It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to post by waypastvne
You have been debunked and proven ignorant in every 911 thread you post on, I dont know why you bother here as well.
Read the first post young man and try to refute the evidence point by point rather than regurgitate nonsensical rants.edit on 11-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Here is one
For two years prior to 9/11, Ptech was working to identify potential problems or weaknesses in the FAA's response plans to events like a terrorist hijacking of a plane over U.S. airspace. According to their own business plan for their contract with the FAA, Ptech was given access to every process and system in the FAA dealing with their crisis response protocols. This included examining key systems and infrastructure to analyze the FAA's "network management, network security, configuration management, fault management, performance management, application administration, network management and user desk help operations." In short, Ptech had free reign to examine every FAA system and process for dealing with the exact type of event that was to occur on 9/11. Even more incredible, researcher Indira Singh points out that Ptech was specifically analyzing the potential interoperability problems between the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon in the event of an emergency over U.S. airspace.
edit on 11-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
I have provided information. You have failed in every attempt to refute this information.
You have no right to make queries if you cannot refute the information presented in a intelligent, mature manner.
Until then. You fail.edit on 11-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Shadow HerderEven more incredible, researcher Indira Singh points out that Ptech was specifically analyzing the potential interoperability problems between the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon in the event of an emergency over U.S. airspace
Originally posted by Cecilofs
Originally posted by Shadow HerderEven more incredible, researcher Indira Singh points out that Ptech was specifically analyzing the potential interoperability problems between the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon in the event of an emergency over U.S. airspace
Perhaps you missed this part??
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to post by waypastvne
In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to post by waypastvne
In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.
This evidence surely seems to suggest that.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to post by waypastvne
In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.
This evidence surely seems to suggest that.
Where exactly does it suggest that ? Be specific.