristic for Iran to be caught red handed."
globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com...
Originally posted by 27jd
Wow, an interesting article from CNN (I know, I feel dirty)....
Questions about the alleged Iranian plot
A number of Iran analysts are expressing doubt over the alleged plot to kill the Saudi Ambassador to the United States.
*snip*
"There are very few groups operationally better than Iran’s Quds Force. They know what they are doing. The only proxies they use are ones they’ve vetted. They don’t let their own citizens get involved. They send other people to do it for them from Hezbollah to Bosnian Muslims. It would be completely uncharacteristic for Iran to be caught red handed."
globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com...
edit on 12-10-2011 by 27jd because: (no reason given)