It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To me, this just sounds totally absurd, by far the most unbelievable nonsense I've read. I don't even know what to say.
. As I said today's vessels are not built, they self assemble with nano-technology from raw materials, entire planets can, and have been, converted into massive ships. They have planet sized ships that somehow have no mass, thus no gravity of their own, and the influence of gravity upon them is barely perceptible.
How? Who's been to the future? What did they see and how did they make it back?
Time Travel is possible, but you can not go back in time in your own time. When you go back an alternative timeline is constructed.
How and why? What's the point in creating these sex servants?
Most hybrids are created to be servants and are a mix of human and animal DNA, or sex slaves I suppose is the best term. People like me many times have one of a favorite actor/actress or someone we believe is extremely hot. There are some very .. exotic ones though. Some I have heard about I find outright repulsive.
Originally posted by DrJay1975
I'm also sure it's a complete waste of time for me to even question your authenticity. I wouldn't be surprised to see an Ebook or a website pop up in your near future.
Originally posted by Grifter81
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by Grifter81
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by StrangerThanFiction39
I stopped right here:
1. Actually I think it was cloning that was used, creating civilizations replete with entire memories.
It's entirely possible that you, in concocting this fantasy, did so without a solid understanding of what cloning actually is...and more importantly, is not.
Others who may be reading this (if any are still left) who are rational and intelligent will understand immediately the flaws there.
Hope your science-fiction book sells to a publisher, but you still have some manuscript polishing to do.......
edit on Fri 21 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
You mean what cloning using Earth based technologies Is and Is Not. Stop being blinded by the limited technology of HERE.
But how can you expect us to write off our only frame of reference? Do you expect us to go on your word alone that these technologies exsist? Without proof it's not going to happen I'm afraid.
You tell a good story but as far as anyone is concerned that's really all it is, a story. All you have written has been written before at some stage by authors, script writers or whatever. IMO your asking a lot if you expect everyone to blindly believe everything you say at face value?
You can't tell people not to be blinded by the technology here when it's all we've got to work from?edit on 22/10/2011 by Grifter81 because: (no reason given)
It's clear to anyone with any knowledge that the technology we have available will improve, and what I suggest WILL some day be possible. That other poster was writing it off as if it was an impossibility no matter what. I do not need anyone to believe a word I say, I was simply exposing his post as fallacious. If he (or you) does not want to believe what I say is true, that is fine, do not say it's not true because what I suggest breaks a fundamental law.
Stop being blind means look at what I say, and decide if it is possible with more advanced technology. I do not think what I have written has been written nby any author before me. Show me an author writing about advanced starships made out of cell-like nano-technologies that can alter their design at will to fit what is needed at any moment.
As i have said earlier, Iain banks. The robot Gort from the newer version of the Day The Earth Stood Still was made out of self replicating nano machines that could reorganise themselves at will. In fact the end of that film is a good analogy of how you describe the 'strip mining' of 'thousands' of planets by the 'EC'.
The replicators from stargate SG1 spring to mind, and who could forget the Borg from Star Trek? They are cybernetic but have 'nanobots' within them that when 'injected' into technology can turn it into whatever the hive mind sees fit.
The concepts you speak of are all there, it doesn't take a great deal of imagination to perhaps scale them up and apply them to a spaceship, or even an all encompassing race of super intelligent machines such as your 'EC' and its 'CC's'
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
There's certainly a hell of a lot of flaws. Amusing read though.
Originally posted by ProudBird
Others who may be reading this (if any are still left) who are rational and intelligent will understand immediately the flaws there.
edit on Fri 21 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
So many that neither of you point to a single one. Easy to rebut something when you do not actually rebut anything.
Yes, so many, indeed. You know deep down that what you've written here isn't truthful and so do the rest of us (the sane ones, anyway). As I said though, amusing read.
Originally posted by Realm52
So it's all about the nanotechnology isn't it?
To me, this just sounds totally absurd, by far the most unbelievable nonsense I've read. I don't even know what to say.
. As I said today's vessels are not built, they self assemble with nano-technology from raw materials, entire planets can, and have been, converted into massive ships. They have planet sized ships that somehow have no mass, thus no gravity of their own, and the influence of gravity upon them is barely perceptible.
How? Who's been to the future? What did they see and how did they make it back?
Time Travel is possible, but you can not go back in time in your own time. When you go back an alternative timeline is constructed.
How and why? What's the point in creating these sex servants?
Most hybrids are created to be servants and are a mix of human and animal DNA, or sex slaves I suppose is the best term. People like me many times have one of a favorite actor/actress or someone we believe is extremely hot. There are some very .. exotic ones though. Some I have heard about I find outright repulsive.
Too many questions to ask on such an unbelievably absurd thread.
edit: and are you saying the 'greys' were another hybrid created by man?
edit on 30-10-2011 by Realm52 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DABird
ok, despite your story being true or not what I dont understand is the ruse of your pretend job. I mean simply why bother, it doesnt make sense. There are many flights into groom lake everyday and I would assume none of them bother having a second job (at night mind you like yours) to cover thier real job. Its simple, someone asks, you dont answer and thats how it works.
