Should Canada Arrest George W. Bush on War Crimes on October 20th?

both president george bush and his son elect gwb masturbated in a coffin surrounded by other 'bonesmen' of the illuminati cult.

this cult promotes genocide and depop as we see inflicted upon millions of iraq n afghan civilians now deceased.

depleted uranium plagues those who actually survived, and generations to come in the mideast

sadly, canada is too much of a wuss to do anything better than be a docile diplomatic host

*rubs hands together gleefully*
I hope they do..it would make for a helluva birthday present

reply to post by alphacenturi


Dont get me wrong I think our leaders should be held accountible for their actions. What I dont agree with though is the double standard people apply to this topic. I get they dont like Bush and because of that they go after him. Yet those same people yammering on about Bush and his deeds are completely and totally silent when it comes to other countries, namely Iran, Syria, N. Korea, China etc etc etc.

They either want the practice stopped all together, or they dont.

There is no middle ground on this one. Either apply it fairly or expect resistance.

simple as that..

As a side note the US and Canada have a close relationshp that quivelates into family. As such, we arent going to get along on every single topic. However, there is nothing wrong with Canada applying pressure on the US to modify behavior or to stop certain actions.

What good is an International Criminal court when it breaks its own rules?

reply to post by Xcathdra


I don't care who's domestic laws it breaks, somebody needs to bring that man and his entire country ruining, economy killing, war mongering redneck behind back to justice.

Originally posted by nusnus
reply to post by Xcathdra

 

I don't care who's domestic laws it breaks,

On the off chance you are wondering, this would be where I stopped taking your post serisously. Nothing like enforcing the law by breaking the law. Once your done with your drumhead let us know so we can in turn hold one for you for breaking the same law you want Bush prosecuted for.

/rolls eyes

/end sarcasm

reply to post by Xcathdra


The international community don't give a damn about your domestic laws, because well, your laws are made for the weak and not for the rich and powerful to obey. (well they were for everyone to obey until Wall Street started funding the # out of your government and turned all of them into peons)

So if he breaks them, he isn't going to pay for them...as it is obvious...so why should I care if he breaks your laws? What I care about is that beyond your domestic laws, there is an international agreement of human rights that need to be upheld. Too bad some Americans don't see that there is something much much wider than their own domestic laws. Its called being accountable in the face of the world. HE is most definitely going to pay. Now or later.

reply to post by Slaanesh


Where was he arrested, and what country did the american die- Peace

Originally posted by ignant
both president george bush and his son elect gwb masturbated in a coffin surrounded by other 'bonesmen' of the illuminati cult.

Why bring your own sick fantasies into this thread?

GW wussed out. Poor ol dude just sits at home drinkin burbon and crying.
newsquestonline.com...

reply to post by earthdude


Yeah that poor old dude has done more and earned more than you ever will. And while he doesn't drink bourbon I'll bet he can spell it.

It's their loss anyway, it was just possible some of the loopy left skulls full of mush might have learned something but considering where they are I doubt it.

Originally posted by nusnus
reply to post by Xcathdra

 

The international community don't give a damn about your domestic laws, because well, your laws are made for the weak and not for the rich and powerful to obey. (well they were for everyone to obey until Wall Street started funding the # out of your government and turned all of them into peons)

So if he breaks them, he isn't going to pay for them...as it is obvious...so why should I care if he breaks your laws? What I care about is that beyond your domestic laws, there is an international agreement of human rights that need to be upheld. Too bad some Americans don't see that there is something much much wider than their own domestic laws. Its called being accountable in the face of the world. HE is most definitely going to pay. Now or later.

edit on 15-10-2011 by nusnus because: (no reason given)

It has nothing to do with violating international agreements, as I have already stated. For people who are pissed about the US actions, please justify your 2 wrongs make a right mentality. Its fine if you could care less about US domestic law. It makes it easier for the US to just invade your country and be done with it, since apparently laws are of no value to you unless it goes your way, right?

