It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
An Arizona man has filed a federal lawsuit against some of the state's top judges, claiming they're taking away his freedom of speech and right to own firearms, all because someone didn't like what he wrote on his blog.
"You can't suspend someone's constitutional rights [for blogging]," said Mike Palmer, who is bringing forth the legal action. "Everybody in America blogs or Twitters, so it's a First and Second Amendment issue."
The scenario started when Palmer, a 55-year-old Christian missio
After WND's coverage of Roth's case, Judge Slaughter eventually reversed her decision on the weapons ban, but Roth says she refused to dismiss his attorney fees.
Originally posted by Unity_99
It says in the link:
After WND's coverage of Roth's case, Judge Slaughter eventually reversed her decision on the weapons ban, but Roth says she refused to dismiss his attorney fees.
It appears this was reversed but he still is left with a hefty bill.
Originally posted by seabag
I guess we all need to start being more selective in our word choice here on ATS (and other sites). The woman clearly took the man's words out of context. This is a clear violation of his second amendment rights. He committed no crime and he legally owned the firearm. This is a dangerous precedent. Whose guns will they go after next?
www.wnd.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Unity_99
It says in the link:
It appears this was reversed but he still is left with a hefty bill.
Originally posted by seabag
I guess we all need to start being more selective in our word choice here on ATS (and other sites). The woman clearly took the man's words out of context. This is a clear violation of his second amendment rights. He committed no crime and he legally owned the firearm. This is a dangerous precedent. Whose guns will they go after next?
www.wnd.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
It is being handled swiftly. Are you not happy with the security being purchased for the low, low price of your freedoms? There is a strict no refund/no return policy.
Originally posted by Praetorius
Take care, and here's to seeing this dealt with swiftly.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
It is being handled swiftly. Are you not happy with the security being purchased for the low, low price of your freedoms? There is a strict no refund/no return policy.
Originally posted by Praetorius
Take care, and here's to seeing this dealt with swiftly.
Originally posted by Praetorius
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
It is being handled swiftly. Are you not happy with the security being purchased for the low, low price of your freedoms? There is a strict no refund/no return policy.
Originally posted by Praetorius
Take care, and here's to seeing this dealt with swiftly.
Oh, wait - you're saying if I just keep my mouth shut and give up all my personal liberty and ability to defend myself, the government will always see to my safety and I won't ever have to worry about being hungry, hurt, or stolen from again? And just in case something goes wrong, I still us sticks and melee weapons for self-defense, right?
Well in that case, sign me up! What's a little liberty in light of that? Thanks for setting me straight on this.
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by DerbyCityLights
Thus far, the only gun grabbing was done by Dubya in New Orleans. Shrub had a small ass so I will give him a pass, but Cheney did a lot of ass wiping with the constitution.
A few more things.
No awarding winning journalist would work for WND.
If you read it in WND, it is probably crap.
So many unconstitutional rulings are being issued lately I weep for the future of our nation. Considering the things I've written (and stand by) I'm expecting a Hellfire missile to slam into my house at any m
Sorry, there are so many liberals here on ATS that seem perfectly happy with trading their freedoms for the government nanny state lifestyle.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by DarthMuerte
Apologies if I didn't lay that on quite thickly enough.
Definite sarcasm. I've yet to see government on pretty much any level succeed at providing the necessary real-time protection needed against any of these issues. Be well.