Secondly if you are involved in behavioural science, then you were or are obviously qualified in that area. Why isnt your pretend job in that area? Why the night watchman, clerk or whatever you do (real) job in the middle of the night, you have already admitted its a lame arse job. Wouldnt it be more suspicious if you were not working in your area of expertise?
If you are a loner (where I think you mentioned you were) and no one would miss you, then why come back at all to earth? Sounds a hell of a lot nicer and cooler up there than here.
ponder that
What makes it nonsense?
Originally posted by DABird
reply to post by StrangerThanFiction39
Questions are all we have, without questions you have no story to tell.
Surely they would have some riches for your reward, why do it then?
So how do you get to the Ship, where are you teleported (however you get there) from? Do you go to area 51 or somewhere else? Does groom lake still have anything to do with this at all?
Im not buying the no greys thing, there are too many abduction stories as well as better fanciful explantions than the twist you are throwing at us. How can you in anyway provide just one shreed of evidence any of this is true?
Originally posted by Realm52
reply to post by StrangerThanFiction39
What makes it nonsense?
"entire planets can, and have been, converted into massive ships" - that makes itself nonsense.
Why and how is this meant to happen? sorry if I missed any explanations, but to me that sounds like something only the creator of a sci-fi PC gamer would come up with. What's the purpose?
It's all absurdity!
Originally posted by tpg65
Call me an old Skeptic , but does anybody else get the feeling that the OP & StrangerThanFiction39 are one and the same person ?????
Originally posted by Nobama
StrangerThanFiction39 if what you say is indeed true than surely you have broke a vow of silence or something? oh and you aren't the first one to come here and claim to be someone who works at area 51, others have said far different things take place there, than what you're telling us..
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by Realm52
reply to post by StrangerThanFiction39
What makes it nonsense?
"entire planets can, and have been, converted into massive ships" - that makes itself nonsense.
Why and how is this meant to happen? sorry if I missed any explanations, but to me that sounds like something only the creator of a sci-fi PC gamer would come up with. What's the purpose?
It's all absurdity!
As I understand it the main goal is preparedness in case an advanced alien race is discovered and is hostile. I have already talked about nano-bots strip mining planets, you can read that and I will fill in the blanks if you wish.
Originally posted by Realm52
Thanks for the time and words Stranger.
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by Realm52
reply to post by StrangerThanFiction39
What makes it nonsense?
"entire planets can, and have been, converted into massive ships" - that makes itself nonsense.
Why and how is this meant to happen? sorry if I missed any explanations, but to me that sounds like something only the creator of a sci-fi PC gamer would come up with. What's the purpose?
It's all absurdity!
As I understand it the main goal is preparedness in case an advanced alien race is discovered and is hostile. I have already talked about nano-bots strip mining planets, you can read that and I will fill in the blanks if you wish.
I just can't make any sense out of that. Doesn't that make us look rather hostile?
Stripping and destroying entire planets, then turning 'em into massive war machines?
IF we ever managed to come across an advanced race of aliens and # went down, is the human population allowed access onto these thousands of planet-sized ships? Is that their purpose?
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
There's certainly a hell of a lot of flaws. Amusing read though.
Originally posted by ProudBird
Others who may be reading this (if any are still left) who are rational and intelligent will understand immediately the flaws there.
edit on Fri 21 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
So many that neither of you point to a single one. Easy to rebut something when you do not actually rebut anything.
Yes, so many, indeed. You know deep down that what you've written here isn't truthful and so do the rest of us (the sane ones, anyway). As I said though, amusing read.
Again, so many you can not name a single one. I do not care if you believe it to be truthful or not, as I have stated that is not my purpose. I just dislike foolishness. Any time a person claims there are so many problems they can not name one what they are really saying is I can't find one so I will claim there are many.
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
Originally posted by StrangerThanFiction39
Originally posted by HardToStarboard
There's certainly a hell of a lot of flaws. Amusing read though.
Originally posted by ProudBird
Others who may be reading this (if any are still left) who are rational and intelligent will understand immediately the flaws there.
edit on Fri 21 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
So many that neither of you point to a single one. Easy to rebut something when you do not actually rebut anything.
Yes, so many, indeed. You know deep down that what you've written here isn't truthful and so do the rest of us (the sane ones, anyway). As I said though, amusing read.
Again, so many you can not name a single one. I do not care if you believe it to be truthful or not, as I have stated that is not my purpose. I just dislike foolishness. Any time a person claims there are so many problems they can not name one what they are really saying is I can't find one so I will claim there are many.
On 10/11 you said you work in "psychiatry." This implies something. I have degrees in psychology and neuroscience and I'm currently working on a degree in medicine. I know how people in the field talk. Anyone who states they "work in psychiatry" is implying something. Tell me about where you matched.