Hypocrisy for the win

reply to post by wasco2


Nice personal attack there Mr. Defender of the proven exploiter. Name calling never proves your point at all. Imagine the heckling he would have gotten if he did speak.

reply to post by earthdude


That is the wrong Mr. Bush visit.

He came, he saw, he left. Protestors came, they saw, they left.

Both sides acted peacfeully and there were no arrests of anyone made.

George W. Bush draws protest...

Edit to add:

I don't know if this is note worthy, but it is interesting (from the link):

Meanwhile, members of the Canadian Centre for International Justice said they intended to file a criminal complaint of torture against Bush in Surrey provincial court. CCIJ legal director Matt Eisenbrandt said Canada has a legal responsibility to prosecute people involved in torture.

Keep in mind that CCIJ is not an official department of the Goverment of Canada. They do, however, follow and prosecute as best they can under Canadian and International Laws.

Fact is that bush is not even allowed in canada since he has a DUI conviction. They waived that law when he was president, but i don't know what the excuse is now.

reply to post by peck420


If they are going to use Canadian Law / body to prosecute then I must ask how do they establish jurisidiction? As always, where is there arrest warrants for the Canadian PM, British PM, Syrian President / Sudan / China / Russia etc etc etc etc.

Its one thing to be pissed about the way a human is treated and attempt to do something positive to stop it. However, when the prosecution is selective, not only do they lose their moral authority, they lose credability as well.

Where are they on the Iranian man sentenced to death for refusing to renounce his Christian faith?
Where are they on the guy who was sent to jail for 3 years for making disparaging remarks about Islam?

As I said - in for a penny in for a pound.

Absent that they need to sit down and shut up.

reply to post by peck420


Thanks for the correction. I guess the internet has some misdirection on it. Toronto vs. Vancouver. I guess apathy can be a good thing.

Bush made it in and out of Canada with no incident / attempts of arrest.

I think the people who want to attempt the arrest should know that he, lik eother world leaders, is immune from prosecution (doctrine of soveriegn immunity here in the states thanks to our cousins over the pond). He also still has a secret service detail, and will have that detail for 10 years from the date he left office.

Anyone know how the arrest warrants are going for The Taliban / Alqueida, Syria, Iran, N. Korea, Sudan and Canada?

It makes me sick to my stomach, to see him throw out the 1st pitch, during the World Series, is all i know. I WILL NEVER look at that man, with honor or respect. He will ALWAYS BE a WAR CRIMINAL, in my eyes!!!!!

Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by peck420

 

If they are going to use Canadian Law / body to prosecute then I must ask how do they establish jurisidiction? As always, where is there arrest warrants for the Canadian PM, British PM, Syrian President / Sudan / China / Russia etc etc etc etc.

Its one thing to be pissed about the way a human is treated and attempt to do something positive to stop it. However, when the prosecution is selective, not only do they lose their moral authority, they lose credability as well.

Where are they on the Iranian man sentenced to death for refusing to renounce his Christian faith?
Where are they on the guy who was sent to jail for 3 years for making disparaging remarks about Islam?

As I said - in for a penny in for a pound.

Absent that they need to sit down and shut up.

You might want to read up on the group.

They are trying to get Canada (their own country) brought up to the UN for crimes against humanity for treatment of Aboriginal Children.

As far as I can tell the only determining factor in their selection is time and funding, of which they lack both.

Okay, informal view here. Discovered this topic five minutes ago. Canadian here, but had no idea about the issue. things slip through, so sue me. (no, don't).

Peck420 is the only person to report on this thread, and didn't even get a star from any of you for the effort.
Not even the thread author cared enough to follow up.

Is there any wonder why information doesn't get delivered, or follow-up's get reported, or people care about recaps? If this was the MSN, they'd be all over professional reports like that. As citizens, if we are ever to compete with the MSN and deliver our own news we have to be more on top of things, and adopt some more responsibility for keeping people informed and up to date, even if it takes a little bit out of our schedule. I mean, c'mon ...