The 'proof' that UFOs exist Cornwall UK

Looks like a hamster to me.

Not sure if this has been mentioned yet but, It's a seagull.

Definitely a seagull. You can even see it 'dropping bombs' on the way.

Better not be the evil bugger that stole my fish and sent my chips flying last time i was on the south coast i'd been looking forward to them all day........

reply to post by Flavian


It has been nearly 4 years since I had Fish n Chips. You have got my stomach rummbling now you little bugger.

That is a pretty cool pic!
It makes me think about all the other blurry UFO pics that are out there.
There are many pics that show a "UFO" with this body style. (Looks like Bob Lazar's Sport Model)
Lots of those pics came out of the 50's, 60's, 70's and early 80's when cameras were of a much lower quality.
How many of those pics are just birds that are caught in his same moment of flight?

reply to post by mikemck1976


What you on about cameras being of a much lower quality? They made great cameras back then, modern stuff is digital s***! Look at 'rods' for chrissake!!

Seems to be a Seagull !!.....................But it could be a Chinese lantern in disguise???

reply to post by gort51


Gort! Klaatu barada nikto!
Klaatu is back with his ship to take you home.

Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by mikemck1976

 

What you on about cameras being of a much lower quality? They made great cameras back then, modern stuff is digital s***! Look at 'rods' for chrissake!!

edit on 11-10-2011 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)

Rods are a function of a video camera's (both analog tape and digital) frame rate. A blurry still image is a function of the exposure time, not the media (film or digital). A film camera can still give us the same "blurred bird" image as a digital camera, due to exposure time.

reply to post by TheLoneArcher


My apologies. There is just something about feeling your arteries clog as you swallow isn't there?

reply to post by Flavian


When I lived in the UK I used to love walking along the Promenade, you could smell the Fish cooking and the pungent smell of vinegar. It sort of set the whole atmosphere for me.

Most definitely a sh#tehawk. If it's a ufo then theres about 50 circling my office right now!!! Where my tin foil hat :-O

Bonjour Archer,....... Don't Forget Agincourt!!!

"Gort, Declato Brosco!! "

reply to post by gort51


As a proud Englishman, I will never forget. LOL

Gort! Baco wonda restir bogo nacki wikl poo wack?
(Gort! Could you please move your foot, you are standing on my toe ?)

Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Seagull, that's pretty obvious to me.

edit on 11-10-2011 by Mister_Bit because: L

I agree!...Seagull it is.

reply to post by TheLoneArcher


It's a bit like greasy spoon cafes.........you know you shouldn't but they just make the tastiest food.............and the tea urns that haven't been cleaned for years......aahhh, bliss!!

reply to post by Flavian


When I was based at RAF Cosford, we used to have the most wonderful greasy spoon called..........The Cosford Cafe. It was fantastic, he cooked the greatest sausage baps and bacon butties and his chips were soooooooo greasy. Yum, yum.

reply to post by seabhac-rua

Most cameras that people where using that I spoke of, where mostly affordable models. Yes, they did have some really good cameras in those decades, but the average American could not afford those. Unless you were a professional photographer or with the media.
Go back and look at the records out there, and you will find most of the older UFO pics were taken with the type of cameras the average family would take on a vacation. A camera with just a film advance button and a shutter button, that’s it. With no way to adjust the shutter speed or the focus.
Which in turn, would give you the out of focus, motion blurred image that you see on this post.
Yes, this pic was taken with a digital camera, but you can see it is a seagull.
If this was taken with the type of camera that I spoke of, it would look even more like a UFO than it does now, and would have been more than likely put in the authentic UFO category. That’s all I’m saying.

I wish it wasn't, but that is 100% a seagul

you can see it's face!

(sarcasm)

Act quick!!!

We need to sell the following video of an alien creature to the Daily Mail before someone else does:



or may be this video instead:



(/sarcasm)

The Daily Mail story in the OP about a photo of a seagull is possibly a new low point for ufological stories in newspapers.

Which is really saying something...