It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Two possibilities. Double exposure or motion blur caused by a kid running across the shot.
I see nothing paranormal about it.
Originally posted by tpg65
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Two possibilities. Double exposure or motion blur caused by a kid running across the shot.
I see nothing paranormal about it.
I totally agree .
It would only take a 1 second exposure time to creat this image . See how the boy is not in focus ? This suggests a slightly longer exposure which is difficult to keep the camera still , when hand held .
In my opinion , it is just a poorly exposed shot . Nothing paranormal at all .
Originally posted by bluemooone2
reply to post by Shamatt
It is a daytime photo taken in the sunshine. Really , really doubtful that it was a long exposure of any kind.
Originally posted by bluemooone2
reply to post by Shamatt
It is a daytime photo taken in the sunshine. Really , really doubtful that it was a long exposure of any kind.
V
Originally posted by Shamatt
Originally posted by bluemooone2
reply to post by Shamatt
It is a daytime photo taken in the sunshine. Really , really doubtful that it was a long exposure of any kind.
Yes. I said in my post I reccon about 1/60th. That would fit with the technology of the time.
V
Originally posted by Shamatt
Originally posted by bluemooone2
reply to post by Shamatt
It is a daytime photo taken in the sunshine. Really , really doubtful that it was a long exposure of any kind.
Yes. I said in my post I reccon about 1/60th. That would fit with the technology of the time.