New video showing the second Tower impact

reply to post by ckitch


I wasn't really claiming that the plane and sounds were fake, I guess I'm claiming more that the filmers knew it was coming.

Originally posted by iunlimited491
I'm not debating these conspiracies anymore... (IT"S A F***ING COMMERCIAL AIRLINER, CRASHING INTO ONE OF THE F***ING TALLEST SKYSCRAPER'S IN NORTH AMERICA AT THE TIME.)

I would say the general perception of reality goes out the window at that time.

No offence... but wow...

I agree. They were planes of some sort that flew into those two buildings. But for you to pontificate 'they were commercial airliners' is just as bad as the 'they were hologram' crowd!

You only THINK they were commercial planes based on what was told. No one to my knowledge captured on film or on tape the insignias of ANY of these planes (although I believe there were only two planes involved)

reply to post by mayabong


Do you know what your witnessing? No, do you really f***ing know? I'm sure there was mixed reactions. First of all, the person with the camera is OBVIOUSLY surrounded by more people than the OP's video... and second of all, who's to say, they didn't add "screams" to that video for the commonly used effect of dramatization? Listen I don't care what you believe, and I'm not dissing you... but contrary to what YOU would expect... NOBODY expected that.

Originally posted by thepresenttense
Does anyone have any idea what the intense buzzing sound is that starts just after the plane hits the tower in this video? I've never noticed that in any other video I've seen of the second plane strike.

The buzzing noise heard in the Naudet's brother footage were the 'lost' firemen alarm detectors going off. They are automatically set off when there is no movement from the person wearing it so others can locate them.

The noise in this film is odd because it all seems to stop at once. So, very hard to say. I thought maybe car alarms but why would they all sound off at once and then, stop?

reply to post by iunlimited491


Except the Isareli's arrested that day......

Originally posted by ckitch
reply to post by mayabong

 

I agree... and no voices after the 2nd 'impact', which is ridiculous, given then were chatting non stop prior to that. However, more importantly, why the hell would you be videoing the top of an obscured tower, just at the very second its hit???? Tourists my a*rse!

I agree, it's anothr fake vid, with added plane sounds etc....

Is this video fake too? They did a hell of a job with the second hit & reactions.

Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by ckitch

 

I wasn't really claiming that the plane and sounds were fake, I guess I'm claiming more that the filmers knew it was coming.

Here is why all similar video is highly suspect.



He says holograms. I say C.G.I.!

Originally posted by Varemia
I've never seen this footage before, and it's kind of suspicious the way it caught everything. If you skip to 1:40, you'll see the second CGI plane hit from an angle that's impossible. You really have to see it. They did a poor job of adding fake audio of a plane just before it comes on screen.

Just thought this was worth showing people, because it is something that could not happen in real life and proves video manipulation . The filmers appear to be CIA/MOSSAD/ISS/MI6 or something. I'm not certain.

FIXED

reply to post by ckitch




I am curious, when people such as yourself, say it's another faked video (which it could very well be) what's your assumption then? Are you suggesting there were NO planes? Is it your belief they used holograms? Or missiles?

I just wonder what's left when people are ruling out airplanes.

Because I believe they WERE planes (maybe modified with some missile warhead or something) but not the commercial planes that were purportedly hijacked. I find that hard to believe especially when you have the architect of that whole complex on record saying those two buildings were built to withstand a 727 plane impact (these planes weren't that much bigger) So...c'mon. How many 'fails' can there be in one day that just so happened, to change the world we live in?

reply to post by iunlimited491



Apparently you DO care what people think otherwise you wouldn't be sharing your opinions, correcting others and cussing.

There's no need to get so belligerent cause here's the thing: it is very unlikely we will ever find out what truly happened that day within our lifetime. Because look at JFK. That's almost 50 years old and hardly ANY one believes Oswald acted alone and the truth is STILL not told.

So, this event was designed, in part, to tear people apart and divide the masses. And it worked.

Believe in what you want but we've come too far to start correcting others in their beliefs.

I still want to know what was in the pod underneath the plane.

That has never been answered to my satisfaction, and it appears in ALL of the videos of the second hit.

reply to post by pshea38


Interesting. Thanks for posting.

reply to post by OldCorp


Ask your Israeli buddies.

That's the well known video filmed by Czech immigrant Pavel Hlava, one of only a few who filmed the first and second attacks. If memory serves, he didn't even know he filmed the first attack till days after the attacks.

This person had little to no reaction too!



www.youtube.com...


If these are faked, are they fakes like the fake UFO videos people try to pass off on YouTube? Or are they faked because they (PTB) want you to believe these videos are real BECAUSE, something else actually happened?

I am not sure where the onus belongs when you're claiming these videos are fakes (although I agree, this one is VERY questionable). Why can't it just be some a**hole prankster trying to pull a fast one? Why amp this up and make this a government conspiracy against the people?

Although I KNOW 9-11 was an inside job. I just don't see how these 'planes' could've been faked. But like I've been saying, I believe they were NOT the planes we were told they were.

Not sure if I am wording my question properly. It's almost 2AM so.....sorry!

Triple post? How the hell did THAT happen?

Double post

Originally posted by PersonalChoice
That's the well known video filmed by Czech immigrant Pavel Hlava, one of only a few who filmed the first and second attacks. If memory serves, he didn't even know he filmed the first attack till days after the attacks.

Why was he even aiming at and zooming in at a portion of a building that was so far away? It's not like he was filming the Statue of Liberty. He was taping the upper portion of an impeded building.

Seems kinda odd, no?

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Interesting theory. I haven't seen too many other amateur videos.
Do you know if there's an existing thread discussing just what you said?
Thanks

Sorry, I'm terrible at keeping my sources straight.

This "bogus videos" idea was courtesy the "September Clues" group.

There was subsequently a huge effort to debunk their theory, and now their videos have been moved to [HOAX].

And so it goes. I haven't read the debunkers' data yet. This gets to be just too much.

skip to 1:46 exactly, and look at it fullscreen, look at the plane's left edge, of the tail and wing, you guys see that line? like the plane is cut out and pasted into the image? see the line of its image which lines up perfect from wing to tail?

thats odd isnt it? wonder what that could be,,,,,