It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As it turns out, Siri — the voice-activated data assistant available on Apple’s iPhone upgrade — is a veteran. Nearly 10 years ago, Darpa funded a project known as PAL, for Personalized Assistant that Learns.
It was an adaptive AI program for both data retrieval and data synthesis. (So not entirely like search, but not dissimilar, either.)
If you told PAL what information you needed, and it observed what you did with that information, it would figure out a more efficient path to acquiring and sorting relevant information the next time around.
The project started out with a California company called SRI International. With a five-year, multimillion dollar grant from Darpa under the PAL program, SRI developed a system called CALO, for Cognitive Agent that Learns and Organizes.
By 2008 — with the PAL project not bearing fruit — SRI didn’t want to miss out on the commercial opportunities of iPhone apps. So it spun off a company called Siri Incorporated to develop what became the first iteration of the Siri app — a so-called “do engine” that weaved user preferences with existing web functions to, say, let you know what time the nearest Iron Man showing started. (It wasn’t voice-activated.) Apple thought the Siri’s tech showed promise, so it paid a rumored $150 to $200 million for the company.
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
Android has had functional voice recognition since the G1. It has gotten better and better with each new iteration.
Not sure why people continue to buy iPhone's when Android is such more robust and customizable product.
If you have the brains and a few days to learn, you can install a custom OS on your Android phone that is pure AOSP, and avoid any potential evesdropping software. iPhone, on the other hand, all look and act the same and the potential for corporate/government evesdropping is strong.edit on 10-10-2011 by TinkerHaus because: i r spell gud
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
I am wondering how long it will be before this kind of tech is developed to such a degree that it actually reprimands us for being "naughty."
Picture the scene,you are rushing a family member to hospital,and you break the speed limit.
Siri starts up with"You are braking the speed limit,Slow down!"
Followed by "Final Warning!"
Followed by "The police have been informed,and are en route to your destination."
Or how about when they link up other sensors to Siri-
"You have eaten too many calories today,Stop eating!"
You walk past someone who is smoking-
"Warning Environmental Hazard detected!"
This could get to be very intrusive I think.
Of course there may well be positives as well,but I seem to see the negatives in technology-not because I am a negative person,rather from past experiences over the years.
Originally posted by wlasikiewicz
will this be on the ios 5 update for iphone 4?
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
Android has had functional voice recognition since the G1. It has gotten better and better with each new iteration.
Not sure why people continue to buy iPhone's when Android is such more robust and customizable product.
If you have the brains and a few days to learn, you can install a custom OS on your Android phone that is pure AOSP, and avoid any potential evesdropping software. iPhone, on the other hand, all look and act the same and the potential for corporate/government evesdropping is strong.edit on 10-10-2011 by TinkerHaus because: i r spell gud
Originally posted by eagleeye2
I totally agree, people rely too much on those gadget, they forget how to think.
Because people say to themselves, "why shoulda remember this information since its 3 clicks away."
They can't express an opinion by themselves, they need to look GaGas tweet before.
Use your head not a smartphone, you will be surprised on how much edge you will gain over ignorant customers.