It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Holy $^i+
I wonder if that did break on through to the other side (The Doors)
That is friggin enormous!!
They will ignore it and pretend it does not exist.
Originally posted by centrifugal
NASA did pull the SOHO feed shortly after finding out about the comet.
Not sure why they pulled the feed, but if this was an attempt to cover up information they failed pretty bad.
It makes me wonder how NASA is supposedly hiding a dwarf star if they can't even hide a comet.
edit on 4-10-2011 by centrifugal because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VicDiaz89
its a comet,i dont see what the big deal is,this happens often...btw SLAP YOURSELF for using the word sheeple.
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
reply to post by SheeplFlavoredAgain
I think we will NEVER determine what that was, 'cause the ONLY data available comes from NASA and US military. I mean, who else has access to data from sun-observing space crafts??? So doesn't matter if that was an alien plasma weapon, a DARPA missile or a rogue planet. The official explanation is "That was a comet". Everything different than that, will be promptly refuted and ridiculed by the online shills.
Originally posted by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
reply to post by SheeplFlavoredAgain
I think we will NEVER determine what that was, 'cause the ONLY data available comes from NASA and US military. I mean, who else has access to data from sun-observing space crafts??? So doesn't matter if that was an alien plasma weapon, a DARPA missile or a rogue planet. The official explanation is "That was a comet". Everything different than that, will be promptly refuted and ridiculed by the online shills.
To use the vernacular, can you prove it wasn't a comet? 'Scepticism' means being able to question, it doesn't mean rigid unquestioning faith in an alternative explanation. And lose one point for the word 'sheeple' in your username.
What I want to know is why it's so hard for people to believe a large flare like this was caused by a massive object hitting the Sun? It seems fairly obvious to me such a strong impact could provoke a flare, regardless of which physics theory we are using to explain it.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by mnemeth1
They will ignore it and pretend it does not exist.
Will you ignore all the other times that a comet has hit the sun and there was no flare?
Will you pretend such a thing does not exist?